The conversion for "regular" <tabs> elements is straightforward, most of
the work here is to support the tab strip (the <tabs> element with the id
"tabbrowser-tabs"). The markup needed for the tab strip moves directly
into browser.xhtml and the construction/teardown logic is now explicitly
driven from gBrowser. There are many more little tweaks too numerous to
enumerate.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32855
--HG--
rename : browser/base/content/tabbrowser.xml => browser/base/content/tabbrowser-tabs.js
extra : source : c163881a80c9a032b40f7d965fad6a6850fcf8a4
extra : intermediate-source : a5c6deeda8a9475ac0268a4351417c8ff659c962
extra : histedit_source : 5eb8b3d14027f2aeca5c52534096837cd0343104%2Ca23a07ddd5e1fb8bd084644dd6db0ee028b7c4b4
A bunch of existing code assumes that <tab> elements are the immediate
and only children of a <tabs> element, and uses dom apis to traverse
relationships between these elements. To simplify conversion of <tabs>
to a custom element (and hopefully improve readability a bit at the same
time!), introduce new apis:
On <tab>
this.parentNode -> this.container
this.nextElementSibling -> this.container.findNextTab(...)
this.previousElementSibiling -> this.container.findNextTab(...)
On <tabs>
this.children -> this.allTabs
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34648
--HG--
extra : source : f4e21e465f384b90fa1e768141c4db708748bf66
extra : histedit_source : 95d8a4242e8e04df9e29c2b647558d37e910b845
The conversion for "regular" <tabs> elements is straightforward, most of
the work here is to support the tab strip (the <tabs> element with the id
"tabbrowser-tabs"). The markup needed for the tab strip moves directly
into browser.xhtml and the construction/teardown logic is now explicitly
driven from gBrowser. There are many more little tweaks too numerous to
enumerate.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32855
--HG--
rename : browser/base/content/tabbrowser.xml => browser/base/content/tabbrowser-tabs.js
extra : rebase_source : 6b2b0ed9b01958d1b2db605ab300c4bebcaa461c
extra : source : c163881a80c9a032b40f7d965fad6a6850fcf8a4
A bunch of existing code assumes that <tab> elements are the immediate
and only children of a <tabs> element, and uses dom apis to traverse
relationships between these elements. To simplify conversion of <tabs>
to a custom element (and hopefully improve readability a bit at the same
time!), introduce new apis:
On <tab>
this.parentNode -> this.container
this.nextElementSibling -> this.container.findNextTab(...)
this.previousElementSibiling -> this.container.findNextTab(...)
On <tabs>
this.children -> this.allTabs
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34648
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : affeda0295a5195124709f322de524aea3a28a3f
Right now there's some duplicated code with the focus manager and the
DOMWindowFocus event.
Android didn't handle the new framefocusrequested event, so the test-cases in
bug 416771 still didn't work there.
I think using the focus manager codepath everywhere is preferable. I confirmed
manually that the stuff that sent DOMWindowFocus events still works as expected
with this patch (i.e., switching to the right tab when you click on a
notification, etc.).
This fixes it so that it works in Fennec, and it sends the focus events right in
GeckoView Example (i.e., we get here[1] properly).
The snippet that Snorp provided on IRC to implement the "bring activity to
front" stuff (`startActivity(getIntent())`) didn't actually work for me, but I
confirmed that the right message is sent when the focus is requested, and that
we get there.
[1]: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/952521e6164ddffa3f34bc8cfa5a81afc5b859c4/mobile/android/geckoview_example/src/main/java/org/mozilla/geckoview_example/GeckoViewActivity.java#503
Depends on D32353
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32354
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
If we're doing a process switch due to the cross origin opener policy
being mismatched, we don't want to preserve the browsing context.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26392
If we're doing a process switch due to the cross origin opener policy
being mismatched, we don't want to preserve the browsing context.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26392
This patch introduces a new type of content process, which has a dynamic name.
This type of content process is labeled as `webIsolated=${SITE_ORIGIN}` and is
used within fission-enabled windows.
To enable this, additional information about the fission status of the target
window must be passed into E10SUtils. This was done by updating every call site
manually to pass an extra boolean. A better solution perhaps should be used in
the future.
With this patch enabled, we now perform process switches, but only when
navigating to HTTP URIs. If we navigate to a non-HTTP URI in an iframe with
fission enabled, it will not behave correctly. This must be done in a
follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29570
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
nsITabParent is exposed to frontend code and is generally used as a representation of a remote tab. We could just rename the interface to nsIBrowserParent and worry about it later, but I think it's better to rename the interface to nsIRemoteTab so that we can later work on splitting the interface away from the PBrowser protocol.
Note: Some frontend code refers to a TabParentId. This commit renames this to RemoteTabId. We need to figure out the purpose of TabId with fission.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28132
--HG--
rename : dom/interfaces/base/nsITabParent.idl => dom/interfaces/base/nsIRemoteTab.idl
extra : rebase_source : 9d8a1790a7bb10195ad063644d1a93d63b2afb72
This should make it easier to tell whether a particular window is
fission-enabled as testing with fission enabled improves.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26561
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
