ContentTask tasks have a different lifetime than SpecialPowers tasks, with the
former being tied to the lifetime of a message manager and the latter tied to
the lifetime of a window global. That means that existing ContentTask callers
which expect to be able to register load listeners before the creation of a
window global, or which expect to persist after a page has navigated, won't
work as SpecialPowers tasks.
Since those sorts of tasks are not really resilient in the face of Fission,
they should really be written to work differently, but this patch mostly just
reverts them to using ContentTask for the time being.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53744
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is generally pretty straightforward, and rewrites nearly all calls. It
skips the ones that it can detect using frame script globals like
`sendAsyncMessage`, though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53740
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
ContentTask tasks have a different lifetime than SpecialPowers tasks, with the
former being tied to the lifetime of a message manager and the latter tied to
the lifetime of a window global. That means that existing ContentTask callers
which expect to be able to register load listeners before the creation of a
window global, or which expect to persist after a page has navigated, won't
work as SpecialPowers tasks.
Since those sorts of tasks are not really resilient in the face of Fission,
they should really be written to work differently, but this patch mostly just
reverts them to using ContentTask for the time being.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53744
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is generally pretty straightforward, and rewrites nearly all calls. It
skips the ones that it can detect using frame script globals like
`sendAsyncMessage`, though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53740
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
ContentTask tasks have a different lifetime than SpecialPowers tasks, with the
former being tied to the lifetime of a message manager and the latter tied to
the lifetime of a window global. That means that existing ContentTask callers
which expect to be able to register load listeners before the creation of a
window global, or which expect to persist after a page has navigated, won't
work as SpecialPowers tasks.
Since those sorts of tasks are not really resilient in the face of Fission,
they should really be written to work differently, but this patch mostly just
reverts them to using ContentTask for the time being.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53744
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is generally pretty straightforward, and rewrites nearly all calls. It
skips the ones that it can detect using frame script globals like
`sendAsyncMessage`, though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53740
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
ContentTask tasks have a different lifetime than SpecialPowers tasks, with the
former being tied to the lifetime of a message manager and the latter tied to
the lifetime of a window global. That means that existing ContentTask callers
which expect to be able to register load listeners before the creation of a
window global, or which expect to persist after a page has navigated, won't
work as SpecialPowers tasks.
Since those sorts of tasks are not really resilient in the face of Fission,
they should really be written to work differently, but this patch mostly just
reverts them to using ContentTask for the time being.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53744
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is generally pretty straightforward, and rewrites nearly all calls. It
skips the ones that it can detect using frame script globals like
`sendAsyncMessage`, though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53740
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Let SessionStoreUtils be a WebIDL namespace, rather than a XPCOM service
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9776
--HG--
rename : toolkit/components/sessionstore/nsSessionStoreUtils.cpp => toolkit/components/sessionstore/SessionStoreUtils.cpp
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Let SessionStoreUtils be a WebIDL namespace, rather than a XPCOM service
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9776
--HG--
rename : toolkit/components/sessionstore/nsISessionStoreUtils.idl => dom/chrome-webidl/SessionStoreUtils.webidl
rename : toolkit/components/sessionstore/nsSessionStoreUtils.cpp => toolkit/components/sessionstore/SessionStoreUtils.cpp
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The reasoning behind this is that with this change, removing a non-dynamic
docshell from the document dynamically shouldn't affect the indexes which we use
for both recording and restoring data in child docshells.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JIK8GBSWDEF
* * *
fixup
From c2cb8e33211348c36b1ce18bb62e6465fa46d3ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
The reasoning behind this is that with this change, removing a non-dynamic
docshell from the document dynamically shouldn't affect the indexes which we use
for both recording and restoring data in child docshells.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JIK8GBSWDEF
