There are some minor behavior changes come with this.
1) Change the default containing block size to (NS_UNCONSTRAINEDSIZE,
NS_UNCONSTRAINEDSIZE). I think this is more reasonable than (-1, -1).
2) mContainingBlockSize is used to cache only the block size passing
though constructor, Init(), or the invalid (-1, -1). This patch makes
it cache the value computed by ComputeContainingBlockRectangle().
Note that mContainingBlockSize is used only in
nsTableWrapperFrame::InitChildReflowInput() to set the inner table
frame's containing block to be the same as the outer table frame's.
We don't change this behavior by caching more. Because even if the
inner frame use the invalid cached (-1, -1) containing block size
from the outer reflow input, it still computes the block size again
in InitConstraints(). (Inner table's cb is the same as the outer
table's per InitCBReflowInput().)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28586
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is a follow-up for Part 1. I find all the candidates by running the
following command under layout/, and manually replace them.
ag -A 1 reflow$ | ag -B 1 state
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27162
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
A lot of files include `nsIPresShell.h` even though currently they don't
need it. This patch removes the unnecessary inclusions.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25744
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
A lot of files include `nsIPresShell.h` even though currently they don't
need it. This patch removes the unnecessary inclusions.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25744
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This also adopts the resolution from [1] while at it, making letter-spacing
compute to a length, serializing 0 to normal rather than keeping normal in the
computed value, which matches every other engine.
This removes the SMIL tests for percentages from letter-spacing since
letter-spacing does in fact not support percentages, so they were passing just
by chance.
[1]: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1484
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D21850
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Only nsBlockFrame and its subclasses recognize the nsIFrame::eBlockFrame
flag, so we can replace the usage of the flag with either
nsIFrame::IsBlockFrameOrSubclass() or a do_QueryFrame().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20542
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is more consistent with what the Rust bits of the style system do, and
removes a pointer from ComputedStyle which is always nice.
This also aligns the Rust bits with the C++ bits re. not treating xul pseudos as
anonymous boxes. See the comment in nsTreeStyleCache.cpp regarding those.
Can't wait for XUL trees to die.
Depends on D19001
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19002
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Really sorry for the size of the patch :(
Only intentional behavior change is in the uses of HasLengthAndPercentage(),
where it's easier to do the right thing. The checks that used to check for
(IsCalcUnit() && CalcHasPercentage()) are wrong since bug 957915.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19553
Also for the intersection observer root margin, since it was easier to fix it
up and clean it up than not doing it.
This is the first big step to get rid of nscoord. It duplicates a bit of logic
in nsLayoutUtils since for now max/min-width/height are still represented with
nsStyleCoord, but I think I prefer to land this incrementally.
I didn't add helpers for the physical accessors of the style rect sides that
nsStyleSides has (top/bottom/left/right) since I think we generally should
encourage the logical versions, but let me know if you want me to do that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17739
Doing it during layout instead. This also has the nice side-effect of
no longer needing to do a full restyle when counter-style rules are inserted.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D18343
This patch does not change behavior - it's purely an optimization to some
existing logic.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13132
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In order to get the correct computed value of these keywords, we have to
make sure we store the correct computed values in sizing properties in
both inline axis and block axis.
-moz-max-content and -moz-min-content should behave as the property's
initial value in block axis. -moz-fit-content and -moz-available are not
supported in block axis, so we also treat them as initial values.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8290
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Before bug 1308876, child frames marked themselves as dirty during reflow if
their parent was dirty, too. After bug 1308876, the point where dirtiness is
being propagated to a frame's descendants has been shifted: Now, dirty parents
are responsible for marking all their children as dirty, too, when the parent
starts reflowing.
This means that if a frame wants to mark a whole subtree as dirty *during its
own* reflow, it's no longer sufficient to just mark the root of the subtree as
dirty and then rely on all further children marking themselves as dirty as well
when reflow reaches them.
The font inflation code is one such case. When the font inflation data on a font
inflation flow root has become dirty, or we're resizing the top-level frame
(which because of the effective container width clamping from bug 707855 can
affect the font inflation font size as well), we now need to explicitly mark all
affected children as dirty.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5577
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Once again, calculating the amount of font size inflation isn't as expensive as
it used to be, but there's still no need to do it unnecessarily. The current
code does this unconditionally as part of computing a frame's margins
Additionally, calculating the font size inflation for frames that we don't
actually want to inflate also messes with the planned writing mode assertions
from bug 1428670. In some special cases (e.g. the scroll bars), a frame might
use a different writing mode (horizontal/vertical) than its parent without
creating a new font inflation flow root at the boundary. As long as we never
want to apply font size inflation for that frame this is okay, but if the margin
computation then runs the font inflation calculation regardless, we have a
problem.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D7329
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Before bug 1308876, child frames marked themselves as dirty during reflow if
their parent was dirty, too. After bug 1308876, the point where dirtiness is
being propagated to a frame's descendants has been shifted: Now, dirty parents
are responsible for marking all their children as dirty, too, when the parent
starts reflowing.
This means that if a frame wants to mark a whole subtree as dirty *during its
own* reflow, it's no longer sufficient to just mark the root of the subtree as
dirty and then rely on all further children marking themselves as dirty as well
when reflow reaches them.
The font inflation code is one such case. When the font inflation data on a font
inflation flow root has become dirty, or we're resizing the top-level frame
(which because of the effective container width clamping from bug 707855 can
affect the font inflation font size as well), we now need to explicitly mark all
affected children as dirty.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5577
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
