Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch introduces a new type of content process, which has a dynamic name.
This type of content process is labeled as `webIsolated=${SITE_ORIGIN}` and is
used within fission-enabled windows.
To enable this, additional information about the fission status of the target
window must be passed into E10SUtils. This was done by updating every call site
manually to pass an extra boolean. A better solution perhaps should be used in
the future.
With this patch enabled, we now perform process switches, but only when
navigating to HTTP URIs. If we navigate to a non-HTTP URI in an iframe with
fission enabled, it will not behave correctly. This must be done in a
follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29570
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When UrlbarInput.uninit is called after customize mode ends, uninit calls this.inputField.controllers.removeControllerAt(0), which is supposed to remove the input's CopyCutController inserted in the constructor. But the controller at index 0 at that point is not the CopyCutController. Instead it's some built-in controller that supports these commands (at least these): cmd_charPrevious, cmd_charPrevious, cmd_beginLine, cmd_endLine. (Verified by adding logging to nsXULControllers::GetControllerForCommand.) That's why arrow left/right and home/end don't work after ending customize mode.
The problem is that this.inputField.controllers in the constructor and this.inputField.controllers in uninit (when customize mode ends) are not the same. I wasn't able to track down why, but I'm guessing that the textbox or something in its state is being reset or cloned when customized mode ends or maybe right after it starts. The CopyCutController isn't in the controllers array at all on uninit. (Verified by adding support for cmd_adw and iterating through the controllers array, looking for a controller supporting cmd_adw.)
Note that urlbarBindings.xml has a try-catch around removeController(), I'm guessing for what turns out to be this reason: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/7944190ad1668a94223b950a19f1fffe8662d6b8/browser/base/content/urlbarBindings.xml#190
However, CopyCutController *is* in the controllers array when customize mode starts. So I added a new gURLBarHandler.customizeStart method that calls a new UrlbarInput.removeCopyCutController method.
Other things I tried or thought of doing:
Call gURLBarHandler._reset on customize start instead of end. Problem with that is that the UrlbarInput ends up getting immediately recreated because some other parts of the browser access gURLBar at that time. (Of course I replaced the `gURLBar = this.urlbar` assignment in _reset with another lazy getter definition.)
Just don't worry about removing CopyCutController at all. That seems bad because then we'd leak it, unless the controller is removed or the controllers array is emptied at some point by XUL, and I'm not at all certain about that. (Although I guess this is effectively what awesomebar does, given the link above!)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29613
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
nsITabParent is exposed to frontend code and is generally used as a representation of a remote tab. We could just rename the interface to nsIBrowserParent and worry about it later, but I think it's better to rename the interface to nsIRemoteTab so that we can later work on splitting the interface away from the PBrowser protocol.
Note: Some frontend code refers to a TabParentId. This commit renames this to RemoteTabId. We need to figure out the purpose of TabId with fission.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28132
--HG--
rename : dom/interfaces/base/nsITabParent.idl => dom/interfaces/base/nsIRemoteTab.idl
extra : rebase_source : 9d8a1790a7bb10195ad063644d1a93d63b2afb72
So it is still preventDefault()able once non-primary clicks aren't web visible.
Don't let browser.js' contentAreaClick handle any non-primary clicks.
ClickHandlerChild.jsm handles them first anyway. Can probably rip it out
entirely in another bug.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26791
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This code builds on top of the E10S "remote tabs" configuration system to add a
system for specifying that remote subframes should be used. Fission can be
enabled for a window by including the "fission" flag in options when opening
the window.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26560
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
