`background-size` per CSS-BACKGROUNDS § 3.9.
Nearest neighbor interpolation is used for `crisp-edges`, like Firefox.
A note has been added that we could do better if we wanted to.
Multiple backgrounds are not yet supported.
Rebase of #4368. Fixes#4368.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e1a50c771973fe3223cf98feea5d570375d68fa9
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Moved from #4544, because Critic.
Fixes#4544.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5cd6316addc1acf145ed3220719387ef6ef08d2f
Move culling of transparent display items to paint task rather than display list builder, so that hit testing detects mouse over on transparent background elements.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ac4a690e8fa98da4e4f7adbc2d888a94c6d99e0e
Ready for review.
Final link step on android fails, but we know how to fix it and will add it to this branch soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2cc08f289ab909de44fa09a07b2c43b70ce379b9
--HG--
rename : servo/ports/gonk/build.rs => servo/support/rust-task_info/build.rs
Fixes#4125
Conforming to section 5.5 (Rounded Corners/Overlapping Curves) of "CSS Background and Borders Module Level 3", border radii on elements whose border curves would have overlapped are uniformly scaled down to the point that they no longer do.
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-backgrounds/#corner-overlap
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 6dc2b895b877b2455ac8cbc5239b9c2f314f4fda
`background-blend-mode` is not yet supported because we don't support
multiple backgrounds yet.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e6fe9f14092251b0d1a8c97473dda9b5d73679cd
Content of the canvas is drawn, tests/html/test_canvas.html now works.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: da400a7a453eacf6f3089cc07e5dc61f385a0909
`blur` and `drop-shadow` are not yet supported, because the
`text-shadow` PR makes some fundamental changes to blur rendering that
are needed first.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ffdbf29db28ba334e8baf8d35141b5e8ad289459
This was making `box-shadow` not show up in many cases, in particular,
but the effects were not limited to that.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 499d17f564d699e5e290e8a3859f64e7536827a7
In particular, this contains changes to qualify enums where rust will require it, and to stop using some features that will be removed.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ba8cf6b0e6145265f9472d4855f078d8b5943fe7
Together these improve a large number of sites: GitHub, Reddit, Wikipedia, etc.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 63a7742d834e9ed44421baa3ce218a5eabce58bf
Only the recommended, comma-separated syntax is supported.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a80d88897d176630c79f929e8b1fd661b2e1a17c
I'm not sure how we want to handle Linux cursors, and GLFW has no
ability to set cursors (short of disabling it and managing it yourself).
If you test this in the wild you will probably hit #4357 until that PR lands.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e2267e0a0749e27046ee8a26ba514cc6865e0345
The exact rendering is ill-spec'd. Some things are ugly (especially the
width and height of list style images) but they are infrequently used
and I believe this implementation matches the spec. Numeric lists are
not supported yet, since they will require a separate layout pass.
The implementation is a subclass of `BlockFlow`, on advice from Robert
O'Callahan.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 112ef5c484e821aa4869aeaf12a12146f2424fe0
`invert` is not yet supported.
Objects that get layers will not yet display outlines properly. This is
because our overflow calculation doesn't take styles into account and
because layers are always anchored to the top left of the border box.
Since fixing this is work that is not related to outline *per se* I'm
leaving that to a followup and making a note in the code.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d31237f3439e5e5d4055b3a9e53eaeee4f3cdf2c
Now that content box queries are made against the flow tree, we can
remove PseudoDisplayItems from the display list.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d988d01dd01c4e7e1503667cdfe91d4663e2c916
#4275
* This changeset rename "render"/"rendering" to "paint"/"painting" under `components/`.
* This does not rename words which are used as general browser's working.
* So this doesn't change `reftest.rs`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0b486b12109ab765ecee4cbcc684e5d99e8ad5ad
--HG--
rename : servo/components/canvas/canvas_render_task.rs => servo/components/canvas/canvas_paint_task.rs
rename : servo/components/gfx/render_context.rs => servo/components/gfx/paint_context.rs
rename : servo/components/gfx/render_task.rs => servo/components/gfx/paint_task.rs
This adds the infrastructure necessary to support stacking contexts that
are not containing blocks for absolutely-positioned elements. Our
infrastructure did not support that before. This minor revamp actually
ended up simplifying the logic around display list building and
stacking-relative position computation for absolutely-positioned flows,
which was nice.
This will need this PR: https://github.com/servo/rust-azure/pull/112 I have not updated the Cargo.lock file yet because I want the merge commit.
r? @glennw
f? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 68c90e27970808bddcb8c8a4e782bd4405e67a5c
Attempt to solve #3690
I've re-rolled the changes from https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/2610, and then doen the necessary updates to get this to compile with the current snapshot of rust.
The documentation for values I've added in the bitflag are missing, because I don't know what is the appropriate text.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e13873bba1782580db4abe46e883b08da829cbb6
This implements the scheme described here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.servo/sZVPSfPVfkg
This commit changes Servo to generate one display list per stacking
context instead of one display list per layer. This is purely a
refactoring; there are no functional changes. Performance is essentially
the same as before. However, there should be numerous future benefits
that this is intended to allow for:
* It makes the code simpler to understand because the "new layer needed"
vs. "no new layer needed" code paths are more consolidated.
* It makes it easy to support CSS properties that did not fit into our
previous flat display list model (without unconditionally layerizing
them):
o `opacity` should be easy to support because the stacking context
provides the higher-level grouping of display items to which opacity
is to be applied.
o `transform` can be easily supported because the stacking context
provides a place to stash the transformation matrix. This has the side
benefit of nicely separating the transformation matrix from the
clipping regions.
* The `flatten` logic is now O(1) instead of O(n) and now only needs to
be invoked for pseudo-stacking contexts (right now: just floats),
instead of for every stacking context.
* Layers are now a proper tree instead of a flat list as far as layout
is concerned, bringing us closer to a production-quality
compositing/layers framework.
* This commit opens the door to incremental display list construction at
the level of stacking contexts.
Future performance improvements could come from optimizing allocation of
display list items, and, of course, incremental display list
construction.
r? @glennw
f? @mrobinson @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 397d8138e7b27541faf03d9635d7648416da4a75
Instead of creating a display list for the entire page, only create one
for an area that expands around the viewport. On my machine this makes
incremental layout of http://timecube.com 50% faster.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 26045d7fcbab8851fbefe2851cd904203f8fd8dd
This implements a subset of the CSS `linear-gradient` property per the
CSS-IMAGES specification:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-images-3/
The full syntax is parsed, but only the beginning and end color stops
are used, and gradients are clamped to the nearest 90 degrees. It should
not be architecturally difficult to add the remaining pieces, but in the
interests of bounding the size of this patch that work has been left to
follow-ups.
Improves GitHub.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ed22c9b35b64ccf7a68ed4f26b1eecfa39996efd
Instead of looking at the display tree, have ContentBox(es)Query consult
the flow tree. This allow optimizing away parts of the display tree
later. To do this we need to be more careful about how we send reflow
requests, only querying the flow tree when possible.
Fixes#3790.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c9089c45c4b7d40419233b48a192d85a8ad71c99
These were showing up really high in the maze solver profile.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9f248378f06d4de7c0df01b64e93edcc4de208cf
