Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Moved from #4544, because Critic.
Fixes#4544.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5cd6316addc1acf145ed3220719387ef6ef08d2f
When executing servo with proper flags (i.e. --debug dump-flow-tree), it should print the flow tree. We had the code, but it was commented.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2eb71bda83c175ec4af9aca4e22b74ef7fea9097
Ready for review.
Final link step on android fails, but we know how to fix it and will add it to this branch soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2cc08f289ab909de44fa09a07b2c43b70ce379b9
--HG--
rename : servo/ports/gonk/build.rs => servo/support/rust-task_info/build.rs
This was making `box-shadow` not show up in many cases, in particular,
but the effects were not limited to that.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 499d17f564d699e5e290e8a3859f64e7536827a7
Together these improve a large number of sites: GitHub, Reddit, Wikipedia, etc.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 63a7742d834e9ed44421baa3ce218a5eabce58bf
The rendering is still wrong beause of #2795, but at least we get a rendering.
(This test change is just for readability, it should be equivalent to before.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 3cc87165a1279005fa2c12413f33487dee31df96
The exact rendering is ill-spec'd. Some things are ugly (especially the
width and height of list style images) but they are infrequently used
and I believe this implementation matches the spec. Numeric lists are
not supported yet, since they will require a separate layout pass.
The implementation is a subclass of `BlockFlow`, on advice from Robert
O'Callahan.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 112ef5c484e821aa4869aeaf12a12146f2424fe0
I had to use a somewhat unconventional method of computing text
indentation (propagating from blocks down to inlines) because of the way
containing blocks are handled in Servo.
(As a side note, neither Gecko nor WebKit correctly handles percentages
in `text-align`, at least incrementally -- i.e. when the percentages are
relative to the viewport and the viewport is resized.)
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: be6612193786ef22810fd66b3ce244a7e66cbcf4
By "idempotent" I mean that later passes do not stomp on data from
earlier passes, so that we can run the passes individually for
incremental reflow. The main change here was to stop overwriting the
"minimum inline-size" field of each column with the column's computed
inline-size.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 909dd0e80f5c6a9051da6e2f70d77186cc545b1a
`invert` is not yet supported.
Objects that get layers will not yet display outlines properly. This is
because our overflow calculation doesn't take styles into account and
because layers are always anchored to the top left of the border box.
Since fixing this is work that is not related to outline *per se* I'm
leaving that to a followup and making a note in the code.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d31237f3439e5e5d4055b3a9e53eaeee4f3cdf2c
Fixes the blank spaces showing up in Wikipedia.
r? @kmcallister
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9afdce4405f0f5998c81eae83bbb527d0e95ec8e
Attempt to solve #3690
I've re-rolled the changes from https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/2610, and then doen the necessary updates to get this to compile with the current snapshot of rust.
The documentation for values I've added in the bitflag are missing, because I don't know what is the appropriate text.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e13873bba1782580db4abe46e883b08da829cbb6
This implements the scheme described here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.servo/sZVPSfPVfkg
This commit changes Servo to generate one display list per stacking
context instead of one display list per layer. This is purely a
refactoring; there are no functional changes. Performance is essentially
the same as before. However, there should be numerous future benefits
that this is intended to allow for:
* It makes the code simpler to understand because the "new layer needed"
vs. "no new layer needed" code paths are more consolidated.
* It makes it easy to support CSS properties that did not fit into our
previous flat display list model (without unconditionally layerizing
them):
o `opacity` should be easy to support because the stacking context
provides the higher-level grouping of display items to which opacity
is to be applied.
o `transform` can be easily supported because the stacking context
provides a place to stash the transformation matrix. This has the side
benefit of nicely separating the transformation matrix from the
clipping regions.
* The `flatten` logic is now O(1) instead of O(n) and now only needs to
be invoked for pseudo-stacking contexts (right now: just floats),
instead of for every stacking context.
* Layers are now a proper tree instead of a flat list as far as layout
is concerned, bringing us closer to a production-quality
compositing/layers framework.
* This commit opens the door to incremental display list construction at
the level of stacking contexts.
Future performance improvements could come from optimizing allocation of
display list items, and, of course, incremental display list
construction.
r? @glennw
f? @mrobinson @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 397d8138e7b27541faf03d9635d7648416da4a75
Instead of looking at the display tree, have ContentBox(es)Query consult
the flow tree. This allow optimizing away parts of the display tree
later. To do this we need to be more careful about how we send reflow
requests, only querying the flow tree when possible.
Fixes#3790.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c9089c45c4b7d40419233b48a192d85a8ad71c99
This is the last PR and most of the work for the maze solver and RoboHornet.
r? @glennw
cc @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 035ff19e4a5995989c5fd34928af2a6690bb8062
These were showing up really high in the maze solver profile.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9f248378f06d4de7c0df01b64e93edcc4de208cf
These should have no effect on functionality.
r? @metajack
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4bdd9a5ec02526b9a407b23dcbf95cc570e6fa56
`layout::fragment` and `layout::block` were getting too big.
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 01f6a8102dfbb7eaef564acf8891088011905b59
When this option is enabled, the layout task will print an error when
display list items draw outside their owning Flow's position rect. This
will make it easier to detect layout errors before they break rendering.
This is a command-line option for the moment, because we violate this
rule quite a bit still. Once all bugs causing this are fixed, we can be
more aggressive about enabling the option.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f5ad89f927864ba4f1cbb409b8b0e3b38febef76
This also enables incremental reflow by default. \o/
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f6941b35e3b945f4a6dcd2cf03daa345ad2bcaed
This also adds some extra debugging infrastructure which I found useful tracking
this bug down. A regression in the br reftests is also uncovered by this patch,
which I'll work on fixing next.
EDIT: nevermind. no regression, I just tested that before a rebase.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b86344b697f814b982e52f4a72c26d58c915c37b
This patch switches FlowRefs to using the Deref and DerefMut traits, instead of
the custom `get` and `get_mut` functions.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 6a11ee89de82abae9d6607a6c2890692df5259eb
Now that DOM/Flow traversals have been refactored out, the `recalc_style_for_subtree`
function in `css/matching.rs` can be removed, in lieu of just running the standard
`recalc_style_for_node` and `construct_flows` traversals sequentially. Now we
no longer have the maintenance headache of duplicating selector matching logic
in two places! \o/
This passes reftests with both default arguments, and with `-y 1`.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7eaeaeeb217e7cbd083fe318863e7de4b9f38e2b
This also hides the not-yet-working parts of incremental reflow behind a runtime
flag. As I get the failing reftests passing, I'll send pull requests for them one
by one.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 56989b8dec4aa95a3b484d45f15b23f9b3daaf13
http://dbaron.org/css/intrinsic/
Column spans are not yet supported.
This effectively adds support for percentage widths, and it also fixes
many bugs, improving the layout of Google and Wikipedia.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e2d7777c41135b71293c195d2a9d7a1bc2afd0ca
This implements a general framework for legacy presentational attributes
to the DOM and style calculation, so that adding more of them later will
be straightforward.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0aeecfc41d5f0c637960fcddf87cc2db3e5efeea
We push down clipping areas during absolute position calculation. This
makes display items into a flat list, improving cache locality. It
dramatically simplifies the code all around.
Because we need to push down clip rects even for absolutely-positioned
children of non-absolutely-positioned flows, this patch alters the
parallel traversal to compute absolute positions for
absolutely-positioned children at the same time it computes absolute
positions for other children. This doesn't seem to break anything either
in theory (since the overall order remains correct) or in practice. It
simplifies the parallel traversal code quite a bit.
See the relevant Gecko bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615734
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fd70b366aeada7f8cb4b2457c04fd07f0ea9b143
This makes layout more idempotent, which is important for incremental
layout.
Also converts `is_root` to a set of flags and fixes a `TODO` concerning
percentage inline heights of images.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7902ccf8507a7ec31515bfb5824dc4727564fe4d
This patch puts in the initial framework for incremental reflow. Nodes' styles
are no longer recalculated unless the node has changed.
I've been hacking on the general problem of incremental reflow for the past
couple weeks, and I've yet to get a full implementation that actually passes all
the reftests + wikipedia + cnn. Therefore, I'm going to try to land the different
parts of it one by one.
This patch only does incremental style recalc, without incremental flow
construction, inline-size bubbling, reflow, or display lists. Those will be coming
in that order as I finish them.
At least with this strategy, I can land a working version of incremental reflow,
even if not yet complete.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 85b277655f07db1cb99c4d3dee93804735ed0470
