2a7f262b7df8761261a0fa618394f4e991733a5e was unsufficient for the case where
the interleaved output was actually on stderr rather than stdout, such as
output from the error macro.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 522ebe7a3bd55d4572b670fa32ffc9979b3f7a74
Fix for issue #6768.
Merge common fields of ReadData and BlobBody to avoid passing redundant information to functions.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ac533b146660922d7d4e6f1836f189a63334df65
…s for frame treese in script tasks.
This underreports by a significant amount, since only Document, Window and CharacterData (ie. text) nodes are fully represented. That being said, every HTML element in the tree is measured, but only counted as a Node. It's easy to improve this, it just requires adding the appropriate HeapSizeOf derives and increasing the granularity of `measure_memory_for_eventtarget`. google.com shows a dom-tree value of 0.24 MB for me at the moment.
r? @nnethercote
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 84e25befdd97cf74fb00707dbe150d59d980e977
We use alert() to communicate test results to wptrunner. Unfortunately,
sometimes the alert output is interleaved with other output on stdout,
causing wptrunner to classify the test result as a timeout. I hope this will
avoid that scenario.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 86476804cac668133b6964c8f551918163aa66d7
It's not possible to correctly determine during the css cascade whether the container height
is explicitly specified. Additionally, the spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#the-height-property says this should affect the *used* height, rather than the computed height.
This significantly improves the layout in #6643.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 028707f5cd3263fd1476669207f67d5b9d5d4806
Transitions make the reasoning in the comment in the relevant sections
not true.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0c6e271cd3d5e2a7f141cae811d92b8fd6370b18
For now, this just gives some purpose to the abandoned receiver and later selects over the two receivers (for #6767). (oh wait, forgot to check the local build - there are still a few errors)...
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: effb17b3368769baaf5247908b26b7f0dd370ea3
Need to update to new string-cache first, which I think requires a rustup?
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9a2f28ae33efd5216b0e1933bf186ad2fadba137
This change makes Servo use serialized messages over IPC channels for resource loading. The goal is to make it easier to make Servo multiprocess in the future. This patch does not make Servo multiprocess now; there are many other channels that need to be changed to IPC before that can happen. It does introduce a dependency on https://github.com/serde-rs/serde and https://github.com/pcwalton/ipc-channel for the first time.
At the moment, `ipc-channel` uses JSON for serialization. This is because serde does not yet have official support for bincode. When serde gains support for bincode, I'll switch to that. For now, however, the JSON encoding and decoding will constitute a significant performance regression in resource loading.
To avoid having to send boxed `AsyncResponseTarget` trait objects across process boundaries, this series of commits changes `AsyncResponseTarget` to wrap a sender only. It is then the client's responsibility to spawn a thread to proxy calls from that sender to the consumer of the resource data. This only had to be done in a few places. In the future, we may want to collapse those threads into one per process to reduce overhead. (It is impossible to continue to use `AsyncResponseTarget` as a boxed trait object across processes, regardless of how much work is done on `ipc-channel`. Vtables are fundamentally incompatible with IPC across mutually untrusting processes.)
In general, I was pretty pleased with how this turned out. The main changes are adding serialization functionality to various objects that `serde` does not know how to serialize natively—the most complicated being Hyper objects—and reworking `AsyncResponseTarget`. The overall structure of the code is unchanged, and other than `AsyncResponseTarget` no functionality was lost in moving to serialization and IPC.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2eb122f394651232abd683fc576a5c4288bf277f
StrExt::slice_chars is deprecated and will be removed in Rust. This
lifts the implementation from Rust libstd and puts it in util::str.
This fixes a bunch of deprecation warnings in Servo.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a54404c92180b839d2cf089d9ec9a6afe8bd5ba3
Continued from #6536
The current implementations of `ChildNode::before` and
`ChildNode::after` do not match the WHATWG spec. This commit updates the
implementations to match the spec.
Our current implementation of `ChildNode::after` passes all the WPT
tests. So I made sure to add a regression test that failed with the
current implementation. There are a few other unit tests I added
to exhaust other corner cases I encountered.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5873a5cf20b3db0fce59980b2a6b0b7b9da1e737
It's not quite done but can probably be reviewed anyway.
I still need to finish up a few of the ToCss impls, I just got lazy and wanted to make sure things worked.
The computation of the used values is definitely not right, I'm going to investigate that.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: acbca7b3aaf18866f7a1a79d9684149897bf4305
Fix for #6754.
cc @jdm – I believe this is all that's required for the fix, but until I get a better sense of #6813, I'm unsure of the best way to test this.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8b7120012a5f5eed71236fcf5d546ae76837ea11
The unsafety was fixed as part of the SpiderMonkey upgrade; this removes the
now unused annotation.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7adc336aaacfb5e544a9c8c4e0387afa457e5d72
