mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-11-01 00:58:39 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	sched/fair: Make EAS wakeup placement consider uclamp restrictions
task_fits_capacity() has just been made uclamp-aware, and
find_energy_efficient_cpu() needs to go through the same treatment.
Things are somewhat different here however - using the task max clamp isn't
sufficient. Consider the following setup:
  The target runqueue, rq:
    rq.cpu_capacity_orig = 512
    rq.cfs.avg.util_avg = 200
    rq.uclamp.max = 768 // the max p.uclamp.max of all enqueued p's is 768
  The waking task, p (not yet enqueued on rq):
    p.util_est = 600
    p.uclamp.max = 100
Now, consider the following code which doesn't use the rq clamps:
  util = uclamp_task_util(p);
  // Does the task fit in the spare CPU capacity?
  cpu = cpu_of(rq);
  fits_capacity(util, cpu_capacity(cpu) - cpu_util(cpu))
This would lead to:
  util = 100;
  fits_capacity(100, 512 - 200)
fits_capacity() would return true. However, enqueuing p on that CPU *will*
cause it to become overutilized since rq clamp values are max-aggregated,
so we'd remain with
  rq.uclamp.max = 768
which comes from the other tasks already enqueued on rq. Thus, we could
select a high enough frequency to reach beyond 0.8 * 512 utilization
(== overutilized) after enqueuing p on rq. What find_energy_efficient_cpu()
needs here is uclamp_rq_util_with() which lets us peek at the future
utilization landscape, including rq-wide uclamp values.
Make find_energy_efficient_cpu() use uclamp_rq_util_with() for its
fits_capacity() check. This is in line with what compute_energy() ends up
using for estimating utilization.
Tested-By: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211113851.24241-6-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									a7008c07a5
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						1d42509e47
					
				
					 1 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -6273,9 +6273,18 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu) | |||
| 			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr)) | ||||
| 				continue; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 			/* Skip CPUs that will be overutilized. */ | ||||
| 			util = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, cpu); | ||||
| 			cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu); | ||||
| 			spare_cap = cpu_cap - util; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 			/*
 | ||||
| 			 * Skip CPUs that cannot satisfy the capacity request. | ||||
| 			 * IOW, placing the task there would make the CPU | ||||
| 			 * overutilized. Take uclamp into account to see how | ||||
| 			 * much capacity we can get out of the CPU; this is | ||||
| 			 * aligned with schedutil_cpu_util(). | ||||
| 			 */ | ||||
| 			util = uclamp_rq_util_with(cpu_rq(cpu), util, p); | ||||
| 			if (!fits_capacity(util, cpu_cap)) | ||||
| 				continue; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -6290,7 +6299,6 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu) | |||
| 			 * Find the CPU with the maximum spare capacity in | ||||
| 			 * the performance domain | ||||
| 			 */ | ||||
| 			spare_cap = cpu_cap - util; | ||||
| 			if (spare_cap > max_spare_cap) { | ||||
| 				max_spare_cap = spare_cap; | ||||
| 				max_spare_cap_cpu = cpu; | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Valentin Schneider
						Valentin Schneider