mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-11-01 17:18:25 +02:00
sched/fair: Make EAS wakeup placement consider uclamp restrictions
task_fits_capacity() has just been made uclamp-aware, and
find_energy_efficient_cpu() needs to go through the same treatment.
Things are somewhat different here however - using the task max clamp isn't
sufficient. Consider the following setup:
The target runqueue, rq:
rq.cpu_capacity_orig = 512
rq.cfs.avg.util_avg = 200
rq.uclamp.max = 768 // the max p.uclamp.max of all enqueued p's is 768
The waking task, p (not yet enqueued on rq):
p.util_est = 600
p.uclamp.max = 100
Now, consider the following code which doesn't use the rq clamps:
util = uclamp_task_util(p);
// Does the task fit in the spare CPU capacity?
cpu = cpu_of(rq);
fits_capacity(util, cpu_capacity(cpu) - cpu_util(cpu))
This would lead to:
util = 100;
fits_capacity(100, 512 - 200)
fits_capacity() would return true. However, enqueuing p on that CPU *will*
cause it to become overutilized since rq clamp values are max-aggregated,
so we'd remain with
rq.uclamp.max = 768
which comes from the other tasks already enqueued on rq. Thus, we could
select a high enough frequency to reach beyond 0.8 * 512 utilization
(== overutilized) after enqueuing p on rq. What find_energy_efficient_cpu()
needs here is uclamp_rq_util_with() which lets us peek at the future
utilization landscape, including rq-wide uclamp values.
Make find_energy_efficient_cpu() use uclamp_rq_util_with() for its
fits_capacity() check. This is in line with what compute_energy() ends up
using for estimating utilization.
Tested-By: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211113851.24241-6-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a7008c07a5
commit
1d42509e47
1 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -6273,9 +6273,18 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
|
|||
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Skip CPUs that will be overutilized. */
|
||||
util = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, cpu);
|
||||
cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu);
|
||||
spare_cap = cpu_cap - util;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Skip CPUs that cannot satisfy the capacity request.
|
||||
* IOW, placing the task there would make the CPU
|
||||
* overutilized. Take uclamp into account to see how
|
||||
* much capacity we can get out of the CPU; this is
|
||||
* aligned with schedutil_cpu_util().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
util = uclamp_rq_util_with(cpu_rq(cpu), util, p);
|
||||
if (!fits_capacity(util, cpu_cap))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -6290,7 +6299,6 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
|
|||
* Find the CPU with the maximum spare capacity in
|
||||
* the performance domain
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spare_cap = cpu_cap - util;
|
||||
if (spare_cap > max_spare_cap) {
|
||||
max_spare_cap = spare_cap;
|
||||
max_spare_cap_cpu = cpu;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue