mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-11-04 02:30:34 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	docs: Update references to netdev-FAQ
File 'Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt' has been converted to RST format. We should update all links/references to point to the new file. Update references to netdev-FAQ Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									96398ddf63
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						287f4fa99a
					
				
					 2 changed files with 10 additions and 13 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ into the bpf-next tree will make their way into net-next tree. net and
 | 
			
		|||
net-next are both run by David S. Miller. From there, they will go
 | 
			
		||||
into the kernel mainline tree run by Linus Torvalds. To read up on the
 | 
			
		||||
process of net and net-next being merged into the mainline tree, see
 | 
			
		||||
the `netdev FAQ`_ under:
 | 
			
		||||
the :ref:`netdev-FAQ`
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 `Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt`_
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Occasionally, to prevent merge conflicts, we might send pull requests
 | 
			
		||||
to other trees (e.g. tracing) with a small subset of the patches, but
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ request)::
 | 
			
		|||
Q: How do I indicate which tree (bpf vs. bpf-next) my patch should be applied to?
 | 
			
		||||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
A: The process is the very same as described in the `netdev FAQ`_, so
 | 
			
		||||
please read up on it. The subject line must indicate whether the
 | 
			
		||||
A: The process is the very same as described in the :ref:`netdev-FAQ`,
 | 
			
		||||
so please read up on it. The subject line must indicate whether the
 | 
			
		||||
patch is a fix or rather "next-like" content in order to let the
 | 
			
		||||
maintainers know whether it is targeted at bpf or bpf-next.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ ii) run extensive BPF test suite and
 | 
			
		|||
Once the BPF pull request was accepted by David S. Miller, then
 | 
			
		||||
the patches end up in net or net-next tree, respectively, and
 | 
			
		||||
make their way from there further into mainline. Again, see the
 | 
			
		||||
`netdev FAQ`_ for additional information e.g. on how often they are
 | 
			
		||||
:ref:`netdev-FAQ` for additional information e.g. on how often they are
 | 
			
		||||
merged to mainline.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Q: How long do I need to wait for feedback on my BPF patches?
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ Q: Are patches applied to bpf-next when the merge window is open?
 | 
			
		|||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 | 
			
		||||
A: For the time when the merge window is open, bpf-next will not be
 | 
			
		||||
processed. This is roughly analogous to net-next patch processing,
 | 
			
		||||
so feel free to read up on the `netdev FAQ`_ about further details.
 | 
			
		||||
so feel free to read up on the :ref:`netdev-FAQ` about further details.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
During those two weeks of merge window, we might ask you to resend
 | 
			
		||||
your patch series once bpf-next is open again. Once Linus released
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ netdev kernel mailing list in Cc and ask for the fix to be queued up:
 | 
			
		|||
  netdev@vger.kernel.org
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
The process in general is the same as on netdev itself, see also the
 | 
			
		||||
`netdev FAQ`_ document.
 | 
			
		||||
:ref:`netdev-FAQ`.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Q: Do you also backport to kernels not currently maintained as stable?
 | 
			
		||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -388,9 +388,7 @@ Q: The BPF patch I am about to submit needs to go to stable as well
 | 
			
		|||
What should I do?
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
A: The same rules apply as with netdev patch submissions in general, see
 | 
			
		||||
`netdev FAQ`_ under:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
  `Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt`_
 | 
			
		||||
the :ref:`netdev-FAQ`.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Never add "``Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org``" to the patch description, but
 | 
			
		||||
ask the BPF maintainers to queue the patches instead. This can be done
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -630,8 +628,7 @@ when:
 | 
			
		|||
.. Links
 | 
			
		||||
.. _Documentation/process/: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/
 | 
			
		||||
.. _MAINTAINERS: ../../MAINTAINERS
 | 
			
		||||
.. _Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt: ../networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
 | 
			
		||||
.. _netdev FAQ: ../networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
 | 
			
		||||
.. _netdev-FAQ: ../networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
 | 
			
		||||
.. _samples/bpf/: ../../samples/bpf/
 | 
			
		||||
.. _selftests: ../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
 | 
			
		||||
.. _Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst:
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree
 | 
			
		|||
 | 
			
		||||
 - If the patch covers files in net/ or drivers/net please follow netdev stable
 | 
			
		||||
   submission guidelines as described in
 | 
			
		||||
   Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
 | 
			
		||||
   :ref:`Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst <netdev-FAQ>`
 | 
			
		||||
 - Security patches should not be handled (solely) by the -stable review
 | 
			
		||||
   process but should follow the procedures in
 | 
			
		||||
   :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst <securitybugs>`.
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue