mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-11-04 10:40:15 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	bpf: Make dst_port field in struct bpf_sock 16-bit wide
Menglong Dong reports that the documentation for the dst_port field in
struct bpf_sock is inaccurate and confusing. From the BPF program PoV, the
field is a zero-padded 16-bit integer in network byte order. The value
appears to the BPF user as if laid out in memory as so:
  offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) + 0  <port MSB>
                                      + 8  <port LSB>
                                      +16  0x00
                                      +24  0x00
32-, 16-, and 8-bit wide loads from the field are all allowed, but only if
the offset into the field is 0.
32-bit wide loads from dst_port are especially confusing. The loaded value,
after converting to host byte order with bpf_ntohl(dst_port), contains the
port number in the upper 16-bits.
Remove the confusion by splitting the field into two 16-bit fields. For
backward compatibility, allow 32-bit wide loads from offsetof(struct
bpf_sock, dst_port).
While at it, allow loads 8-bit loads at offset [0] and [1] from dst_port.
Reported-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130115518.213259-2-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									b3dddab2ff
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						4421a58271
					
				
					 2 changed files with 11 additions and 2 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -5574,7 +5574,8 @@ struct bpf_sock {
 | 
			
		|||
	__u32 src_ip4;
 | 
			
		||||
	__u32 src_ip6[4];
 | 
			
		||||
	__u32 src_port;		/* host byte order */
 | 
			
		||||
	__u32 dst_port;		/* network byte order */
 | 
			
		||||
	__be16 dst_port;	/* network byte order */
 | 
			
		||||
	__u16 :16;		/* zero padding */
 | 
			
		||||
	__u32 dst_ip4;
 | 
			
		||||
	__u32 dst_ip6[4];
 | 
			
		||||
	__u32 state;
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -8265,6 +8265,7 @@ bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 | 
			
		|||
			      struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
 | 
			
		||||
{
 | 
			
		||||
	const int size_default = sizeof(__u32);
 | 
			
		||||
	int field_size;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct bpf_sock))
 | 
			
		||||
		return false;
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -8276,7 +8277,6 @@ bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 | 
			
		|||
	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, family):
 | 
			
		||||
	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type):
 | 
			
		||||
	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, protocol):
 | 
			
		||||
	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port):
 | 
			
		||||
	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port):
 | 
			
		||||
	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, rx_queue_mapping):
 | 
			
		||||
	case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4):
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -8285,6 +8285,14 @@ bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 | 
			
		|||
	case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct bpf_sock, dst_ip6[0], dst_ip6[3]):
 | 
			
		||||
		bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, size_default);
 | 
			
		||||
		return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, size_default);
 | 
			
		||||
	case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock, dst_port):
 | 
			
		||||
		field_size = size == size_default ?
 | 
			
		||||
			size_default : sizeof_field(struct bpf_sock, dst_port);
 | 
			
		||||
		bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, field_size);
 | 
			
		||||
		return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, field_size);
 | 
			
		||||
	case offsetofend(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) ...
 | 
			
		||||
	     offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_ip4) - 1:
 | 
			
		||||
		return false;
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	return size == size_default;
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue