mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-10-30 16:18:41 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	rseq: Use get_user/put_user rather than __get_user/__put_user
__get_user()/__put_user() is used to read values for address ranges that
were already checked with access_ok() on rseq registration.
It has been recognized that __get_user/__put_user are optimizing the
wrong thing. Replace them by get_user/put_user across rseq instead.
If those end up showing up in benchmarks, the proper approach would be to
use user_access_begin() / unsafe_{get,put}_user() / user_access_end()
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Chris Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180709195155.7654-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									e96d71359e
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						8f28177014
					
				
					 1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -85,9 +85,9 @@ static int rseq_update_cpu_id(struct task_struct *t) | |||
| { | ||||
| 	u32 cpu_id = raw_smp_processor_id(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (__put_user(cpu_id, &t->rseq->cpu_id_start)) | ||||
| 	if (put_user(cpu_id, &t->rseq->cpu_id_start)) | ||||
| 		return -EFAULT; | ||||
| 	if (__put_user(cpu_id, &t->rseq->cpu_id)) | ||||
| 	if (put_user(cpu_id, &t->rseq->cpu_id)) | ||||
| 		return -EFAULT; | ||||
| 	trace_rseq_update(t); | ||||
| 	return 0; | ||||
|  | @ -100,14 +100,14 @@ static int rseq_reset_rseq_cpu_id(struct task_struct *t) | |||
| 	/*
 | ||||
| 	 * Reset cpu_id_start to its initial state (0). | ||||
| 	 */ | ||||
| 	if (__put_user(cpu_id_start, &t->rseq->cpu_id_start)) | ||||
| 	if (put_user(cpu_id_start, &t->rseq->cpu_id_start)) | ||||
| 		return -EFAULT; | ||||
| 	/*
 | ||||
| 	 * Reset cpu_id to RSEQ_CPU_ID_UNINITIALIZED, so any user coming | ||||
| 	 * in after unregistration can figure out that rseq needs to be | ||||
| 	 * registered again. | ||||
| 	 */ | ||||
| 	if (__put_user(cpu_id, &t->rseq->cpu_id)) | ||||
| 	if (put_user(cpu_id, &t->rseq->cpu_id)) | ||||
| 		return -EFAULT; | ||||
| 	return 0; | ||||
| } | ||||
|  | @ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int rseq_get_rseq_cs(struct task_struct *t, struct rseq_cs *rseq_cs) | |||
| 	u32 sig; | ||||
| 	int ret; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	ret = __get_user(ptr, &t->rseq->rseq_cs); | ||||
| 	ret = get_user(ptr, &t->rseq->rseq_cs); | ||||
| 	if (ret) | ||||
| 		return ret; | ||||
| 	if (!ptr) { | ||||
|  | @ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static int rseq_need_restart(struct task_struct *t, u32 cs_flags) | |||
| 	int ret; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	/* Get thread flags. */ | ||||
| 	ret = __get_user(flags, &t->rseq->flags); | ||||
| 	ret = get_user(flags, &t->rseq->flags); | ||||
| 	if (ret) | ||||
| 		return ret; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int clear_rseq_cs(struct task_struct *t) | |||
| 	 * | ||||
| 	 * Set rseq_cs to NULL with single-copy atomicity. | ||||
| 	 */ | ||||
| 	return __put_user(0UL, &t->rseq->rseq_cs); | ||||
| 	return put_user(0UL, &t->rseq->rseq_cs); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| /*
 | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Mathieu Desnoyers
						Mathieu Desnoyers