mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-10-31 16:48:26 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	futex: Handle transient "ownerless" rtmutex state correctly
Gratian managed to trigger the BUG_ON(!newowner) in fixup_pi_state_owner().
This is one possible chain of events leading to this:
Task Prio       Operation
T1   120	lock(F)
T2   120	lock(F)   -> blocks (top waiter)
T3   50 (RT)	lock(F)   -> boosts T1 and blocks (new top waiter)
XX   		timeout/  -> wakes T2
		signal
T1   50		unlock(F) -> wakes T3 (rtmutex->owner == NULL, waiter bit is set)
T2   120	cleanup   -> try_to_take_mutex() fails because T3 is the top waiter
     			     and the lower priority T2 cannot steal the lock.
     			  -> fixup_pi_state_owner() sees newowner == NULL -> BUG_ON()
The comment states that this is invalid and rt_mutex_real_owner() must
return a non NULL owner when the trylock failed, but in case of a queued
and woken up waiter rt_mutex_real_owner() == NULL is a valid transient
state. The higher priority waiter has simply not yet managed to take over
the rtmutex.
The BUG_ON() is therefore wrong and this is just another retry condition in
fixup_pi_state_owner().
Drop the locks, so that T3 can make progress, and then try the fixup again.
Gratian provided a great analysis, traces and a reproducer. The analysis is
to the point, but it confused the hell out of that tglx dude who had to
page in all the futex horrors again. Condensed version is above.
[ tglx: Wrote comment and changelog ]
Fixes: c1e2f0eaf0 ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")
Reported-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a6w6x7bb.fsf@ni.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sg9pkvf7.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									3cea11cd5e
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						9f5d1c336a
					
				
					 1 changed files with 14 additions and 2 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -2380,10 +2380,22 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, | |||
| 		} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 		/*
 | ||||
| 		 * Since we just failed the trylock; there must be an owner. | ||||
| 		 * The trylock just failed, so either there is an owner or | ||||
| 		 * there is a higher priority waiter than this one. | ||||
| 		 */ | ||||
| 		newowner = rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex); | ||||
| 		BUG_ON(!newowner); | ||||
| 		/*
 | ||||
| 		 * If the higher priority waiter has not yet taken over the | ||||
| 		 * rtmutex then newowner is NULL. We can't return here with | ||||
| 		 * that state because it's inconsistent vs. the user space | ||||
| 		 * state. So drop the locks and try again. It's a valid | ||||
| 		 * situation and not any different from the other retry | ||||
| 		 * conditions. | ||||
| 		 */ | ||||
| 		if (unlikely(!newowner)) { | ||||
| 			err = -EAGAIN; | ||||
| 			goto handle_err; | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 	} else { | ||||
| 		WARN_ON_ONCE(argowner != current); | ||||
| 		if (oldowner == current) { | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Mike Galbraith
						Mike Galbraith