mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-11-04 10:40:15 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	PM / Runtime: Don't allow to suspend a device with an active child
When resuming a device in __pm_runtime_set_status(), the prerequisite is that its parent must already be active, else an error code is returned and the device's status remains suspended. When suspending a device there is no similar constraints being validated. Let's change this to make the behaviour consistent, by not allowing to suspend a device with an active child, unless it has been explicitly set to ignore its children. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									8812872960
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						a8636c8964
					
				
					 1 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -1028,7 +1028,17 @@ int __pm_runtime_set_status(struct device *dev, unsigned int status)
 | 
			
		|||
		goto out_set;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	if (status == RPM_SUSPENDED) {
 | 
			
		||||
		/* It always is possible to set the status to 'suspended'. */
 | 
			
		||||
		/*
 | 
			
		||||
		 * It is invalid to suspend a device with an active child,
 | 
			
		||||
		 * unless it has been set to ignore its children.
 | 
			
		||||
		 */
 | 
			
		||||
		if (!dev->power.ignore_children &&
 | 
			
		||||
			atomic_read(&dev->power.child_count)) {
 | 
			
		||||
			dev_err(dev, "runtime PM trying to suspend device but active child\n");
 | 
			
		||||
			error = -EBUSY;
 | 
			
		||||
			goto out;
 | 
			
		||||
		}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		if (parent) {
 | 
			
		||||
			atomic_add_unless(&parent->power.child_count, -1, 0);
 | 
			
		||||
			notify_parent = !parent->power.ignore_children;
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue