mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-11-04 10:40:15 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	doc: Update control-dependencies section of memory-barriers.txt
In the following example, if MAX is defined to be 1, then the compiler
knows (Q % MAX) is equal to zero.  The compiler can therefore throw
away the "then" branch (and the "if"), retaining only the "else" branch.
	q = READ_ONCE(a);
	if (q % MAX) {
		WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
		do_something();
	} else {
		WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
		do_something_else();
	}
It is therefore necessary to modify the example like this:
        q = READ_ONCE(a);
-       WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
+       WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
        do_something_else();
Signed-off-by: pierre Kuo <vichy.kuo@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									d3d3a3ccc4
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						b26cfc48e3
					
				
					 1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
					@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ equal to zero, in which case the compiler is within its rights to
 | 
				
			||||||
transform the above code into the following:
 | 
					transform the above code into the following:
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
	q = READ_ONCE(a);
 | 
						q = READ_ONCE(a);
 | 
				
			||||||
	WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
 | 
						WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
 | 
				
			||||||
	do_something_else();
 | 
						do_something_else();
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
Given this transformation, the CPU is not required to respect the ordering
 | 
					Given this transformation, the CPU is not required to respect the ordering
 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue