mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-10-31 16:48:26 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work
During rcu_read_unlock_special(), if this happens during irq_exit(), we
can lockup if an IPI is issued. This is because the IPI itself triggers
the irq_exit() path causing a recursive lock up.
This is precisely what Xiongfeng found when invoking a BPF program on
the trace_tick_stop() tracepoint As shown in the trace below. Fix by
managing the irq_work state correctly.
irq_exit()
  __irq_exit_rcu()
    /* in_hardirq() returns false after this */
    preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET)
    tick_irq_exit()
      tick_nohz_irq_exit()
	    tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick()
	      trace_tick_stop()  /* a bpf prog is hooked on this trace point */
		   __bpf_trace_tick_stop()
		      bpf_trace_run2()
			    rcu_read_unlock_special()
                              /* will send a IPI to itself */
			      irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->defer_qs_iw, rdp->cpu);
A simple reproducer can also be obtained by doing the following in
tick_irq_exit(). It will hang on boot without the patch:
  static inline void tick_irq_exit(void)
  {
 +	rcu_read_lock();
 +	WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs, true);
 +	rcu_read_unlock();
 +
Reported-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9acd5f9f-6732-7701-6880-4b51190aa070@huawei.com/
Tested-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
[neeraj: Apply Frederic's suggested fix for PREEMPT_RT]
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									d827673d8a
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						b41642c877
					
				
					 2 changed files with 38 additions and 12 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -174,6 +174,17 @@ struct rcu_snap_record { | |||
| 	unsigned long   jiffies;	/* Track jiffies value */ | ||||
| }; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| /*
 | ||||
|  * An IRQ work (deferred_qs_iw) is used by RCU to get the scheduler's attention. | ||||
|  * to report quiescent states at the soonest possible time. | ||||
|  * The request can be in one of the following states: | ||||
|  * - DEFER_QS_IDLE: An IRQ work is yet to be scheduled. | ||||
|  * - DEFER_QS_PENDING: An IRQ work was scheduled but either not yet run, or it | ||||
|  *                     ran and we still haven't reported a quiescent state. | ||||
|  */ | ||||
| #define DEFER_QS_IDLE		0 | ||||
| #define DEFER_QS_PENDING	1 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| /* Per-CPU data for read-copy update. */ | ||||
| struct rcu_data { | ||||
| 	/* 1) quiescent-state and grace-period handling : */ | ||||
|  | @ -192,7 +203,7 @@ struct rcu_data { | |||
| 					/*  during and after the last grace */ | ||||
| 					/* period it is aware of. */ | ||||
| 	struct irq_work defer_qs_iw;	/* Obtain later scheduler attention. */ | ||||
| 	bool defer_qs_iw_pending;	/* Scheduler attention pending? */ | ||||
| 	int defer_qs_iw_pending;	/* Scheduler attention pending? */ | ||||
| 	struct work_struct strict_work;	/* Schedule readers for strict GPs. */ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	/* 2) batch handling */ | ||||
|  |  | |||
|  | @ -486,13 +486,16 @@ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long flags) | |||
| 	struct rcu_node *rnp; | ||||
| 	union rcu_special special; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); | ||||
| 	if (rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending == DEFER_QS_PENDING) | ||||
| 		rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = DEFER_QS_IDLE; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	/*
 | ||||
| 	 * If RCU core is waiting for this CPU to exit its critical section, | ||||
| 	 * report the fact that it has exited.  Because irqs are disabled, | ||||
| 	 * t->rcu_read_unlock_special cannot change. | ||||
| 	 */ | ||||
| 	special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special; | ||||
| 	rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); | ||||
| 	if (!special.s && !rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp) { | ||||
| 		local_irq_restore(flags); | ||||
| 		return; | ||||
|  | @ -629,7 +632,23 @@ static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler(struct irq_work *iwp) | |||
| 
 | ||||
| 	rdp = container_of(iwp, struct rcu_data, defer_qs_iw); | ||||
| 	local_irq_save(flags); | ||||
| 	rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = false; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	/*
 | ||||
| 	 * If the IRQ work handler happens to run in the middle of RCU read-side | ||||
| 	 * critical section, it could be ineffective in getting the scheduler's | ||||
| 	 * attention to report a deferred quiescent state (the whole point of the | ||||
| 	 * IRQ work). For this reason, requeue the IRQ work. | ||||
| 	 * | ||||
| 	 * Basically, we want to avoid following situation: | ||||
| 	 * 1. rcu_read_unlock() queues IRQ work (state -> DEFER_QS_PENDING) | ||||
| 	 * 2. CPU enters new rcu_read_lock() | ||||
| 	 * 3. IRQ work runs but cannot report QS due to rcu_preempt_depth() > 0 | ||||
| 	 * 4. rcu_read_unlock() does not re-queue work (state still PENDING) | ||||
| 	 * 5. Deferred QS reporting does not happen. | ||||
| 	 */ | ||||
| 	if (rcu_preempt_depth() > 0) | ||||
| 		WRITE_ONCE(rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending, DEFER_QS_IDLE); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	local_irq_restore(flags); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -676,17 +695,13 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t) | |||
| 			set_tsk_need_resched(current); | ||||
| 			set_preempt_need_resched(); | ||||
| 			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) && irqs_were_disabled && | ||||
| 			    expboost && !rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending && cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) { | ||||
| 			    expboost && rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending != DEFER_QS_PENDING && | ||||
| 			    cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) { | ||||
| 				// Get scheduler to re-evaluate and call hooks.
 | ||||
| 				// If !IRQ_WORK, FQS scan will eventually IPI.
 | ||||
| 				if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) && | ||||
| 				    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) | ||||
| 					rdp->defer_qs_iw = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD( | ||||
| 								rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler); | ||||
| 				else | ||||
| 					init_irq_work(&rdp->defer_qs_iw, | ||||
| 						      rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler); | ||||
| 				rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = true; | ||||
| 				rdp->defer_qs_iw = | ||||
| 					IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler); | ||||
| 				rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = DEFER_QS_PENDING; | ||||
| 				irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->defer_qs_iw, rdp->cpu); | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 		} | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Joel Fernandes
						Joel Fernandes