mirrors/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2025-11-04 10:40:15 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

docs: Fix the reference labels in Locking.rst

Browse source 
Two jump tags were misspelled, leading to non-working cross-reference
links.

Reported-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Corbet 2018-07-26 16:17:55 -06:00
parent 1fee4f7752
commit c8cce10a62
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
repo.diff.show_diff_stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
View file

@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ perfect world).
Note that you can also use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()` or Note that you can also use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()` or
:c:func:`spin_lock_irqsave()` here, which stop hardware interrupts :c:func:`spin_lock_irqsave()` here, which stop hardware interrupts
as well: see `Hard IRQ Context <#hardirq-context>`__. as well: see `Hard IRQ Context <#hard-irq-context>`__.
This works perfectly for UP as well: the spin lock vanishes, and this This works perfectly for UP as well: the spin lock vanishes, and this
macro simply becomes :c:func:`local_bh_disable()` macro simply becomes :c:func:`local_bh_disable()`
@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ The Same Softirq
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The same softirq can run on the other CPUs: you can use a per-CPU array The same softirq can run on the other CPUs: you can use a per-CPU array
(see `Per-CPU Data <#per-cpu>`__) for better performance. If you're (see `Per-CPU Data <#per-cpu-data>`__) for better performance. If you're
going so far as to use a softirq, you probably care about scalable going so far as to use a softirq, you probably care about scalable
performance enough to justify the extra complexity. performance enough to justify the extra complexity.