mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-11-03 18:20:25 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	sched/fair: Ensure that the CFS parent is added after unthrottling
Ensure that a CFS parent will be in the list whenever one of its children is also
in the list.
A warning on rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list has been
reported while running LTP test cfs_bandwidth01.
Odin Ugedal found the root cause:
	$ tree /sys/fs/cgroup/ltp/ -d --charset=ascii
	/sys/fs/cgroup/ltp/
	|-- drain
	`-- test-6851
	    `-- level2
		|-- level3a
		|   |-- worker1
		|   `-- worker2
		`-- level3b
		    `-- worker3
Timeline (ish):
- worker3 gets throttled
- level3b is decayed, since it has no more load
- level2 get throttled
- worker3 get unthrottled
- level2 get unthrottled
  - worker3 is added to list
  - level3b is not added to list, since nr_running==0 and is decayed
 [ Vincent Guittot: Rebased and updated to fix for the reported warning. ]
Fixes: a7b359fc6a ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle")
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210621174330.11258-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									a96bfed64c
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						fdaba61ef8
					
				
					 1 changed files with 28 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -3298,6 +3298,31 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
 | 
			
		|||
 | 
			
		||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 | 
			
		||||
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 | 
			
		||||
/*
 | 
			
		||||
 * Because list_add_leaf_cfs_rq always places a child cfs_rq on the list
 | 
			
		||||
 * immediately before a parent cfs_rq, and cfs_rqs are removed from the list
 | 
			
		||||
 * bottom-up, we only have to test whether the cfs_rq before us on the list
 | 
			
		||||
 * is our child.
 | 
			
		||||
 * If cfs_rq is not on the list, test whether a child needs its to be added to
 | 
			
		||||
 * connect a branch to the tree  * (see list_add_leaf_cfs_rq() for details).
 | 
			
		||||
 */
 | 
			
		||||
static inline bool child_cfs_rq_on_list(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 | 
			
		||||
{
 | 
			
		||||
	struct cfs_rq *prev_cfs_rq;
 | 
			
		||||
	struct list_head *prev;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	if (cfs_rq->on_list) {
 | 
			
		||||
		prev = cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.prev;
 | 
			
		||||
	} else {
 | 
			
		||||
		struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		prev = rq->tmp_alone_branch;
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	prev_cfs_rq = container_of(prev, struct cfs_rq, leaf_cfs_rq_list);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	return (prev_cfs_rq->tg->parent == cfs_rq->tg);
 | 
			
		||||
}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 | 
			
		||||
{
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -3313,6 +3338,9 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 | 
			
		|||
	if (cfs_rq->avg.runnable_sum)
 | 
			
		||||
		return false;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	if (child_cfs_rq_on_list(cfs_rq))
 | 
			
		||||
		return false;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	return true;
 | 
			
		||||
}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue