mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-11-04 02:30:34 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	The prev->next pointer can be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN: write (marked) to 0xffff9d3370dbbe40 of 8 bytes by task 3294 on cpu 107: osq_lock+0x25f/0x350 osq_wait_next at kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:79 (inlined by) osq_lock at kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:185 rwsem_optimistic_spin <snip> read to 0xffff9d3370dbbe40 of 8 bytes by task 3398 on cpu 100: osq_lock+0x196/0x350 osq_lock at kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:157 rwsem_optimistic_spin <snip> Since the write only stores NULL to prev->next and the read tests if prev->next equals to this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node). Even if the value is shattered, the code is still working correctly. Thus, mark it as an intentional data race using the data_race() macro. Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			232 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			5.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			232 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			5.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 | 
						|
#include <linux/percpu.h>
 | 
						|
#include <linux/sched.h>
 | 
						|
#include <linux/osq_lock.h>
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
/*
 | 
						|
 * An MCS like lock especially tailored for optimistic spinning for sleeping
 | 
						|
 * lock implementations (mutex, rwsem, etc).
 | 
						|
 *
 | 
						|
 * Using a single mcs node per CPU is safe because sleeping locks should not be
 | 
						|
 * called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while
 | 
						|
 * spinning.
 | 
						|
 */
 | 
						|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_node, osq_node);
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
/*
 | 
						|
 * We use the value 0 to represent "no CPU", thus the encoded value
 | 
						|
 * will be the CPU number incremented by 1.
 | 
						|
 */
 | 
						|
static inline int encode_cpu(int cpu_nr)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	return cpu_nr + 1;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
static inline int node_cpu(struct optimistic_spin_node *node)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	return node->cpu - 1;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
static inline struct optimistic_spin_node *decode_cpu(int encoded_cpu_val)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	int cpu_nr = encoded_cpu_val - 1;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	return per_cpu_ptr(&osq_node, cpu_nr);
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
/*
 | 
						|
 * Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes.
 | 
						|
 * Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead.
 | 
						|
 */
 | 
						|
static inline struct optimistic_spin_node *
 | 
						|
osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
 | 
						|
	      struct optimistic_spin_node *node,
 | 
						|
	      struct optimistic_spin_node *prev)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_node *next = NULL;
 | 
						|
	int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
 | 
						|
	int old;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * If there is a prev node in queue, then the 'old' value will be
 | 
						|
	 * the prev node's CPU #, else it's set to OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL since if
 | 
						|
	 * we're currently last in queue, then the queue will then become empty.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
	old = prev ? prev->cpu : OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	for (;;) {
 | 
						|
		if (atomic_read(&lock->tail) == curr &&
 | 
						|
		    atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) {
 | 
						|
			/*
 | 
						|
			 * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
 | 
						|
			 * will now observe @lock and will complete its
 | 
						|
			 * unlock()/unqueue().
 | 
						|
			 */
 | 
						|
			break;
 | 
						|
		}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		/*
 | 
						|
		 * We must xchg() the @node->next value, because if we were to
 | 
						|
		 * leave it in, a concurrent unlock()/unqueue() from
 | 
						|
		 * @node->next might complete Step-A and think its @prev is
 | 
						|
		 * still valid.
 | 
						|
		 *
 | 
						|
		 * If the concurrent unlock()/unqueue() wins the race, we'll
 | 
						|
		 * wait for either @lock to point to us, through its Step-B, or
 | 
						|
		 * wait for a new @node->next from its Step-C.
 | 
						|
		 */
 | 
						|
		if (node->next) {
 | 
						|
			next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
 | 
						|
			if (next)
 | 
						|
				break;
 | 
						|
		}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		cpu_relax();
 | 
						|
	}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	return next;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next;
 | 
						|
	int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
 | 
						|
	int old;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	node->locked = 0;
 | 
						|
	node->next = NULL;
 | 
						|
	node->cpu = curr;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * We need both ACQUIRE (pairs with corresponding RELEASE in
 | 
						|
	 * unlock() uncontended, or fastpath) and RELEASE (to publish
 | 
						|
	 * the node fields we just initialised) semantics when updating
 | 
						|
	 * the lock tail.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
	old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr);
 | 
						|
	if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL)
 | 
						|
		return true;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	prev = decode_cpu(old);
 | 
						|
	node->prev = prev;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * osq_lock()			unqueue
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * node->prev = prev		osq_wait_next()
 | 
						|
	 * WMB				MB
 | 
						|
	 * prev->next = node		next->prev = prev // unqueue-C
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * Here 'node->prev' and 'next->prev' are the same variable and we need
 | 
						|
	 * to ensure these stores happen in-order to avoid corrupting the list.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
	smp_wmb();
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that
 | 
						|
	 * moment unlock can proceed and wipe the node element from stack.
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * However, since our nodes are static per-cpu storage, we're
 | 
						|
	 * guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply
 | 
						|
	 * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Wait to acquire the lock or cancelation. Note that need_resched()
 | 
						|
	 * will come with an IPI, which will wake smp_cond_load_relaxed() if it
 | 
						|
	 * is implemented with a monitor-wait. vcpu_is_preempted() relies on
 | 
						|
	 * polling, be careful.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
	if (smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->locked, VAL || need_resched() ||
 | 
						|
				  vcpu_is_preempted(node_cpu(node->prev))))
 | 
						|
		return true;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/* unqueue */
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Step - A  -- stabilize @prev
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * Undo our @prev->next assignment; this will make @prev's
 | 
						|
	 * unlock()/unqueue() wait for a next pointer since @lock points to us
 | 
						|
	 * (or later).
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	for (;;) {
 | 
						|
		/*
 | 
						|
		 * cpu_relax() below implies a compiler barrier which would
 | 
						|
		 * prevent this comparison being optimized away.
 | 
						|
		 */
 | 
						|
		if (data_race(prev->next) == node &&
 | 
						|
		    cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node)
 | 
						|
			break;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		/*
 | 
						|
		 * We can only fail the cmpxchg() racing against an unlock(),
 | 
						|
		 * in which case we should observe @node->locked becomming
 | 
						|
		 * true.
 | 
						|
		 */
 | 
						|
		if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
 | 
						|
			return true;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		cpu_relax();
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		/*
 | 
						|
		 * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
 | 
						|
		 * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer.
 | 
						|
		 */
 | 
						|
		prev = READ_ONCE(node->prev);
 | 
						|
	}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Step - B -- stabilize @next
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * Similar to unlock(), wait for @node->next or move @lock from @node
 | 
						|
	 * back to @prev.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev);
 | 
						|
	if (!next)
 | 
						|
		return false;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Step - C -- unlink
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * @prev is stable because its still waiting for a new @prev->next
 | 
						|
	 * pointer, @next is stable because our @node->next pointer is NULL and
 | 
						|
	 * it will wait in Step-A.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	WRITE_ONCE(next->prev, prev);
 | 
						|
	WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next);
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	return false;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_node *node, *next;
 | 
						|
	int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Fast path for the uncontended case.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
	if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg_release(&lock->tail, curr,
 | 
						|
					  OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr))
 | 
						|
		return;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Second most likely case.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
	node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
 | 
						|
	next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
 | 
						|
	if (next) {
 | 
						|
		WRITE_ONCE(next->locked, 1);
 | 
						|
		return;
 | 
						|
	}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, NULL);
 | 
						|
	if (next)
 | 
						|
		WRITE_ONCE(next->locked, 1);
 | 
						|
}
 |