mirror of
				https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-10-31 08:38:45 +02:00 
			
		
		
		
	 457c899653
			
		
	
	
		457c899653
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			195 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			5.2 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			195 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			5.2 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 | |
| #include <linux/atomic.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/rwsem.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/percpu.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/sched.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/errno.h>
 | |
| 
 | |
| #include "rwsem.h"
 | |
| 
 | |
| int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem,
 | |
| 			const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwsem_key)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	sem->read_count = alloc_percpu(int);
 | |
| 	if (unlikely(!sem->read_count))
 | |
| 		return -ENOMEM;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */
 | |
| 	rcu_sync_init(&sem->rss, RCU_SCHED_SYNC);
 | |
| 	__init_rwsem(&sem->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key);
 | |
| 	rcuwait_init(&sem->writer);
 | |
| 	sem->readers_block = 0;
 | |
| 	return 0;
 | |
| }
 | |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_init_rwsem);
 | |
| 
 | |
| void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * XXX: temporary kludge. The error path in alloc_super()
 | |
| 	 * assumes that percpu_free_rwsem() is safe after kzalloc().
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	if (!sem->read_count)
 | |
| 		return;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	rcu_sync_dtor(&sem->rss);
 | |
| 	free_percpu(sem->read_count);
 | |
| 	sem->read_count = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
 | |
| }
 | |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_free_rwsem);
 | |
| 
 | |
| int __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, int try)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Due to having preemption disabled the decrement happens on
 | |
| 	 * the same CPU as the increment, avoiding the
 | |
| 	 * increment-on-one-CPU-and-decrement-on-another problem.
 | |
| 	 *
 | |
| 	 * If the reader misses the writer's assignment of readers_block, then
 | |
| 	 * the writer is guaranteed to see the reader's increment.
 | |
| 	 *
 | |
| 	 * Conversely, any readers that increment their sem->read_count after
 | |
| 	 * the writer looks are guaranteed to see the readers_block value,
 | |
| 	 * which in turn means that they are guaranteed to immediately
 | |
| 	 * decrement their sem->read_count, so that it doesn't matter that the
 | |
| 	 * writer missed them.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	smp_mb(); /* A matches D */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * If !readers_block the critical section starts here, matched by the
 | |
| 	 * release in percpu_up_write().
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	if (likely(!smp_load_acquire(&sem->readers_block)))
 | |
| 		return 1;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Per the above comment; we still have preemption disabled and
 | |
| 	 * will thus decrement on the same CPU as we incremented.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	__percpu_up_read(sem);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	if (try)
 | |
| 		return 0;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * We either call schedule() in the wait, or we'll fall through
 | |
| 	 * and reschedule on the preempt_enable() in percpu_down_read().
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	preempt_enable_no_resched();
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Avoid lockdep for the down/up_read() we already have them.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	__down_read(&sem->rw_sem);
 | |
| 	this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
 | |
| 	__up_read(&sem->rw_sem);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	preempt_disable();
 | |
| 	return 1;
 | |
| }
 | |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_down_read);
 | |
| 
 | |
| void __percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	smp_mb(); /* B matches C */
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * In other words, if they see our decrement (presumably to aggregate
 | |
| 	 * zero, as that is the only time it matters) they will also see our
 | |
| 	 * critical section.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	__this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/* Prod writer to recheck readers_active */
 | |
| 	rcuwait_wake_up(&sem->writer);
 | |
| }
 | |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_up_read);
 | |
| 
 | |
| #define per_cpu_sum(var)						\
 | |
| ({									\
 | |
| 	typeof(var) __sum = 0;						\
 | |
| 	int cpu;							\
 | |
| 	compiletime_assert_atomic_type(__sum);				\
 | |
| 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)					\
 | |
| 		__sum += per_cpu(var, cpu);				\
 | |
| 	__sum;								\
 | |
| })
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Return true if the modular sum of the sem->read_count per-CPU variable is
 | |
|  * zero.  If this sum is zero, then it is stable due to the fact that if any
 | |
|  * newly arriving readers increment a given counter, they will immediately
 | |
|  * decrement that same counter.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| static bool readers_active_check(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	if (per_cpu_sum(*sem->read_count) != 0)
 | |
| 		return false;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * If we observed the decrement; ensure we see the entire critical
 | |
| 	 * section.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	smp_mb(); /* C matches B */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	return true;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	/* Notify readers to take the slow path. */
 | |
| 	rcu_sync_enter(&sem->rss);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	down_write(&sem->rw_sem);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Notify new readers to block; up until now, and thus throughout the
 | |
| 	 * longish rcu_sync_enter() above, new readers could still come in.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	WRITE_ONCE(sem->readers_block, 1);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	smp_mb(); /* D matches A */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * If they don't see our writer of readers_block, then we are
 | |
| 	 * guaranteed to see their sem->read_count increment, and therefore
 | |
| 	 * will wait for them.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/* Wait for all now active readers to complete. */
 | |
| 	rcuwait_wait_event(&sem->writer, readers_active_check(sem));
 | |
| }
 | |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_write);
 | |
| 
 | |
| void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Signal the writer is done, no fast path yet.
 | |
| 	 *
 | |
| 	 * One reason that we cannot just immediately flip to readers_fast is
 | |
| 	 * that new readers might fail to see the results of this writer's
 | |
| 	 * critical section.
 | |
| 	 *
 | |
| 	 * Therefore we force it through the slow path which guarantees an
 | |
| 	 * acquire and thereby guarantees the critical section's consistency.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	smp_store_release(&sem->readers_block, 0);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Release the write lock, this will allow readers back in the game.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	up_write(&sem->rw_sem);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Once this completes (at least one RCU-sched grace period hence) the
 | |
| 	 * reader fast path will be available again. Safe to use outside the
 | |
| 	 * exclusive write lock because its counting.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	rcu_sync_exit(&sem->rss);
 | |
| }
 | |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_up_write);
 |