This involved some refactoring of the 2d context code, which lead to some more test passed there.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0f8c1b460100f226df954a3924598434f3dda9b2
This is a direct extract from my abandoned PR for a lint (#7546), along with some rather clumsy modifications (only on `components/script/dom/mod.rs` and `components/style/lib.rs`), because I had to sort some of the files again to make peace with tidy, which hasn't been educated about sorting yet!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a7208869f2903e36f9b2f540b55b50283d7df466
Prior to #7416 and #7401, many of these `impl` sections were not
identical
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2f227a034a12158e2592b645c061d92c87c8eba6
Now that `JSRef<T>` is gone, there is no need to have helper traits.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 909429702972d53bf02dfe9a4aa93ea0cb588cf4
Since it probably won't merge until multiprocess lands, I plan to use this PR to keep improving WebGL support until it can land.
Main TODOs are integration of tests, since it seems https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/issues/1105 is going nowhere, adding missing calls and proper painting via native surfaces instead of readback.
I can't resolve conflicts right now because of time but I will do it soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a109a333f1f95d4fc677b29e3613b2615514c080
Expands on the work by @wilmoz and cleans up the existing errors. Closes#7180. Closes#7111.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e74825f9fde8e222f4ba9bb24b2c2a3864c73e5f
Also adds HeapSizeOf implementations/derive for some types. I've used "Cannot calculate Heap size" as a reason everywhere, because my imagination is rather limited. If you'd like me to change this message for specific types, please write something like this: "Trusted - Cannot calculate Heap size for Trusted" so that it would be easier for me to replace them through a script :)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a03616f379c255cc6c9b6e1d04dd7d98bd9926ce
This necessitated getting rid of the boxed trait object that was being
be passed between the script task and the image cache task.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e13ebf712de444132a6cc90f394c121d8d751c4c
To actually make the multiprocess communication work, we'll need to
reroute the task creation to the pipeline or the compositor. But this
works as a first step.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1764267379a00b96a1df89f3917299a0c6fd325c
fixes#6524. I had to make an additional change not mentioned in the ticket - adding the `#[feature]` to enable deriving custom traits but I assume that's expected at this time.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bbb39082e0f640400546d2084a450a8675820a82
I left out checking invalid values when setting the shadows attributes.
r? @nox @pcwalton
cc @yichoi
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 02303941bef5f5bbdbec750ab0dfa0b77f32345a
> Here it is.
>
> ~~There's two major things that are unfinished here:~~
> - ~~Dealing with the unroot_must_root lint. I'm not sure about the value of this lint with the new rooting API.~~ Done.
> - ~~Updating the Cargo.locks to point to the new SM and SM binding.~~ Done.
>
> I also included my fixes for the rust update, but these will disappear in a rebase. A rust update is necessary to support calling `Drop` on `Heap<T>` correctly when `Heap<T>` is inside a `Rc<T>`. Otherwise `&self` points to the wrong location.
>
> Incremental GC is disabled here. I'm not sure how to deal with the incremental barriers so that's left for later.
>
> Generational GC works. SM doesn't work without it.
>
> The biggest change here is to the rooting API. `Root` was made movable, and `Temporary` and `JSRef` was removed. Movable `Root`s means there's no need for `Temporary`, and `JSRef`s aren't needed generally since it can be assumed that being able to obtain a reference to a dom object means it's already rooted. References have their lifetime bound to the Roots that provided them. DOM objects that haven't passed through `reflect_dom_object` don't need to be rooted, and DOM objects that have passed through `reflect_dom_object` can't be obtained without being rooted through `native_from_reflector_jsmanaged` or `JS::<T>::root()`.
>
> Support for `Heap<T>` ended up messier than I expected. It's split into two commits, but only because it's a bit difficult to fold them together. Supporting `Heap<T>` properly requires that that `Heap::<T>::set()` be called on something that won't move. I removed the Copy and Clone trait from `Heap<T>` so `Cell` can't hold `Heap<T>` - only `UnsafeCell` can hold it.
>
> `CallbackObject` is a bit tricky - I moved all callbacks into `Rc<T>` in order to make sure that the pointer inside to a `*mut JSObject` doesn't move. This is necessary for supporting `Heap<T>`.
>
> `RootedCollectionSet` is very general purpose now. Anything with `JSTraceable` can be rooted by `RootedCollectionSet`/`RootedTraceable`. Right now, `RootedTraceable` is only used to hold down dom objects before they're fully attached to their reflector. I had to make a custom mechanism to dispatch the trace call - couldn't figure out how to get trait objects working for this case.
>
> This has been tested with the following zeal settings:
>
> GC after every allocation
> JS_GC_ZEAL=2,1
>
> GC after every 100 allocations (important for catching use-after-free bugs)
> JS_GC_ZEAL=2,100
>
> Verify pre barriers
> JS_GC_ZEAL=4,1
>
> Verify post barriers
> JS_GC_ZEAL=11,1
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e7808c526c348fea5e3b48af70b7f1a066652097
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
It seems @hyowon uploaded her canvas shadow patch faster than me; I've handled the color dependency a bit different, this way `gfx_traits` is not required by the script module.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c8c7bd900dde73d4fddafea8239f44440f1c863b
The first step of the implementation for shadows in canvas.
r? @nox @jdm
cc @yichoi
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f163f2bf0d32861ea20470d405bb517ed5b09e84
The fillStyle and strokeStyle attributes can be either strings(color), CanvasGradients, or CanvasPatterns.
The current implementation only considers strings(color).
r? @nox @jdm @pcwalton
cc @yichoi
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ce30807be594d62b75772eac6356f84089a18c09
r? @jdm
I couldn't add the `getContextAttributes` method since `CodegenRust`
doesn't know how to return a dictionary value, I'll take a look at it ASAP.
I think the helper functions can return directly the renderer, since they're used just for that, but I wanted to hear your opinions about this.
By the way I'm interested in adding more serious tests for WebGL, and I think the [khronos conformance suit](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/tree/master/conformance-suites/1.0.3) should be the best option.
Should I try to integrate it in wpt, or making a `tests/webgl` directory (or similar) inside the servo tree? (Maybe this question should be for @Ms2ger)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0de09b936e5e37c15b7865157a98ad78b1077659
I've done a bit of job to get this done. Right now readback is still used, but we have a `LayerId` -> `CanvasRenderer` map on the paint task, that we can use to get rid of that.
I'd want review, to see if this is a good approach (I know it's not the initial `CanvasId` -> renderer approach, but it's pretty similar, since a canvas involves a `PaintLayer`).
I had to do a bit of refactoring to avoid cyclic dependencies between canvas and gfx. I'd want you to review them too.
It's mergeable and doesn't break any tests :P
Some of my main concerns:
* Does the canvas render really need to be behind an `Arc<Mutex<T>>`?
* I can't clone a `NativeSurface` right now (that's why the `SendNativeSurface()` msg is unimplemented in the WebGL task). It should be easy to add that to rust-layers, supposing the caller is responsible to mark it as non-leaking, any reason to not do it?
cc @jdm @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ad53e95080144485e74cd9b9d48ce75e20de4e36
--HG--
rename : servo/components/gfx/color.rs => servo/components/gfx_traits/color.rs
With this patch, it is now possible to create nice animations using the canvas.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5f2a8494be44d57b74bda24f2fa6b6976f71531b
* Simpler image cache API for clients to use.
* Significantly fewer threads.
* One thread for image cache task (multiplexes commands, decoder threads and async resource requests).
* 4 threads for decoder worker tasks.
* Removed ReflowEvent hacks in script and layout tasks.
* Image elements pass a Trusted<T> to image cache, which is used to dirty nodes via script task. Previous use of Untrusted addresses was unsafe.
* Image requests such as background-image on layout / paint threads trigger repaint only rather than full reflow.
* Add reflow batching for when multiple images load quickly.
* Reduces the number of paints loading wikipedia from ~95 to ~35.
* Reasonably simple to add proper prefetch support in a follow up PR.
* Async loaded images always construct Image fragments now, instead of generic.
* Image fragments support the image not being present.
* Simpler implementation of synchronous image loading for reftests.
* Removed image holder.
* image.onload support.
* image NaturalWidth and NaturalHeight support.
* Updated WPT expectations.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ac0645c2363b5a6ea3930b0857b3a27f1b6d033f
