This removes one const_cast but also adds two new ones. I think
the new ones are reasonable - conceptually the function does not
modify the input, so the input should be const. If that input
is returned as the output then we need to strip the const because
the return value shouldn't be const (because the caller should be
free to modify it if desired).
Depends on D97622
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D97623
Both are aliases to IntrinsicISizeType::MinISize and
IntrinsicISizeType::PrefISize.
Remove MOZ_ASSERT in nsLayoutUtils::IntrinsicForAxis and
nsContainerFrame::DoInlineIntrinsicISize since IntrinsicISizeType is a
enum class nowadays, which cannot have other values.
I've compiled this patch with DEBUG_INTRINSIC_WIDTH defined in
nsLayoutUtils.cpp, and fixed aWM undefined in
nsLayoutUtils::MinSizeContributionForAxis().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D94618
nsContainerFrame.h was only using the enum nsLayoutUtils::IntrinsicISizeType,
which this patch moves to LayoutConstants.h instead.
Depends on D91505
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D91506
Changes to nsIScrollableFrame.h cause the world to rebuild which I find annoying.
This removes the inclusion into Element.h which is responsible for the
world-rebuilding and is relatively easy to eliminate. A bunch of usages of
nsIScrollableFrame get moved from .h files into .cpp files and I include the
header into .cpp files as needed.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D90735
This is a straightforward conversion except that
`NS_SUBTREE_DIRTY(this)` can be written terser as `IsSubtreeDirty()`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D82811
Instead move the check to the focus manager, more similar to how
focus-visible works.
Now nsGlobalWindowInner::ShouldShowFocusRing means "Should we show focus
ring for anything in this window", that is: Have we keyboard-navigated
in this window, or do we have a pref that says that we should always
show focus rings.
Fix some callers appropriately (some of them that were not properly
accounting for the element being focused in the first place...).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D75504
Instead move the check to the focus manager, more similar to how
focus-visible works.
Now nsGlobalWindowInner::ShouldShowFocusRing means "Should we show focus
ring for anything in this window", that is: Have we keyboard-navigated
in this window, or do we have a pref that says that we should always
show focus rings.
Fix some callers appropriately (some of them that were not properly
accounting for the element being focused in the first place...).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D75504
Now that we have outlines for them, unthemed select / buttons show two
different focus indicators, which is undesired.
Furthermore, the ones in comboboxes are basically unremovable /
unstylable, so authors end up having to use massive hacks to do it, see
bug 1580935.
This fixes it elegantly (IMO) by just rendering them when themed (which
is what these were for anyway, to match the windows theme).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D75283
Turns out we did have a hook for this already! But it is used to draw or
not inner button styles, so not quite equivalent.
I had to expand the amount of things it applies to because buttons and
such do paint focus indicators in all widgets. This patch could cause
some undesired outlines in some widgets. I hope not (I tried to audit to
the best of my knowledge), but in that case they'd be just more values
to add to the list.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D74733
Turns out we did have a hook for this already! But it is used to draw or
not inner button styles, so not quite equivalent.
I had to expand the amount of things it applies to because buttons and
such do paint focus indicators in all widgets. This patch could cause
some undesired outlines in some widgets. I hope not (I tried to audit to
the best of my knowledge), but in that case they'd be just more values
to add to the list.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D74733
This is the "core" change of the patch series, which causes most
existing layout codepaths to correctly factor in the visual to
layout transform (or its inverse), as long as the callers correctly
propagate it in the correct ViewportType.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D68920
This is the "core" change of the patch series, which causes most
existing layout codepaths to correctly factor in the visual to
layout transform (or its inverse), as long as the callers correctly
propagate it in the correct ViewportType.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D68920
This should be less confusing. This is not supported outside of chrome:// or
user-agent stylesheets so we can name this however we want.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D65605
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
There were some callers in nsRangeFrame that were already not-null-checking.
All platforms have a native theme and should we add new ones they could use
nsBasicNativeTheme.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D65169
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This removes the need for explicit #ifdef NS_BUILD_REFCNT_LOGGING without
introducing user-defined destructors when it is not defined.
Also, some uses of virtual for declaring destructors are replaced by the
appropriate override declaration through these changes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D62604
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This removes the need for explicit #ifdef NS_BUILD_REFCNT_LOGGING without
introducing user-defined destructors when it is not defined.
Also, some uses of virtual for declaring destructors are replaced by the
appropriate override declaration through these changes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D62604
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The inclusions were removed with the following very crude script and the
resulting breakage was fixed up by hand. The manual fixups did either
revert the changes done by the script, replace a generic header with a more
specific one or replace a header with a forward declaration.
find . -name "*.idl" | grep -v web-platform | grep -v third_party | while read path; do
interfaces=$(grep "^\(class\|interface\).*:.*" "$path" | cut -d' ' -f2)
if [ -n "$interfaces" ]; then
if [[ "$interfaces" == *$'\n'* ]]; then
regexp="\("
for i in $interfaces; do regexp="$regexp$i\|"; done
regexp="${regexp%%\\\|}\)"
else
regexp="$interfaces"
fi
interface=$(basename "$path")
rg -l "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" . | while read path2; do
hits=$(grep -v "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" "$path2" | grep -c "$regexp" )
if [ $hits -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Removing ${interface} from ${path2}"
grep -v "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" "$path2" > "$path2".tmp
mv -f "$path2".tmp "$path2"
fi
done
fi
done
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D55443
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Update the comments, name, and fields to show it is agnostic of isize/bsize.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D51739
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Per the css-contain specification, size contained elements must be sized as if
they were empty. Up until now, we've been handling that by just using "0" as
the intrinsic size of some components, but that doesn't actually match the size
of a "true" empty select, which has some nonzero width from:
(a) the default inline-axis padding on the display frame (added in a rule for
the ::-moz-display-comboboxcontrol-frame pseudo, in forms.css).
(b) the width (inline-size) of the display frame's "placeholder" space
character, which has a small intrinsic width (but which really only exists
for *block-axis* sizing and alignment, when no option is selected from
the dropdown).
This patch addresses issue (a) by explicitly adding the display frame's
inline-axis padding to size-contained elements, and it addresses issue (b) by
changing to use a zero-width space character in empty select elements.
So: as of this patch, size-contained select elements are getting a little wider
(to address (a)), and empty select elements are also getting a little skinnier
(to address (b)), and they'll end up being the same width.
(I chose U+FEFF "zero-width non-breaking-space" since we were previously using
a non-breaking space character. I'm not sure if the non-breaking aspect matters,
but I figured I'd preserve that to be on the safe side.)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D48791
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Per the css-contain specification, size contained elements must be sized as if
they were empty. Up until now, we've been handling that by just using "0" as
the intrinsic size of some components, but that doesn't actually match the size
of a "true" empty select, which has some nonzero width from:
(a) the default inline-axis padding on the display frame (added in a rule for
the ::-moz-display-comboboxcontrol-frame pseudo, in forms.css).
(b) the width (inline-size) of the display frame's "placeholder" space
character, which has a small intrinsic width (but which really only exists
for *block-axis* sizing and alignment, when no option is selected from
the dropdown).
This patch addresses issue (a) by explicitly adding the display frame's
inline-axis padding to size-contained elements, and it addresses issue (b) by
changing to use a zero-width space character in empty select elements.
So: as of this patch, size-contained select elements are getting a little wider
(to address (a)), and empty select elements are also getting a little skinnier
(to address (b)), and they'll end up being the same width.
(I chose U+FEFF "zero-width non-breaking-space" since we were previously using
a non-breaking space character. I'm not sure if the non-breaking aspect matters,
but I figured I'd preserve that to be on the safe side.)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D48791
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Per the css-contain specification, size contained element must be sized as if
they were empty. The code added to handle size containment shortciruits the
(inline) size calculations, and returns 0. However, an empty <select> element
is rendered as if it contained a and some padding gets added to it by
the UA stylesheet (forms.css). This causes reftest that check that
size-contained <select> elements and empty ones look the same.
This commit fixes this by also shortcircuiting the (inline) size calculations
and returning 0 for empty <select> elements.
Replacing the by a zero width space would not have been enough, since
padding would still be added. It would have been possible to add it in the
inline size calculations of size-contained <select> elements as well, but this
padding serves not purpose when the element is empty, so removing it from there
has no downside, and shortcircuitig both cases is simpler (and marginally
faster) than adding the padding in both cases.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D45144
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This fixes it and seems to be an acceptable fix... Should I make it conditional
on box-sizing: border-box for completeness? The display frame has border-box
box-sizing, and not having it would be a bug, I'd think...
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41939
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This fixes it and seems to be an acceptable fix... Should I make it conditional
on box-sizing: border-box for completeness? The display frame has border-box
box-sizing, and not having it would be a bug, I'd think...
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41939
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It seems better to convert this before adding a new flag (in bug
1547759) and risking replacing the wrong 0 with a flag.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40562
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is a potential fix that I thought it was worth doing rather than
implementing Blink's platform-dependent silliness. This ensures that the display
frame always has enough space to display itself.
Note that it may still get clipped, if there's no room for both the display
frame and the button.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37922
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
