There's a few subtle behavior changes here, which I'll try to break down in the
commit message.
The biggest one is the EditableDescendantCount stuff going away. This
was added in bug 1181130, to prevent clicking on the non-editable div from
selecting the editable div inside. This is problematic for multiple reasons:
* First, I don't think non-editable regions of an editable element should
be user-select: all.
* Second, it just doesn't work in Shadow DOM (the editable descendant count is
not kept up-to-date when not in the uncomposed doc), so nested
contenteditables behave differently inside vs. outside a Shadow Tree.
* Third, I think it's user hostile to just entirely disable selection if you
have a contenteditable descendant as a child of a user-select: all thing.
WebKit behaves like this patch in the following test-case (though not Blink):
https://crisal.io/tmp/user-select-all-contenteditable-descendant.html
Edge doesn't seem to support user-select: all at all (no pun intended).
But we don't allow to select anything at all which looks wrong.
* Fourth, it's not tested at all (which explains how we broke it in Shadow DOM
and not even notice...).
In any case I've verified that this doesn't regress the editor from that bug. If
this regresses anything we can fix it as outlined in the first bullet point
above, which should also make us more compatible with other UAs in that
test-case.
The other change is `all` not overriding everything else. So, something like:
<div style="-webkit-user-select: all">All <div style="-webkit-user-select: none">None</div></div>
Totally ignores the -webkit-user-select: none declaration in Firefox before this
change. This doesn't match any other UA nor the spec, and this patch aligns us
with WebKit / Blink.
This in turn makes us not need -moz-text anymore, whose only purpose was to
avoid this.
This also fixes a variety of bugs uncovered by the previous changes, like the
SetIgnoreUserModify(false) call in editor being completely useless, since
presShell->SetCaretEnabled ended in nsCaret::SetVisible, which overrode it.
This in turn uncovered even more bugs, from bugs in the caret painting code,
like not checking -moz-user-modify on the right frame if you're the last frame
of a line, to even funnier bits where before this patch you show the caret but
can't write at all...
In any case, the new setup I came up with is that when you're editing (the
selection is focused on an editable node) moving the caret forces it to end up
in an editable node, thus jumping over non-editable ones.
This has the nice effect of not completely disabling selection of
-moz-user-select: all elements that have editable descendants (which was a very
ad-hoc hack for bug 1181130, and somewhat broken per the above), and also
not needing the -moz-user-select: all for non-editable bits in contenteditable.css
at all.
This also fixes issues with br-skipping like not being able to insert content in
the following test-case:
<div contenteditable="true"><span contenteditable="false">xyz </span><br>editable</div>
If you start moving to the left from the second line, for example.
I think this yields way better behavior in all the relevant test-cases from bug
1181130 / bug 1109968 / bug 1132768, shouldn't cause any regression, and the
complexity is significantly reduced in some places.
There's still some other broken bits that this patch doesn't fix, but I'll file
follow-ups for those.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12687
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It's only used in contenteditable.css, and same usage in comm-central. That
sheet is loaded as a ua sheet so let's restrict it to that. No relevant
external usage either. This value was introduced in bug 1181130.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11584
In this patch, remove main codes of old animation inspector such the
inspector/animation-old directory. Additionally, remove the codes that had been
referring the old codes.
Also, remove a CSS variable which no longer reffered in inspector from
devtools/client/themes/breadcrumbs.css, because this caused a test failure occur
from browser/base/content/test/static/browser_parsable_css.js. In this patch,
remove animationinspector.css as well. The reason why the error was not occurred
so far is that it had been interpreted that animationinspector.css refer to the
variable.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5498
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4a63e28f6087b9cf42cf8f02b84ed62cfe905809
Automatic changes by ESLint, except for manual corrections for .xml files.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D4439
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
DocShells are associated with outer DOM Windows, rather than Documents, so
having the getter on the document is a bit odd to begin with. But it's also
considerably less convenient, since most of the times when we want a docShell
from JS, we're dealing most directly with a window, and have to detour through
the document to get it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LUj1H9nG3QL
--HG--
extra : source : fcfb99baa0f0fb60a7c420a712c6ae7c72576871
extra : histedit_source : 5be9b7b29a52a4b8376ee0bdfc5c08b12e3c775a
DocShells are associated with outer DOM Windows, rather than Documents, so
having the getter on the document is a bit odd to begin with. But it's also
considerably less convenient, since most of the times when we want a docShell
from JS, we're dealing most directly with a window, and have to detour through
the document to get it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LUj1H9nG3QL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a13c59d1a5ed000187c7fd8e7339408ad6e2dee6
This allows to parse
.application--empty {
--test1: red;
--test2: red;
color: var(--test3);
}
and extract --test1, --test2, --test3, but not --empty.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GNQaZq5k5JU
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 1945bc7b3472c6eb5c6a55bd9c39173ad0c3541d
Enlarge controls by around 1.3x, which is the size of the original touch controls.
MozReview-Commit-ID: kpgFFIW2hh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 66636a0cb15a17ef15c2a2307a2f9100c1852480
extra : source : ae615321dc9b3e6276d8e79285d0e9d65b6d6bc2
The noControls binding is bound to <video> without controls on mobile
(see geckoview/content.css), and is only visible when the video is
blocked because of background autoplay.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KZqlQedCjd5
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c5f619b0849ee56f957e9017ab2627d592a3285e
