BindContext was going to have way more information at first, but then I realized
that most of the things I wanted to know were basically a flag away using the
parent node.
Still I think it's worth it, now experimenting with BindToTree will only mean
adding a field to a struct that's included from a couple cpp files, instead of a
massive pain.
I also think this is clearer, and doing this highlights quite a few
inconsistencies in our code which I've left untouched, but commented with
FIXMEs.
Steps are:
$ for file in $(rg 'nsresult BindToTree\(' | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#nsresult BindToTree(Document\* aDocument, nsIContent\* aParent,#nsresult BindToTree(BindContext\&, nsINode\& aParent)#g' $file; done
$ for file in $(rg 'nsresult BindToTree\(' | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's# nsIContent\* aBindingParent) override#override#g' $file; done
$ for file in $(rg '::BindToTree\(' | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#::BindToTree(Document\* aDocument, nsIContent\* aParent,#::BindToTree(BindContext\& aContext, nsINode\& aParent)#g' $file; done
$ for file in $(rg '::BindToTree\(' | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#nsIContent\* aBindingParent)##g' $file; done
$ for file in $(rg '::BindToTree\(' | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#::BindToTree(aDocument, aParent, aBindingParent)#::BindToTree(aContext, aParent)#g' $file; done
$ ./mach clang-format
Then manual fixups.
Depends on D32948
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32949
PresShell::EventHandler::HandleEventWithCurrentEventInfo is the only possible
place will do such handling; other places pass either a nullptr or a
non-MouseDown/Up event.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32431
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
$ for file in $(rg UnbindFromTree | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#UnbindFromTree(bool aDeep = true,#UnbindFromTree(#g' $file; done
$ for file in $(rg UnbindFromTree | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#UnbindFromTree(bool aDeep,#UnbindFromTree(#g' $file; done
$ for file in $(rg UnbindFromTree | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#UnbindFromTree(aDeep,#UnbindFromTree(#g' $file; done
$ ./mach clang-format
And fix the two callers and little use of the aDeep argument (see the "Manual
changes" patch attached to bug).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32898
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Summary:
Currently, `IMEStateManager::SetIMEState` sets hint to the following logic.
- If there is no submit button into form element, set `next`
- If there is submit button, set `search` or `go`
- If there isn't into form element, no hint.
But Chrome sets `next` hint when next focusable element is input that is text
control. So even if there is submit button into form element, we should set
`next` to hint when next focusable element is input that is text/number
control and is in form.
Also, If current focused element isn't in `<form>`, I don't still set hint.
`nsFocusManager::DetermineElementToMoveFocus` may set focus to cross-process
document. So `next` is set when in form and it isn't last element in form.
Reviewers: masayuki
Reviewed By: masayuki
Subscribers: JanH
Bug #: 1474902
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12885
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f9d297416c046d9b718d9ff925006c162d67f286
extra : histedit_source : d8d946deb81f1f961d002e32720eb9a40a91bf64
Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
Various places in dom/ use the pattern:
already_AddRefed<NodeInfo> ni = ...;
which is supposed to be disallowed by our static analysis code, but
isn't, for whatever reason. To fix our static analysis code, we need to
eliminate instances of the above pattern.
Unfortunately, eliminating this pattern requires restructuring how Nodes
are created. Most Node subclasses take `already_AddRefed<NodeInfo>&` in
their constructors, and a few accept `already_AddRefed<NodeInfo>&&`. We
need to enforce the latter pattern consistently, which requires changing
dozens of source files.
This makes things saner for all consumers, which makes it worth doing on its
own. But it also gives me an easy nsTArray to work with, which I can use to
dispatch DOM events with array properties.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3466
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e8bcc75e84845e42c932886502f99ca3154df48d
Mostly automatic via sed. Only parts which I touched manually (apart from a
couple ones where I fixed indentation or which had mispelled arguments) are the
callers. I may have removed a couple redundant `virtual` keywords as well when
I started to do it manually, I can revert those if wanted.
Most of them are just removing the argument, but in Element.cpp I also added an
assertion for GetBindingParent when binding the ShadowRoot's kids (the binding
parent is set from the ShadowRoot constructor, and I don't think we bind a
shadow tree during unlink or what not which could cause a behavior difference).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2574
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2oIgatty2HU
For number controls, nsContentUtils::IsFocusedContent doesn't really do the
right thing, because the thing it thinks is focused is the anonymous text
element inside the number control. As a result, we weren't properly updating
the state of the currently-focused number control when hitting enter in it to
submit the form.
The HTMLFormElement change is enough on its own to fix the bug. The constraint
validation change is a just-in-case.
I haven't figured out a sane way to write a reftest for this, unfortunately:
the enter key press needs to look like a real user event to trigger the
submission behavior.