Gijs for front-end bits, layout for the new CSS properties and the
removal of nsDeckFrame / nsStackLayout, Jamie and Morgan for the a11y
changes.
As discussed in the bug, the main tricky part here is handling a11y
correctly. For <deck>, that's trivial (just use `visibility: hidden` to
hide the panels visually, while removing the unselected panels from the
a11y tree).
For <tabpanels> however we need to do something special. We do want to
hide stuff visually, but we want to preserve the contents in the a11y
tree.
For that, the easiest fix is introducing a new privileged CSS property
(-moz-subtree-hidden-only-visually), which takes care of not painting
the frame, but marks stuff offscreen in the accessibility tree. This is
not intended to be a property used widely.
Other than that, the changes are relatively straight-forward, though
some of the accessible/mac changes I could get a sanity-check on.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157875
Gijs for front-end bits, layout for the new CSS properties and the
removal of nsDeckFrame / nsStackLayout, Jamie and Morgan for the a11y
changes.
As discussed in the bug, the main tricky part here is handling a11y
correctly. For <deck>, that's trivial (just use `visibility: hidden` to
hide the panels visually, while removing the unselected panels from the
a11y tree).
For <tabpanels> however we need to do something special. We do want to
hide stuff visually, but we want to preserve the contents in the a11y
tree.
For that, the easiest fix is introducing a new privileged CSS property
(-moz-subtree-hidden-only-visually), which takes care of not painting
the frame, but marks stuff offscreen in the accessibility tree. This is
not intended to be a property used widely.
Other than that, the changes are relatively straight-forward, though
some of the accessible/mac changes I could get a sanity-check on.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157875
This doesn't change behavior just yet, but seems worth doing separately.
With this patch, we can render content overlaid on top of an image
frame, by attaching a shadow root to it. The idea is to use this for
text recognition (OCR) of text inside images.
I chose to implement this using the DynamicLeaf stuff that I removed in
bug 1746310 (because nsMenuPopupFrame was its only user).
That seems simpler than either a new frame class, or more special cases
in the frame constructor, etc. But let me know if you disagree.
There are further changes that we want to do. For example, trying to
select the overlaid text with the mouse right now will start dragging
the image. For that, we might need to tweak our selection / mouse
dragging code. But those seem all changes that can go on top of this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D140638
It's unused on mozilla-central, and Thunderbird can just use the canvas
frame as regular (X)HTML documents, so just use a canvas frame instead
of an nsRootBoxFrame for XUL as well.
nsRootBoxFrame was needed because of various XUL-specific things like
tooltips and so on lived there. But with the move away from XUL, that
functionality has been added to nsCanvasFrame already, behind a
principal check instead.
This also allows simplifying our background propagation setup, which was
only half-working for XUL documents (this bug is a consequence of that).
With this, most of the callers of nsCSSRendering::IsCanvasFrame can go.
They're only two of the frames that would return true for that that
actually paint backgrounds (nsCanvasFrame and nsRootBoxFrame), so the
codepaths in display list building and painting can just check
frame->IsCanvasFrame() instead.
The remaining caller to that function is
nsContainerFrame::SyncWindowProperties, and the change is also legit, in
the sense that the only thing SyncWindowProperties() really cares about
is propagating the max/min-width constraints from the root element's
style to the view/widget, and the only frame that would return true from
IsCanvasFrame and have a view is the viewport frame which is the root of
the frame tree.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D90846
Note that there's still a little plugin related code in
widget/ and gfx/ etc after this. That can be removed
once we remove plugin support from dom/ etc.
The removal from layout/ should be pretty complete though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D102140
Allow-list all Python code in tree for use with the black linter, and re-format all code in-tree accordingly.
To produce this patch I did all of the following:
1. Make changes to tools/lint/black.yml to remove include: stanza and update list of source extensions.
2. Run ./mach lint --linter black --fix
3. Make some ad-hoc manual updates to python/mozbuild/mozbuild/test/configure/test_configure.py -- it has some hard-coded line numbers that the reformat breaks.
4. Make some ad-hoc manual updates to `testing/marionette/client/setup.py`, `testing/marionette/harness/setup.py`, and `testing/firefox-ui/harness/setup.py`, which have hard-coded regexes that break after the reformat.
5. Add a set of exclusions to black.yml. These will be deleted in a follow-up bug (1672023).
# ignore-this-changeset
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D94045
Allow-list all Python code in tree for use with the black linter, and re-format all code in-tree accordingly.
To produce this patch I did all of the following:
1. Make changes to tools/lint/black.yml to remove include: stanza and update list of source extensions.
2. Run ./mach lint --linter black --fix
3. Make some ad-hoc manual updates to python/mozbuild/mozbuild/test/configure/test_configure.py -- it has some hard-coded line numbers that the reformat breaks.
4. Make some ad-hoc manual updates to `testing/marionette/client/setup.py`, `testing/marionette/harness/setup.py`, and `testing/firefox-ui/harness/setup.py`, which have hard-coded regexes that break after the reformat.
5. Add a set of exclusions to black.yml. These will be deleted in a follow-up bug (1672023).
# ignore-this-changeset
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D94045
Allow-list all Python code in tree for use with the black linter, and re-format all code in-tree accordingly.
To produce this patch I did all of the following:
1. Make changes to tools/lint/black.yml to remove include: stanza and update list of source extensions.
2. Run ./mach lint --linter black --fix
3. Make some ad-hoc manual updates to python/mozbuild/mozbuild/test/configure/test_configure.py -- it has some hard-coded line numbers that the reformat breaks.
4. Add a set of exclusions to black.yml. These will be deleted in a follow-up bug (1672023).
# ignore-this-changeset
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D94045
My previous patch somehow causes WR to crash and fall back to d2d on Windows,
see bug 1671591.
While I figure that out let's fix TB by restoring the previous behavior
for XUL.
Rename the Root frame type because it's super-confusing that IsRootFrame
is not equivalent to !GetParent().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D94105
This patch is just to get the "new file/frame class" boilerplate out of the
way. As of this patch, this frame class *is* compiled, but it doesn't do
anything and it's never instantiated. The next patch in this series will make
us actually start using it at runtime.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D83456
In print preview documents the child of the root scroll frame is a page sequence frame.
I did a basic test of pinch zooming and panning (in a debug build and in an opt build) around on a print preview document and it seemed to work fine.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D76591
LayoutFrameType::NumberControl is unused, and nsNumberControlFrame inherits now
from nsTextControlFrame. There are three places that check for
LayoutFrameType::TextInput. Two direct ones:
* ShouldApplyOverflowCLipping
* nsFontInflationData
And one indirect via IsTextInputFrame, the one mentioned in comment 2. For all
those three, it makes sense for nsNumberControlFrame to be handled in the same
way as nsTextControlFrame.
Long term we may want to get rid of the concept of frame types and just use
queryFrame or some sugar of that sort, as it's error prone. But for now this
fixes the bug.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D61088
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
