In some of these cases, files were not being closed
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 3a48e04caffa4ba25854a4190883d1985845a359
Generates `SupportedPropertyNames` on DOM structs that should implement
it. Most of them are unimplemented now (which can be implemented in
later PRs), with the exception of `HTMLCollection`. Also added a couple
relevant WPT tests.
Closes#6390Closes#2215
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d2a8c278eaa159ceacffee767523d4ad0cf83da2
`CGAbstractMethod` takes a couple boolean parameters, among others:
* `extern`: will mark the method as `unsafe` and `extern`
* `unsafe`: will wrap the method body in an `unsafe` block
Passing both as `True` should not mark it as `unsafe` twice.
Example from a generated `HTMLCollectionBinding.rs`:
Before:
```
unsafe extern fn get_length(..) -> u8 {
unsafe {
// code here
}
}
```
After
```
unsafe extern fn get_length(..) -> u8 {
// code here
}
```
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 289decb064b44937f570fdc299de9af961296dd6
…s for frame treese in script tasks.
This underreports by a significant amount, since only Document, Window and CharacterData (ie. text) nodes are fully represented. That being said, every HTML element in the tree is measured, but only counted as a Node. It's easy to improve this, it just requires adding the appropriate HeapSizeOf derives and increasing the granularity of `measure_memory_for_eventtarget`. google.com shows a dom-tree value of 0.24 MB for me at the moment.
r? @nnethercote
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 84e25befdd97cf74fb00707dbe150d59d980e977
The unsafety was fixed as part of the SpiderMonkey upgrade; this removes the
now unused annotation.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7adc336aaacfb5e544a9c8c4e0387afa457e5d72
* Adding dependencies
* Replacing `i8` with `libc::c_char` to build properly on platforms
where char is unsigned.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b386d7ae444af868907b9faff44e8432469160bd
This was the preferred pattern between the deprecation of Vec::from_elem and
the addition of the count argument to the vec![] macro.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 556c0e1509cb48b90f492bcf0f25d0ed14b015d1
Recently, I found myself reading through the Python codegen scripts that
live in 'components/script/dom/bindings/*' and noticed that there were
many tidy violations: unnecessary semicolons, weird spacing, unused
variables, lack of license headers, etc. Considering these files are now
living in our tree and mostly maintained directly by contributors of
Servo (as opposed to being from upstream), I feel these files should not
be excluded from our normal tidy process. This commit removes the
blacklist on these files and fixes all tidy violations.
I added these subdirectories to the blacklist because they appear to be
maintained upstream somewhere else:
* "components/script/dom/bindings/codegen/parser/*",
* "components/script/dom/bindings/codegen/ply/*",
Also, I added a few '# noqa' comments which tells us to ignore the
flake8 errors for that line; they are mostly for unused/undefined
variables. I chose to ignore these (instead of fixing them) to make the
work for this commit simpler for me.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2d2a340633dcc73e458a8454b78e26ba93511d37
fixes#6524. I had to make an additional change not mentioned in the ticket - adding the `#[feature]` to enable deriving custom traits but I assume that's expected at this time.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bbb39082e0f640400546d2084a450a8675820a82
I'm not sure if I like how I mostly just duplicated the code in CodegenRust.py, so that might need to be refactored.
Instead of just calling it Image, we might want to call it ConstructorImage, to make it clear that it's a constructor. Anyone have an opinion on that?
There seems to be a bug in the HTMLImageElement getter/setter as the value is 0 regardless of what I do. This seems to be unrelated to my commits, so I'll investigate that separately.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 57cc84b2935c429c92774649275625a7fd63973c
> Here it is.
>
> ~~There's two major things that are unfinished here:~~
> - ~~Dealing with the unroot_must_root lint. I'm not sure about the value of this lint with the new rooting API.~~ Done.
> - ~~Updating the Cargo.locks to point to the new SM and SM binding.~~ Done.
>
> I also included my fixes for the rust update, but these will disappear in a rebase. A rust update is necessary to support calling `Drop` on `Heap<T>` correctly when `Heap<T>` is inside a `Rc<T>`. Otherwise `&self` points to the wrong location.
>
> Incremental GC is disabled here. I'm not sure how to deal with the incremental barriers so that's left for later.
>
> Generational GC works. SM doesn't work without it.
>
> The biggest change here is to the rooting API. `Root` was made movable, and `Temporary` and `JSRef` was removed. Movable `Root`s means there's no need for `Temporary`, and `JSRef`s aren't needed generally since it can be assumed that being able to obtain a reference to a dom object means it's already rooted. References have their lifetime bound to the Roots that provided them. DOM objects that haven't passed through `reflect_dom_object` don't need to be rooted, and DOM objects that have passed through `reflect_dom_object` can't be obtained without being rooted through `native_from_reflector_jsmanaged` or `JS::<T>::root()`.
>
> Support for `Heap<T>` ended up messier than I expected. It's split into two commits, but only because it's a bit difficult to fold them together. Supporting `Heap<T>` properly requires that that `Heap::<T>::set()` be called on something that won't move. I removed the Copy and Clone trait from `Heap<T>` so `Cell` can't hold `Heap<T>` - only `UnsafeCell` can hold it.
>
> `CallbackObject` is a bit tricky - I moved all callbacks into `Rc<T>` in order to make sure that the pointer inside to a `*mut JSObject` doesn't move. This is necessary for supporting `Heap<T>`.
>
> `RootedCollectionSet` is very general purpose now. Anything with `JSTraceable` can be rooted by `RootedCollectionSet`/`RootedTraceable`. Right now, `RootedTraceable` is only used to hold down dom objects before they're fully attached to their reflector. I had to make a custom mechanism to dispatch the trace call - couldn't figure out how to get trait objects working for this case.
>
> This has been tested with the following zeal settings:
>
> GC after every allocation
> JS_GC_ZEAL=2,1
>
> GC after every 100 allocations (important for catching use-after-free bugs)
> JS_GC_ZEAL=2,100
>
> Verify pre barriers
> JS_GC_ZEAL=4,1
>
> Verify post barriers
> JS_GC_ZEAL=11,1
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e7808c526c348fea5e3b48af70b7f1a066652097
This is necessary to ensure Cargo knows when to rebuild. Normally
.gitignore would be enough to exclude these from Cargo's freshness
calculation, but https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/1729 prevents
this currently. This is the new, correct way to do these thigns, just
like the style crate does.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ff59e1b8de67f1988522d6b6e6c4adda957fad5b
The cause of the issue is that the index of the overload to be invoked was being derived from the wrong lists (that contain only a subset of the overloads) - `possibleOverloads` and `interfaceSigs` rather than the `method.signatures()` (which contains all possible overloads).
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b46ab0c60d53461d639c74d9c6b39d0c6c2d78c9
This should allow the jQuery testsuite to complete.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9edc296c46b05606c74920a42ba0effb5c953db0
r? @jdm
I couldn't add the `getContextAttributes` method since `CodegenRust`
doesn't know how to return a dictionary value, I'll take a look at it ASAP.
I think the helper functions can return directly the renderer, since they're used just for that, but I wanted to hear your opinions about this.
By the way I'm interested in adding more serious tests for WebGL, and I think the [khronos conformance suit](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/tree/master/conformance-suites/1.0.3) should be the best option.
Should I try to integrate it in wpt, or making a `tests/webgl` directory (or similar) inside the servo tree? (Maybe this question should be for @Ms2ger)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0de09b936e5e37c15b7865157a98ad78b1077659
Fixes#3257
In eventtarget.rs I'm not sure whether ARG_NAMES actually needs to be static!?
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 999325460ecc71b02160e8c79e71a694987d9acd
The proxy stringifiers called through {}.toString.call() (obj_toString) shouldn't use the stringifier.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2c177794408bfbb5f8d6042f38639a5cba5eb2e5
fixes#5724, #5737
uses https://github.com/Manishearth/rust-tenacious (can be moved in-tree if needed)
I can make it `Deny` by default too (I'll add a cargo feature to tenacious), though we might want it on
`Warn` until we get some mileage on it.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d7987e43c944eb9b156bf3244c08fce4cb570db4
