On Gecko, we get tons of console spam from 1-element traversals if we don't do this.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b51416846993f108269c0d979649c575e47a91ac
--HG--
extra : subtree_source : https%3A//hg.mozilla.org/projects/converted-servo-linear
extra : subtree_revision : 45a8d3e1054aa01c263cfe90c3cfd2d3c3c5e71f
I wanted to add an environmental variable to disable the style sharing
cache for gecko, but the current pattern involves lazy_static!, which
involves an atomic operation on lookup, which is a bit hot to do each
time we try to share styles. This makes that work happen once per
process.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 54ecfb155dba40382764ee20186a31f067a507be
--HG--
extra : subtree_source : https%3A//hg.mozilla.org/projects/converted-servo-linear
extra : subtree_revision : 35cbfe0f6490eadf25d9de020f0d2ea851badaba
This is on top of #15888. Only the second commit needs review.
We put the more recently used item last, so iterating then from left to right is
pointless.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7fa4a94bb154449702e5ae9422c3008a5195c714
--HG--
extra : subtree_source : https%3A//hg.mozilla.org/projects/converted-servo-linear
extra : subtree_revision : fbf4742c4186ad27bd4d5ccd3e2319a5b0748b55
This adds a traversal time entry to the style statistics, and switches to warn! as discussed in [1].
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1339176
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 715a16423095e1bba2c192c0aebecb8f6aaffab3
--HG--
extra : subtree_source : https%3A//hg.mozilla.org/projects/converted-servo-linear
extra : subtree_revision : 945c58dec89fcbd5f4e59729a37aacddf368b983
This way we'll be able to take different paths for the sequential and parallel
traversals in some concrete cases.
This is a preliminar patch to fix bug 1332525.
r? @bholley
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1934a338757a84a6efddcbd3ecf051cd128a8d18
Style no forced docs for the properties code and similar, but I ran out of time, and I think it's a nice improvement.
I'd appreciate a fast-ish turn-around time because this is pretty much prone to bitrot.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bd67163438317daa711b2411ce302aaf5bf4136a
See the discussion in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323372
@emilio Please review, but don't merge yet until we get the upstream changes into Rayon.
CC @SimonSapin @heycam @upsuper @Manishearth @pcwalton @nikomatsakis
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8fd8d6161426af386c0dfd3d13968a409474eb16
The primary idea of this patch is to ditch the rigid enum of Previous/Current
styles, and replace it with a series of indicators for the various types of
work that needs to be performed (expanding snapshots, rematching, recascading,
and damage processing). This loses us a little bit of sanity checking (since
the up-to-date-ness of our style is no longer baked into the type system), but
gives us a lot more flexibility that we'll need going forward (especially when
we separate matching from cascading). We also eliminate get_styling_mode in
favor of a method on the traversal.
This patch does a few other things as ridealongs:
* Temporarily eliminates the handling for transfering ownership of styles to the
frame. We'll need this again at some point, but for now it's causing too much
complexity for a half-implemented feature.
* Ditches TRestyleDamage, which is no longer necessary post-crate-merge, and is
a constant source of compilation failures from either needing to be imported
or being unnecessarily imported (which varies between gecko and servo).
* Expands Snapshots for the traversal root, which was missing before.
* Fixes up the skip_root stuff to avoid visiting the skipped root.
* Unifies parallel traversal and avoids spawning for a single work item.
* Adds an explicit pre_traverse step do any pre-processing and determine whether
we need to traverse at all.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b9a8ccd775c3192e3810a1730b1d0bc2b5c9dfb6
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Since we pass around a reference to the one `PerLevelTraversalData` object in sequential traversal, we must update it after we process children. Alternatively, we could switch to what the parallel traversal is doing and clone the object when passing it down.
r? @emilio
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#14414 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c2515f9c9822b6011fc6f8ad7127bccc3a1e6122
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
I think I got the numbers right, want to do a try run before just in case.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2289ad53dd9a2666645b1f7eef07636e21c1607e
This is a continuation of the work in #13951. I'm separating it out into a separate PR since the aforementioned patch has a green try run and this one doesn't yet.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b611e5c3b219e8f6aa9a7937aa7f5ea552762cd4
This is another chunk of work to move us toward the new incremental restyle architecture.
Eventually, we'll make a fine-grained decision at each node about what style to recompute based on the RestyleHint on the node data (along with other things). For now, we use the existence of RestyleData as a coarse-grained approximation of this.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c8b6ece97b6eec8ac4e16a7a79a605356279cfb6
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
See the first commit's description for a bit of background. I'm making the PR in this state just to verify against try I've handled all cases of possibly incorrect sharing and, if not, fix it.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#12534
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ec7efff14bf775d400ae768d8cb4ba1dac88ab59
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
r? @bholley
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1b2450339c40dbcb65e94a346ea434d45f0edf90
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests because geckolib :-(
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
r? @bholley
cc @heycam
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: cbf71a2cf39e792f75309e68f7cabe862d4a70eb
This commit adds hooks to the Servo style traversal to avoid traversing all the
DOM for every restyle. Additionally it changes the behavior of the dirty flag to
be propagated top down, to prevent extra overhead when an element is dirtied.
This commit doesn't aim to change the behavior on Servo just yet, since Servo does extra job when dirtying the node related with DOM revision counters that might be necessary.
CC @asajeffrey for the DOM revision counters stuff. When a node is dirty, do all its descendants really need to increment the revision counter, or is this an unintended effect? My intuition is that this is hurting performance quite a lot for servo.
r? @bholley
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests because no geckolib tests yet.
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 944d371b8f0e72f6aa5465be38c0c8daeab66127
Right now, there's a huge amount of complexity in T{Node,Element,Document} and friends because of the lifetime parameter.
Before I started generalizing this code for use by Gecko, these wrappers were plain structs. They had (and still have) a phantom lifetime associated with them to prevent references to DOM nodes from leaking past the end of restyle, when they might be invalidated by a GC.
When I generalized them, I decided to put the lifetime on the trait as well, since there are some situations where the lifetime is, in fact, necessary. Specifically, they are necessary for the compiler to understand that all the things borrowed from all the nodes and elements and so on have the same lifetime (the lifetime of the restyle), rather than the lifetime of whichever particular element or node pointer the value was borrowed from. This come up in situations where we do |let el = node.as_element()| or |let n = el.as_node()| and then borrow something from the result. The compiler thinks the borrow lifetime is that of |el| or |n|, when it's actually longer.
In practice though, I think the style and layout algorithms we use don't run into this issue much, and we can hack around it where it comes up. So I think we should remove the lifetimes from the traits, which will let us aggregate the embedding-provided traits together onto a single meta-trait and significantly simplify the code.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: aea8d8959dcb157a8cc381f1403246ce8ca1ca00
This should be the last major hoisting necessary to use the style system standalone. \o/
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ddc3b7942eea8328e9eb22d864d34fce572d5535
