This will apply to cron tasks, action tasks, and decision tasks. It is a
distinct retrigger implementation because (a) we do not want to follow
dependencies, and (b) it takes a lot of scopes to create a decision task, so we
need to limit access to this action.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 21DVSiagcrO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6f027e349e245e4aa4dbed81145a0a5d75218cb1
extra : histedit_source : eff99aee5a0e7496b0734748b29739480eb0e3fb
It is not at *all* clear how multiple optimizations for a single task should
interact. No simple logical operation is right in all cases, and in fact in
most imaginable cases the desired behavior turns out to be independent of all
but one of the optimizations. For example, given both `seta` and
`skip-unless-files-changed` optimizations, if SETA says to skip a test, it is
low value and should be skipped regardless of what files have changed. But if
SETA says to run a test, then it has likely been skipped in previous pushes, so
it should be run regardless of what has changed in this push.
This also adds a bit more output about optimization, that may be useful for
anyone wondering why a particular job didn't run.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3OsvRnWjai4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ba0aa536e8c474b36c63d1447c83ed9885f1e3e6
extra : source : a3b7bdfdb116300daa3f49e0dfc96177e1369440
It is not at *all* clear how multiple optimizations for a single task should
interact. No simple logical operation is right in all cases, and in fact in
most imaginable cases the desired behavior turns out to be independent of all
but one of the optimizations. For example, given both `seta` and
`skip-unless-files-changed` optimizations, if SETA says to skip a test, it is
low value and should be skipped regardless of what files have changed. But if
SETA says to run a test, then it has likely been skipped in previous pushes, so
it should be run regardless of what has changed in this push.
This also adds a bit more output about optimization, that may be useful for
anyone wondering why a particular job didn't run.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3OsvRnWjai4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d5bce42fc0ea24616d885eed62e5e5a42b4fce24
extra : source : a3b7bdfdb116300daa3f49e0dfc96177e1369440
It is not at *all* clear how multiple optimizations for a single task should
interact. No simple logical operation is right in all cases, and in fact in
most imaginable cases the desired behavior turns out to be independent of all
but one of the optimizations. For example, given both `seta` and
`skip-unless-files-changed` optimizations, if SETA says to skip a test, it is
low value and should be skipped regardless of what files have changed. But if
SETA says to run a test, then it has likely been skipped in previous pushes, so
it should be run regardless of what has changed in this push.
This also adds a bit more output about optimization, that may be useful for
anyone wondering why a particular job didn't run.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3OsvRnWjai4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4ac6a5cc592f4210918c73e667f3b5dd50230894
These tests can now be run with:
./mach python-test taskcluster/taskgraph
or:
./mach python-test taskcluster
They can now run in parallel by passing in -j.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JXeZV8B04Sf
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7427f96facaf75e6b6fcca532027c68fb6c1a1a3
These tests can now be run with:
./mach python-test taskcluster/taskgraph
or:
./mach python-test taskcluster
They can now run in parallel by passing in -j.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JXeZV8B04Sf
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a8bb8c21d4c9722bf630c426a780f856fffc8cdb
This is needed before we can upgrade to flake8 3.3.0, as that version starts flagging these errors.
These files were modified by running:
autopep8 --select E305 --in-place -r <dir>
on the affected directories. I did it one dir at a time and verified the result after each.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FmlsfiKIbtr
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9df32258cadff5d27a0e72113c57f782756c0b18
Note that the to_json method prefers the taskgraph's dependencies information
(edges) to that from the task.dependencies entries. At a few points in
task-graph generation, these values differ, although that is expected (for
example, the full task set contains no edges, but that information is still in
task.dependencies). Unifying that representation leads to some difficulty with
task transforms that reach into the dependency tree (beetmover), so the
different representations are left as-is.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GeW8HNwFA9Z
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 549773e05e18371a399612d9bceccffc29be8cf2
Considering docker images contents depend very much on the moment they
were built, it is possible that two images with the same hash in the
taskcluster index (at different levels) have different contents. When
this happens, the build or test results could be significantly
different between e.g. try and mozilla-central, possibly leading to
misleading results at landing time.
So if for some reason multiple levels have images for the same hash, the
one used at the highest level should be prefered, such that try uses the
same as mozilla-central once mozilla-central generates the image for
that hash, even if there is an image previously generated for try.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 57f593a530da02f9f576872404915c26af544688
* Compress docker images with zstd
* Removed need for context.tar from decision task
* Index images by level rather than project
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4RL4QXNWmpd
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 677d8030a15af3288866a70fc648a10b22c396a3
This introduces a completely new way of specifying test task in-tree,
completely replacing the old spider-web of YAML files.
The high-level view is this:
- some configuration files are used to determine which test suites to run
for each test platform, and against which build platforms
- each test suite is then represented by a dictionary, and modified by a
sequence of transforms, duplicating as necessary (e.g., chunks), until
it becomes a task definition
The transforms allow sufficient generality to support just about any desired
configuration, with the advantage that common configurations are "easy" while
unusual configurations are supported but notable for their oddness (they
require a custom transform).
As of this commit, this system produces the same set of test graphs as the
existing YAML, modulo:
- extra.treeherder.groupName -- this was not consistent in the YAML
- extra.treeherder.build -- this is ignored by taskcluster-treeherder anyway
- mozharness command argument order
- boolean True values for environment variables are now the string "true"
- metadata -- this is now much more consistent, with task name being the label
Testing of this commit demonstrates that it produces the same set of test tasks for
the following projects (those which had special cases defined in the YAML):
- autoland
- ash (*)
- willow
- mozilla-inbound
- mozilla-central
- try:
-b do -p all -t all -u all
-b d -p linux64,linux64-asan -u reftest -t none
-b d -p linux64,linux64-asan -u reftest[x64] -t none[x64]
(*) this patch omits the linux64/debug tc-M-e10s(dt) test, which is enabled on
ash; ash will require a small changeset to re-enable this test.
IGNORE BAD COMMIT MESSAGES (because the hook flags try syntax!)
MozReview-Commit-ID: G34dg9f17Hq
--HG--
rename : taskcluster/taskgraph/kind/base.py => taskcluster/taskgraph/task/base.py
rename : taskcluster/taskgraph/kind/docker_image.py => taskcluster/taskgraph/task/docker_image.py
rename : taskcluster/taskgraph/kind/legacy.py => taskcluster/taskgraph/task/legacy.py
extra : rebase_source : 03e70902c2d3a297eb9e3ce852f8737c2550d5a6
extra : histedit_source : d4d9f4b192605af21f41d83495fc3c923759c3cb
