This fixes the fallout from the mach command not being updated for 69c60c8fc528d8d038e22a2ae62f5ff7b1131231.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7WZ8wW4gnCY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 36caffb4a8631ea478ec6f8d509a82c01016eeb5
This fixes the fallout from the mach command not being updated for 69c60c8fc528d8d038e22a2ae62f5ff7b1131231.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7WZ8wW4gnCY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 887b386480b9cb69c8b7e0196851862fceec2dfe
Tasks that have the 'always_target' attribute set will be always be included
in the target_task_graph, regardless of target task filtering.
Furthermore, if they were only added because of this attribute (i.e, the
filters would have excluded the task), then the task will be a candidate for
optimization even if the 'optimize_target_tasks' parameter is False.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9eoVJ5qpAMO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9635002720d088ca9870649f3143d6293c666610
This is needed to prevent parameter mismatch errors when using |mach try fuzzy|
from an older revision. This can happen if the parameters.yml is being
downloaded from a commit with a recently added parameter.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4NxCM7i8B4W
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c47de38ad295e14c80c99806ea430fa641ae2be6
This is needed to prevent parameter mismatch errors when using |mach try fuzzy|
from an older revision. This can happen if the parameters.yml is being
downloaded from a commit with a recently added parameter.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4NxCM7i8B4W
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4d2052aae33292fbd7928a79bfedba76426206b9
Add a release promotion custom action for releng's TC release promotion migration work.
This action generates a graph dependent on previously built tasks. To track these, we add the `do_not_optimize` and `existing_tasks` parameters. The `do_not_optimize` parameter specifies tasks that we want to explicitly exclude from taskgraph optimization. The `existing_tasks` parameter specifies a label-to-taskid map for tasks from previous graphs.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1vKrNUavM4V
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b8ba95d270aafe1464c2b3bfc318b9568500a7a1
This sets the try_mode property, and parses the try message (if given), early
in the decision task and puts the results into the parameters.
The proximate need is to set optimze_target_tasks for some try modes and not
others. This also replaces the existing logic for parsing messages for certain
kinds, and makes the distinction between the different try modes a little
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AXJEGLh6pEV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 25e9966696d78d899783d9f38533d5ae66f9ccb9
extra : source : b53ff084c2d7968a1d9864d1343f2d9381fb652b
It is not at *all* clear how multiple optimizations for a single task should
interact. No simple logical operation is right in all cases, and in fact in
most imaginable cases the desired behavior turns out to be independent of all
but one of the optimizations. For example, given both `seta` and
`skip-unless-files-changed` optimizations, if SETA says to skip a test, it is
low value and should be skipped regardless of what files have changed. But if
SETA says to run a test, then it has likely been skipped in previous pushes, so
it should be run regardless of what has changed in this push.
This also adds a bit more output about optimization, that may be useful for
anyone wondering why a particular job didn't run.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3OsvRnWjai4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ba0aa536e8c474b36c63d1447c83ed9885f1e3e6
extra : source : a3b7bdfdb116300daa3f49e0dfc96177e1369440
This sets the try_mode property, and parses the try message (if given), early
in the decision task and puts the results into the parameters.
The proximate need is to set optimze_target_tasks for some try modes and not
others. This also replaces the existing logic for parsing messages for certain
kinds, and makes the distinction between the different try modes a little
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AXJEGLh6pEV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 03a10610aa3337269fe76a1196bb9b1665e1ab20
extra : source : b53ff084c2d7968a1d9864d1343f2d9381fb652b
It is not at *all* clear how multiple optimizations for a single task should
interact. No simple logical operation is right in all cases, and in fact in
most imaginable cases the desired behavior turns out to be independent of all
but one of the optimizations. For example, given both `seta` and
`skip-unless-files-changed` optimizations, if SETA says to skip a test, it is
low value and should be skipped regardless of what files have changed. But if
SETA says to run a test, then it has likely been skipped in previous pushes, so
it should be run regardless of what has changed in this push.
This also adds a bit more output about optimization, that may be useful for
anyone wondering why a particular job didn't run.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3OsvRnWjai4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d5bce42fc0ea24616d885eed62e5e5a42b4fce24
extra : source : a3b7bdfdb116300daa3f49e0dfc96177e1369440
This sets the try_mode property, and parses the try message (if given), early
in the decision task and puts the results into the parameters.
The proximate need is to set optimze_target_tasks for some try modes and not
others. This also replaces the existing logic for parsing messages for certain
kinds, and makes the distinction between the different try modes a little
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AXJEGLh6pEV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fdd8c3cfb9abf759a3c43c5713e62e4772c5bd06
It is not at *all* clear how multiple optimizations for a single task should
interact. No simple logical operation is right in all cases, and in fact in
most imaginable cases the desired behavior turns out to be independent of all
but one of the optimizations. For example, given both `seta` and
`skip-unless-files-changed` optimizations, if SETA says to skip a test, it is
low value and should be skipped regardless of what files have changed. But if
SETA says to run a test, then it has likely been skipped in previous pushes, so
it should be run regardless of what has changed in this push.
This also adds a bit more output about optimization, that may be useful for
anyone wondering why a particular job didn't run.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3OsvRnWjai4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4ac6a5cc592f4210918c73e667f3b5dd50230894
This provides a mechanism to modify the behaviour of tasks from a try push. The try_task_config.json
looks something like:
{
"tasks": ["build-linux64/opt", "test-linux64/opt-mochitest-e10s-1"],
"templates": {
"artifact": {"enabled": 1}
}
}
This tells taskgraph to apply the 'artifact' template to all tasks. Templates are JSONe based
.yml files that live under taskcluster/taskgraph/templates. Taskgraph will render every template
against every task definition. The templates themselves can then use JSONe condition statements to
filter out which tasks they should or shouldn't apply to.
MozReview-Commit-ID: J8HVZzOt4mX
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 95a78bc56d3f90ff1b34aabd84ed92aff1e3d954
Graph morphs modify the graph after optimization, without changing its meaning.
In this case, that means adding index tasks that will insert paths into the
index beyond the relatively limited number afforded in task.routes.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AJy4exX7q2v
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d61e7462defd41e7112739fb057edb493f495430
extra : source : c580568ed47c1ed2af40d98b47fbb0d136e63060
Instead of using a class's static method, use a simple function, specified by
the `loader` key.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IeOl9qiSCXf
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 72e0a9dd8385b250a46c9f4adf8a8a0e5b01c156
We add the following command line options to Taskcluster try syntax:
--spsProfile - enable profile mode.
--rebuild-talos <N> - retrigger talos tests N times.
--setenv <VAR>=<val> - add extra environments variables.
--tag <TAG> - run tests only the tag TAG.
--no-retry - doesn't retry failed jobs.
We have a chicken-egg problem, as we first generate the full task graph
and then parse the try message. But the graph generation step needs to
know the try message to process the aforementioned options. The
solution is to parse the message before graph generation and then
pass the command line options to the transforms. Then, each transform
can look at the option that interests it and process it accordingly.
The message parse function is configured in kind.yml, which gives some
flexibility for future implementations of alternative syntaxes.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GPFdi0FD6Vn
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b992786158851f1099aedfce8669a163228edc51
We add the following command line options to Taskcluster try syntax:
--spsProfile - enable profile mode.
--rebuild-talos <N> - retrigger talos tests N times.
--setenv <VAR>=<val> - add extra environments variables.
--tag <TAG> - run tests only the tag TAG.
--no-retry - doesn't retry failed jobs.
We have a chicken-egg problem, as we first generate the full task graph
and then parse the try message. But the graph generation step needs to
know the try message to process the aforementioned options. The
solution is to parse the message before graph generation and then
pass the command line options to the transforms. Then, each transform
can look at the option that interests it and process it accordingly.
The message parse function is configured in kind.yml, which gives some
flexibility for future implementations of alternative syntaxes.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DMwRjuV2vpf
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 211ecf52694078986caf290c5b0cca35c775da61
We add the following command line options to Taskcluster try syntax:
--spsProfile: enable profile mode.
--rebuild-talos <N>: retrigger talos tests N times.
--setenv <VAR>=<val>: add extra environments variables.
--tag <TAG>: run tests only the tag TAG.
--no-retry: doesn't retry failed jobs.
We have a chicken-egg problem, as we first generate the full task graph
and then parse the try message. But the graph generation step needs to
know the try message to process the aforementioned options. The
solution is to parse the message before graph generation and then
pass the command line options to the transforms. Then, each transform
can look at the option that interests it and process it accordingly.
The message parse function is configured in kind.yml, which gives some
flexibility for future implementations of alternative syntaxes.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EQlE6q5E8z7
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4b7323cd915e8ef9820816015b4b45524811eaf1
Previously, we ran a single "target task" function to mutate the full
task graph into a subset based on input parameters (try syntax,
repository being built for, etc). This concept is useful. But
the implementation was limiting because we could only have a single
"target tasks" function.
This commit introduces the concept of "filters." They conceptually
do the same thing as "target tasks methods" but you can run more than
1 of them.
Filters are simply functions that examine an input graph+parameters
and emit nodes that should be retained. Filters, like target tasks
methods, are defined via decorated functions in a module.
TaskGraphGenerator has been converted to use filters. The list of
defined filters can be defined in the parameters dict passed into
TaskGraphGenerator. A default filter list is provided in decision.py.
The intent is to eventually convert target tasks to filters. Until
that happens, we always run the registered target tasks method via
a filter proxy function.
No new tests have been added because we don't yet have any
functionality relying explicitly on filters. Tests will be added in
a subsequent commit once we add a new filter.
While I was here, I also snuck in some logging on the size of the
graphs.
MozReview-Commit-ID: ERn2hIYbMRp
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 36b8e86aa64b2f52b03b31b5497759b0009fb921
Previously, all callers outside of tests that passed
"target_tasks_method" to TaskGraphGenerator all used the same pattern
of looking for a key in the parameters and calling a function in
the target_tasks module.
Future commits will refactor how target tasks graph work. To
make the transition easier, we move the logic for obtaining the
target tasks method into TaskGraphGenerator.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3QU09iGhoXh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fbcc31d705c4b0e148aa3709ddcb18ad99953231
Version control tends to leave kind directories around containing .orig files
or other such detritus. It's best to just ignore such directories, rather than
failing to generate the taskgraph.
MozReview-Commit-ID: B9GIZndbfi1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 58f1debe5219fc52ead2971718da932b63bb06d7
Before, we'd open files and feed bytes to yaml.load(). When a str
is fed to yaml.load(), it attempts to guess the encoding. It defaults
to UTF-8 unless somebody set us up the BOM. This is probably OK.
Except if the file isn't valid UTF-8, the exception will be raised
in the bowels of YAML parsing and it may not be obvious the failure
is due to invalid UTF-8 input versus say Python str/unicode
coercion foo.
We change all call sites that load YAML from a file to use
codecs.open() to open the file in UTF-8 and perform UTF-8
decoding/validation at file read time. This should make any UTF-8
failures more obvious. Furthermore, it reinforces that our YAML files
are UTF-8 and not some other encoding.
I discovered this issue as part of trying to get emoji symbols to
render on Treeherder. Unfortunately, it appears pyyaml detects
many emoji as unprintable characters and refuses to load them. This
makes me sad and makes me want to abandon pyyaml/YAML in favor of
something that supports emoji :P
MozReview-Commit-ID: AOvAruZFfnK
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4c5d42cb63da5c9ebfac55ab84b4f7f8bcc648fa
This introduces a completely new way of specifying test task in-tree,
completely replacing the old spider-web of YAML files.
The high-level view is this:
- some configuration files are used to determine which test suites to run
for each test platform, and against which build platforms
- each test suite is then represented by a dictionary, and modified by a
sequence of transforms, duplicating as necessary (e.g., chunks), until
it becomes a task definition
The transforms allow sufficient generality to support just about any desired
configuration, with the advantage that common configurations are "easy" while
unusual configurations are supported but notable for their oddness (they
require a custom transform).
As of this commit, this system produces the same set of test graphs as the
existing YAML, modulo:
- extra.treeherder.groupName -- this was not consistent in the YAML
- extra.treeherder.build -- this is ignored by taskcluster-treeherder anyway
- mozharness command argument order
- boolean True values for environment variables are now the string "true"
- metadata -- this is now much more consistent, with task name being the label
Testing of this commit demonstrates that it produces the same set of test tasks for
the following projects (those which had special cases defined in the YAML):
- autoland
- ash (*)
- willow
- mozilla-inbound
- mozilla-central
- try:
-b do -p all -t all -u all
-b d -p linux64,linux64-asan -u reftest -t none
-b d -p linux64,linux64-asan -u reftest[x64] -t none[x64]
(*) this patch omits the linux64/debug tc-M-e10s(dt) test, which is enabled on
ash; ash will require a small changeset to re-enable this test.
IGNORE BAD COMMIT MESSAGES (because the hook flags try syntax!)
MozReview-Commit-ID: G34dg9f17Hq
--HG--
rename : taskcluster/taskgraph/kind/base.py => taskcluster/taskgraph/task/base.py
rename : taskcluster/taskgraph/kind/docker_image.py => taskcluster/taskgraph/task/docker_image.py
rename : taskcluster/taskgraph/kind/legacy.py => taskcluster/taskgraph/task/legacy.py
extra : rebase_source : 03e70902c2d3a297eb9e3ce852f8737c2550d5a6
extra : histedit_source : d4d9f4b192605af21f41d83495fc3c923759c3cb
