This happens asynchronously, just as it does in non-WebRender mode.
This functionality is a prerequisite for doing proper display-list-based
hit testing in WebRender, since it moves the scroll offsets into Servo
(and, specifically, into the script thread, enabling iframe event
forwarding) instead of keeping them private to WebRender.
Requires servo/webrender_traits#55 and servo/webrender#277.
Partially addresses #11108.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 27d1f182713077395426a53a9c91ec35c95887ee
This is the first part of #10185. More to follow. I have built this locally with both servo and geckolib without errors; let's see if it succeeds on all platforms as well.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 639fdd6b128e0cfd418e4ae0dd78de3f5aecac4c
The old code tried to do the speculation as a single bottom-up pass
after intrinsic inline-size calculation, which was unable to handle
cases like this:
<div>
<div style="float: left">Foo</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="overflow: hidden">Bar</div>
</div>
No single bottom-up pass could possibly handle this case, because the
inline-size of the float flowing out of the "Foo" block could never make
it down to the "Bar" block, where it is needed for speculation.
On the pages I tried, this regresses layout performance by 1%-2%.
I first noticed this breaking some pages, like the Google SERPs, several
months ago.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1554331f06900e69f246ed9986a08aae91a0a71e
This allows geckolib to pass gecko style structs and have the style system write to them directly, provided we implement all the traits.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 605842f193aedc1151ab38a99c49f693c76e5cf3
Flat display lists were a 2x regression on the spheres demo. This patch series fixes that.
See the individual commits for more details.
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 55fc48e4c46917a0f036d0054fac296bb5719434
Instead of producing a tree of stacking contexts, display list
generation now produces a flat list of display items and a tree of
stacking contexts. This will eventually allow display list construction
to produce and modify WebRender vertex buffers directly, removing the
overhead of display list conversion. This change also moves
layerization of the display list to the paint thread, since it isn't
currently useful for WebRender.
To accomplish this, display list generation now takes three passes of
the flow tree:
1. Calculation of absolute positions.
2. Collection of a tree of stacking contexts.
3. Creation of a list of display items.
After collection of display items, they are sorted based upon the index
of their parent stacking contexts and their position in CSS 2.1
Appendeix E stacking order.
This is a big change, but it actually simplifies display list generation.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 62814f7cb486bc267a796b7ce58c51d59240fad0
Use the PrintTree utility to improve the readability of flow tree
dumps. Blocks and fragments are now split over two dump levels, because
otherwise they are impenetrable. Also start printing the restyle damage of
fragments.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a2330f494316926dca9f64431d8357a093143d7d
This is a direct extract from my abandoned PR for a lint (#7546), along with some rather clumsy modifications (only on `components/script/dom/mod.rs` and `components/style/lib.rs`), because I had to sort some of the files again to make peace with tidy, which hasn't been educated about sorting yet!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a7208869f2903e36f9b2f540b55b50283d7df466
Elided almost all the lifetimes and removed needless returns. Mostly done by sed + manual fixes.
r? @nox
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c2c2646d37614ece5869af861993c3d619f6e003
The failing `float-applies-to-*` CSS 2.1 tests never really should have
been passing in the first place; they depend on floats inside
fixed-layout tables working properly, which they don't.
Closes#6078.
Closes#6709.
Closes#6858.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1ddef2997abf51716835017225b282f8a9077cce
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
This improves Servo's performance on large pages.
Please double-check the logic when it comes to nested layers—I'm sure I've messed up some of the geometry calculations :)
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0880e54f987bac7c34c934ef6ee36f46475b06e3
--HG--
rename : servo/tests/html/lipsum.html => servo/tests/html/lipsum-large.html
Table columns should be layed out according to the 'direction' property of the
table flow, regardless of the 'direction' property of any table-row,
table-rowgroup, etc. flows.
This fixes a number of the `direction-applies-to-*` tests in the CSS2.1 test
suite.
This also simplifies `propagate_column_inline_sizes_to_child` by separating
the code used for table cells from the code for non-cell flows.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 844ac2915eab6573c43e7648cfa94cc2d97fa901
This add some properties to the style system and a new flow type, but the larger issues of dealing with fragmentation in the flow tree is still an open question.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1e150140bd12624ad357e3168fb496079fb8ec7c
--HG--
rename : servo/components/layout/table_caption.rs => servo/components/layout/multicol.rs
Fixes#5300, which it is a rebase of.
Known issues:
* Collapsed borders do not correctly affect the border-box of the table
itself.
* The content widths of all cells in a column and the content height of
all cells in a row is the same in this patch, but not in Gecko and
WebKit.
* Corners are not painted well. The spec does not say what to do here.
* Column spans are not handled well. The spec does not say what to do
here either.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8a4555cc53bc1bbb21a08eb6f010cb1215034419
Before this change, Servo used one code path that computed the position
of flows with `position: static` or `position: relative` and another
separate code path that computed the position of flows with `position:
absolute` or `position: fixed`. The latter code attempted to duplicate
the former code to determine the static position of hypothetical boxes,
but this was both fragile and incorrect in the case of hypothetical
boxes nested inside floats. In fact, it's impossible to determine the
static position of an absolute flow relative to its containing block at
inline-size assignment time, because that static position could depend
on a float that cannot be placed until block-size assignment!
This patch changes block layout to use the same code path for static
positioning of regular flows and static positioning of absolute flows
where applicable. This both simplifies the code and improves its
efficiency, since it allows the `hypothetical_position` field and
`static_block_offsets` data structure to be removed. Moreover, it
improves correctness in the above case (which the new reftest checks).
This allows the sidebar in Facebook Timeline to be positioned properly.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bdcf606f4802e5b1ab3ee251b45ee1e81800359a
As far as I can tell, this is a cut-and-paste of old buggy code from
block flows. Delegating to the correct block flow code fixes the sidebar
float placement on Guardians of the Galaxy.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f4da0f0e94259e12adeb193fd9ecf6813457b883
This fixes a bug in finding the top left corner of an RTL block in physical coordinates. (The old code used the `start` point of the `position` rect, which is not always the top left.)
It also fixes the setting of `position.start.i` in certain mixed LTR/RTL cases.
There is still a bug related to `position.size` for RTL blocks with margins. See the FIXME comments for details.
r? @pcwalton or @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b255b49e2e2246ff8bf7f8751088bfe0a0ee41a2
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8e811229bae6b338fabcd7df602079730c942889
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Reconstructed from #5138 via raw diffing.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fd1bb49a65dd998c8ef9890a1576aaf62ddfdba1
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Moved from #4544, because Critic.
Fixes#4544.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5cd6316addc1acf145ed3220719387ef6ef08d2f
