It’s deprecated in the #6850 rustup.
The first commit changes some behavior which was previously incorrect: the spec says indices in DOM strings are UTF-16 code units, not `char` code points.
The second commit should not change behavior, unless I made a mistake.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2ca48ca4047e83e69abf1fad6978de46ef11c3a7
Also adds HeapSizeOf implementations/derive for some types. I've used "Cannot calculate Heap size" as a reason everywhere, because my imagination is rather limited. If you'd like me to change this message for specific types, please write something like this: "Trusted - Cannot calculate Heap size for Trusted" so that it would be easier for me to replace them through a script :)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a03616f379c255cc6c9b6e1d04dd7d98bd9926ce
…s for frame treese in script tasks.
This underreports by a significant amount, since only Document, Window and CharacterData (ie. text) nodes are fully represented. That being said, every HTML element in the tree is measured, but only counted as a Node. It's easy to improve this, it just requires adding the appropriate HeapSizeOf derives and increasing the granularity of `measure_memory_for_eventtarget`. google.com shows a dom-tree value of 0.24 MB for me at the moment.
r? @nnethercote
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 84e25befdd97cf74fb00707dbe150d59d980e977
For now, this just gives some purpose to the abandoned receiver and later selects over the two receivers (for #6767). (oh wait, forgot to check the local build - there are still a few errors)...
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: effb17b3368769baaf5247908b26b7f0dd370ea3
StrExt::slice_chars is deprecated and will be removed in Rust. This
lifts the implementation from Rust libstd and puts it in util::str.
This fixes a bunch of deprecation warnings in Servo.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a54404c92180b839d2cf089d9ec9a6afe8bd5ba3
This virtual method mimics the behaviour of mutation observers and make it more viable than the older child_inserted(), which didn't cover removed nodes and was called as many times as there were inserted nodes.
A few other shortcomings where remove_child() was called directly instead of Node::remove() were also fixed while at it.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 705c95dedbbaa60ffd08e70579915e228d5b6ee0
We've had problems with this before, and I think it's starting to cause
problems again.
See PRs #6629 and #6616; my current theory is that this is the problem.
r? @larsbergstrom
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0d7744b198d95bc2dae31a2cd48bdef1b1eeb792
SpiderMonkey provides an extremely fine-grained breakdown of memory
usage, but for Servo we aggregate the measurements into a small number
of coarse buckets, which seems appropriate for the current level of
detail provided by Servo's memory profiler. Sample output:
```
| 17.41 MiB -- url(file:///home/njn/moz/servo/../servo-static-suite/wikipedia/Guardians%20of%20the%20Galaxy%20(film)%20-%20Wikipedia,%20the%20free%20encyclopedia.html)
| 7.32 MiB -- js
| 3.07 MiB -- malloc-heap
| 3.00 MiB -- gc-heap
| 2.48 MiB -- used
| 0.34 MiB -- decommitted
| 0.09 MiB -- unused
| 0.09 MiB -- admin
| 1.25 MiB -- non-heap
```
Most of the changes are plumbing to get the script task communicating
with the memory profiler task.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2b0bdbe1c195f2f6dd7671981999d622c505fbc5
This will make it easier to adapt to IPC.
The trickiest part here was to make script tasks spawn new layout tasks
directly instead of having the pipeline do it for them. The latter
approach will not work in multiprocess mode, because layout and script
must run in the same address space and the pipeline cannot inject tasks
into another process.
r? @larsbergstrom
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e06eaa0064f49bc215e3851f0a3686e1191b356a
Didn't touch mozjs or rust-mozjs because implementing that in the code generator didn't seem too easy. I'm using the same workaround that the TextDecoder does.
Using the OsRng should be the right choice here? As the OS keeps state for us we wouldn't need to have a global rng instance to keep around.
Fixes#4666.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c0222628264423a67bf98775be83dcf2f85211ab
fixes#6524. I had to make an additional change not mentioned in the ticket - adding the `#[feature]` to enable deriving custom traits but I assume that's expected at this time.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bbb39082e0f640400546d2084a450a8675820a82
It is unstable and not really better than the stable alternative.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 46709edaf839eb77893eef3f4d01c568c46c98fe
html5ever now uses the Tendril string type to minimize copying internally, but Servo still converts from/to `String` at the boundary (which involves copying).
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2165c55d645f59ef413f09c2b023d511bc8c402e
> Here it is.
>
> ~~There's two major things that are unfinished here:~~
> - ~~Dealing with the unroot_must_root lint. I'm not sure about the value of this lint with the new rooting API.~~ Done.
> - ~~Updating the Cargo.locks to point to the new SM and SM binding.~~ Done.
>
> I also included my fixes for the rust update, but these will disappear in a rebase. A rust update is necessary to support calling `Drop` on `Heap<T>` correctly when `Heap<T>` is inside a `Rc<T>`. Otherwise `&self` points to the wrong location.
>
> Incremental GC is disabled here. I'm not sure how to deal with the incremental barriers so that's left for later.
>
> Generational GC works. SM doesn't work without it.
>
> The biggest change here is to the rooting API. `Root` was made movable, and `Temporary` and `JSRef` was removed. Movable `Root`s means there's no need for `Temporary`, and `JSRef`s aren't needed generally since it can be assumed that being able to obtain a reference to a dom object means it's already rooted. References have their lifetime bound to the Roots that provided them. DOM objects that haven't passed through `reflect_dom_object` don't need to be rooted, and DOM objects that have passed through `reflect_dom_object` can't be obtained without being rooted through `native_from_reflector_jsmanaged` or `JS::<T>::root()`.
>
> Support for `Heap<T>` ended up messier than I expected. It's split into two commits, but only because it's a bit difficult to fold them together. Supporting `Heap<T>` properly requires that that `Heap::<T>::set()` be called on something that won't move. I removed the Copy and Clone trait from `Heap<T>` so `Cell` can't hold `Heap<T>` - only `UnsafeCell` can hold it.
>
> `CallbackObject` is a bit tricky - I moved all callbacks into `Rc<T>` in order to make sure that the pointer inside to a `*mut JSObject` doesn't move. This is necessary for supporting `Heap<T>`.
>
> `RootedCollectionSet` is very general purpose now. Anything with `JSTraceable` can be rooted by `RootedCollectionSet`/`RootedTraceable`. Right now, `RootedTraceable` is only used to hold down dom objects before they're fully attached to their reflector. I had to make a custom mechanism to dispatch the trace call - couldn't figure out how to get trait objects working for this case.
>
> This has been tested with the following zeal settings:
>
> GC after every allocation
> JS_GC_ZEAL=2,1
>
> GC after every 100 allocations (important for catching use-after-free bugs)
> JS_GC_ZEAL=2,100
>
> Verify pre barriers
> JS_GC_ZEAL=4,1
>
> Verify post barriers
> JS_GC_ZEAL=11,1
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e7808c526c348fea5e3b48af70b7f1a066652097
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
It seems @hyowon uploaded her canvas shadow patch faster than me; I've handled the color dependency a bit different, this way `gfx_traits` is not required by the script module.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c8c7bd900dde73d4fddafea8239f44440f1c863b
The first step of the implementation for shadows in canvas.
r? @nox @jdm
cc @yichoi
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f163f2bf0d32861ea20470d405bb517ed5b09e84
The util component specified fnv and smallvec as dependencies and publicly
reexported both of them. Several other components utilized these reexports,
presumably because fnv and smallvec used to live in the tree so reexporting
made the transition easier.
These indirect dependencies through the util component are unnecessary.
This commit removes the fnv & smallvec crate reexports in the util component.
It exchange, it adds fnv & smallvec as dependencies to non-util components
wherever needed. Finally, it removes the fnv dependency from util as it is not
utilized anywhere in the util component.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 35000a9b854dc0989cc473aaec0ea8c082521c66
This moves webdriver_traits into msg to avoid a circular dependency.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d08995e1a94fa093b7fc1e5d918d9dca79f260d6
r? @jdm
I couldn't add the `getContextAttributes` method since `CodegenRust`
doesn't know how to return a dictionary value, I'll take a look at it ASAP.
I think the helper functions can return directly the renderer, since they're used just for that, but I wanted to hear your opinions about this.
By the way I'm interested in adding more serious tests for WebGL, and I think the [khronos conformance suit](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/tree/master/conformance-suites/1.0.3) should be the best option.
Should I try to integrate it in wpt, or making a `tests/webgl` directory (or similar) inside the servo tree? (Maybe this question should be for @Ms2ger)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0de09b936e5e37c15b7865157a98ad78b1077659
I've done a bit of job to get this done. Right now readback is still used, but we have a `LayerId` -> `CanvasRenderer` map on the paint task, that we can use to get rid of that.
I'd want review, to see if this is a good approach (I know it's not the initial `CanvasId` -> renderer approach, but it's pretty similar, since a canvas involves a `PaintLayer`).
I had to do a bit of refactoring to avoid cyclic dependencies between canvas and gfx. I'd want you to review them too.
It's mergeable and doesn't break any tests :P
Some of my main concerns:
* Does the canvas render really need to be behind an `Arc<Mutex<T>>`?
* I can't clone a `NativeSurface` right now (that's why the `SendNativeSurface()` msg is unimplemented in the WebGL task). It should be easy to add that to rust-layers, supposing the caller is responsible to mark it as non-leaking, any reason to not do it?
cc @jdm @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ad53e95080144485e74cd9b9d48ce75e20de4e36
--HG--
rename : servo/components/gfx/color.rs => servo/components/gfx_traits/color.rs
This implements a simple load-tracking system and tracks stylesheet loads as an example of how it fits together. This is a simplified and rebased version of #3714; I do not believe that the main thrust of hsivonen's comments (related to tracking navigation in browsing contexts) affect this part of the work.
r? @Ms2ger
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2baa69595e2d57213c34b7e168b60885948fa85b
...ed test_clipboard_paste to the "test-unit" suite.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5cb1356e9e3dbde9fd841c9aa2d21ea39c5eda18
A rebuild after touching components/profile/mem.rs now takes 48 seconds (and
only rebuilds `profile` and `servo`) which is much lower than it used to be.
In comparison, a rebuild after touching components/profile_traits/mem.rs takes
294 seconds and rebuilds many more crates.
This change also removes some unnecessary crate dependencies in `net` and
`net_traits`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 77f653da2c4120ea7ac1a946d97fc70059d513d4
--HG--
rename : servo/tests/unit/gfx/lib.rs => servo/components/profile_traits/lib.rs
This implements a framework for opting in to receiving network events asynchronously. It also converts XMLHttpRequest to use them, and paves the way for better support for synchronous XHR using on-demand, targeted event loops instead of spinning the global event loop. This gives us complete feature parity with the existing XHR implementation, using fewer threads than before in the async case.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 3151497d498b001b4a783dce0595615c6fc40936
On my laptop, running `./mach test-unit` goes from about 11 minutes to 22 seconds, when run after `./mach build`.
Fix#5291.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 017d1053617f6769d7f355e4a97d52ae67e53d1c
--HG--
rename : servo/components/net/test.jpeg => servo/tests/unit/net/test.jpeg
rename : servo/components/script/tests.rs => servo/tests/unit/script/size_of.rs
