nsXULWindow is no longer XUL specific and is somewhat confusing name.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D51486
--HG--
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsXULWindow.cpp => xpfe/appshell/AppWindow.cpp
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsXULWindow.h => xpfe/appshell/AppWindow.h
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsIXULWindow.idl => xpfe/appshell/nsIAppWindow.idl
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
nsXULWindow is no longer XUL specific and is somewhat confusing name.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D51486
--HG--
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsXULWindow.cpp => xpfe/appshell/AppWindow.cpp
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsXULWindow.h => xpfe/appshell/AppWindow.h
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsIXULWindow.idl => xpfe/appshell/nsIAppWindow.idl
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
nsXULWindow is no longer XUL specific and is somewhat confusing name.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D51486
--HG--
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsXULWindow.cpp => xpfe/appshell/AppWindow.cpp
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsXULWindow.h => xpfe/appshell/AppWindow.h
rename : xpfe/appshell/nsIXULWindow.idl => xpfe/appshell/nsIAppWindow.idl
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
the URL moz://a redirects to mozilla's website, Because it redirects to
https we want to use documentchannel.
Depends on D49100
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D51227
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Any number of outer windows may be attached to a BrowsingContext over its
lifetime. While the BrowsingContext is alive, it's easy to keep track of which
of these is active, and therefore which of its inner windows is active. After
it has been discarded, though, it discards its docShell reference, so all we
can tell about an inner window is whether it is active for its own outer
window, but not whether it should be considered active for its
BrowsingContext.
This patch updates the BrowsingContext detach logic to store a flag on the
current inner window recording that it was active when its BrowsingContext was
detached, and then later checks that flag to determine if it is the current
window for a detached BrowsingContext.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D49032
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Depends on D49870
We fail coop-sandbox.https.html without this, since the changes in bug 1566868 don't apply to DocumentChannel.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D49871
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We want this to run in both processes so that we set the cspToInherit on the LoadInfo within the child as well as the parent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47355
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Depends on D49870
We fail coop-sandbox.https.html without this, since the changes in bug 1566868 don't apply to DocumentChannel.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D49871
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We want this to run in both processes so that we set the cspToInherit on the LoadInfo within the child as well as the parent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47355
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This flips the direction in which the BrowserBridge actor is generally created
such that it is generally created in the parent and sent down to a child
process.
This is done by making the decision about what kind of switch to perform in the
parent, and sending messages down to child processes async to orchestrate these
process changes.
Process launching is changed to use an async `MozPromise`-returning API in this
patch, though the actual process launching still occurs synchronously. A future
patch will enable performing async process launching through the
NewOrUsedBrowserProcess mechanism.
I know of at least a few timing issues which exist with the new logic,
especially around the state of the BrowsingContext during the process
transition. I decided to not try to fix all of these issues in this patch, as
many are complex and will require changing how we manage the lifecycle of
BrowsingContext substantially. I do, however, think that the new logic is more
reliable and has fewer timing issues than the previous logic.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47310
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Add a new FIXUP_FLAG_PRIVATE_CONTEXT to nsIURIFixup, make it use the default
private search engine when it's set.
Update consumers to pass the new flag when necessary.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D48741
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When we have a parser-created iframe which starts out in-process, transitions
to remote, and then transitions back to in-process, we create separate
DocShells for the first and last in-process loads. Since both are
network-created, and have the same child index, they both try to add
themselves as children to their parent's SHistory at the same index. And since
the entry for the first DocShell already exists at that index when we try to
add the second, that triggers an assertion.
This isn't really ideal, but it is expected given the current state of session
history under Fission. It should hopefully be solved more gracefully when the
Fission-aware session history rewrite is done, but in the mean time, I think
we should just ignore the conflict, since it's expected.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D48437
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We were keeping nsDocShell::mHistoryId and nsDocShell::mOSHE as keys. They
weren't quite good because:
1. While loading an iframe, they were being registered twice with the same
ids(for about:blank and the real URL) sometimes.
2. It wasn't possible to access to the parent mHistoryId and mOSHE from a child
processes if the parent is in a different process. That may not be the case for
now, but it will be after fission.
So we had to find other IDs to:
1. Determine the Tab of the frames.
2. Determine the URLs of the frames.
For the first use case, we were using nsDocShell::mHistoryId for that purpose
but that was wrong. The closest thing that we can get to a tab ID is
BrowsingContext ID because they don't change after a navigation. But iframes
have different BrowsingContext's, so we still need to create a tree to
construct a tab content. That can be either in the front-end or capture time.
For the second use case, we were using a key pair of mHistoryId and mOSHE. We
now chose to keep inner window IDs for that purpose. Inner window IDs are
unique for each navigation loads because inner window correspond to each JS
window global objects. That's why we can use that without any problem. But one
problem is that we cannot handle `history.pushState` and `history.replaceState`
changes with that change since window global objects won't change during those.
But that was the best thing we can do after fission. So this will be a small
sacrifice for us to keep that functionality working after fission.
In that patch we also remove the registration/unregistration calls. We are
going to add those calls in the next patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47065
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This flips the direction in which the BrowserBridge actor is generally created
such that it is generally created in the parent and sent down to a child
process.
This is done by making the decision about what kind of switch to perform in the
parent, and sending messages down to child processes async to orchestrate these
process changes.
Process launching is changed to use an async `MozPromise`-returning API in this
patch, though the actual process launching still occurs synchronously. A future
patch will enable performing async process launching through the
NewOrUsedBrowserProcess mechanism.
I know of at least a few timing issues which exist with the new logic,
especially around the state of the BrowsingContext during the process
transition. I decided to not try to fix all of these issues in this patch, as
many are complex and will require changing how we manage the lifecycle of
BrowsingContext substantially. I do, however, think that the new logic is more
reliable and has fewer timing issues than the previous logic.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47310
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This flips the direction in which the BrowserBridge actor is generally created
such that it is generally created in the parent and sent down to a child
process.
This is done by making the decision about what kind of switch to perform in the
parent, and sending messages down to child processes async to orchestrate these
process changes.
Process launching is changed to use an async `MozPromise`-returning API in this
patch, though the actual process launching still occurs synchronously. A future
patch will enable performing async process launching through the
NewOrUsedBrowserProcess mechanism.
I know of at least a few timing issues which exist with the new logic,
especially around the state of the BrowsingContext during the process
transition. I decided to not try to fix all of these issues in this patch, as
many are complex and will require changing how we manage the lifecycle of
BrowsingContext substantially. I do, however, think that the new logic is more
reliable and has fewer timing issues than the previous logic.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47310
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
