fune/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-flexbox/flexbox-with-pseudo-elements-002.html
David Grogan b6e2c8b912 Bug 1681876 [wpt PR 26848] - [css-flex] Move moz flex tests from vendor-imports to css/css-flexbox, a=testonly
Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[css-flex] Move moz flex tests from vendor-imports to css/css-flexbox

Updated TestExpectations in place and organized the flex section a bit.

7 tests weren't moved because I already ported those to check-layout
versions in css/css-flexbox and they hadn't been deleted from
vendor-imports yet.

Removed two tests from css3/flexbox/mozilla because they were in the
move. One test is still in that directory because it wasn't in
vendor-imports.

Change-Id: I15e815ea15e30eee4568c65aa92dd364c17a5e9e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2585929
Commit-Queue: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#836059}

--
Suppress new lint errors after moving flexbox tests

--

wpt-commits: f5cc59806ce585bfdff8ac775de12b18e22a4ef0, d882d1829205f38d8b2ffff2ccd11c9cd24a0d05
wpt-pr: 26848
2020-12-17 13:30:56 +00:00

79 lines
2.5 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE html>
<!--
Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain.
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
-->
<!-- Testcase to ensure we handle ::before and ::after pseudo-elements on
a flex container and treat them as flex items (e.g. honoring "order").
-->
<html>
<head>
<title>CSS Test: Testing that generated content nodes are treated as a flex items, and honor 'order'</title>
<link rel="author" title="Daniel Holbert" href="mailto:dholbert@mozilla.com">
<link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#flex-items">
<link rel="match" href="flexbox-with-pseudo-elements-002-ref.html">
<meta charset="utf-8">
<style>
.flexContainer {
display: flex;
margin-bottom: 2px;
background: lightgray;
}
.withBefore::before {
content: 'b';
background: yellow;
/* This 'order' value should place us after the other elements, visually,
even though we're ::before. */
order: 1;
}
.withAfter::after {
content: 'a';
background: lightblue;
/* This 'order' value should place us before the other elements, visually,
even though we're ::after. */
order: -1;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<!-- 'b' should be at end, due to its high 'order' value: -->
<div class="flexContainer withBefore">
<div>I</div>
</div>
<!-- 'b' should be at beginning, since it's '::before' and the other item has
a matching 'order' value: -->
<div class="flexContainer withBefore">
<div style="order: 1">I</div>
</div>
<!-- 'a' should be at beginning, due to its low 'order' value: -->
<div class="flexContainer withAfter">
<div>I</div>
</div>
<!-- 'b' should be at beginning, since it's '::after' and the other item has
a matching 'order' value: -->
<div class="flexContainer withAfter">
<div style="order: -1">I</div>
</div>
<!-- As above, the ::after 'a' should be at beginning, and the ::before 'b'
should be at end, due to their 'order' values -->
<div class="flexContainer withBefore withAfter">
<div>I</div>
</div>
<!-- ...but now the normal item "I" has its order increased, so it'll go
at the end. -->
<div class="flexContainer withBefore withAfter">
<div style="order: 1">I</div>
</div>
<!-- ...and now the normal item "I" has its order reduced, so it'll go
at the beginning. -->
<div class="flexContainer withBefore withAfter">
<div style="order: -1">I</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>