fune/build/clang-plugin/tests/TestNoArithmeticExprInArgument.cpp
Nicholas Nethercote 464d8fa62a Bug 1123527 - Initialized some locals in TestNoArithmeticExprInArgument.cpp. r=ehsan.
I think these undefined variables don't matter because it's a static analysis
input, but defining them does stop cppcheck from complaining.

--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9f663aad5c939af6798cb9a080d25256c3d105fe
2015-01-15 22:16:38 -08:00

32 lines
1.2 KiB
C++

#define MOZ_NO_ARITHMETIC_EXPR_IN_ARGUMENT __attribute__((annotate("moz_no_arith_expr_in_arg")))
struct X {
explicit X(int) MOZ_NO_ARITHMETIC_EXPR_IN_ARGUMENT;
void baz(int) MOZ_NO_ARITHMETIC_EXPR_IN_ARGUMENT;
};
int operator+(int, X);
int operator+(X, int);
int operator++(X);
void badArithmeticsInArgs() {
int a = 1;
typedef int myint;
myint b = 2;
X goodObj1(a);
goodObj1.baz(b);
X badObj1(a + b); // expected-error{{cannot pass an arithmetic expression of built-in types to 'X'}}
X badObj2 = X(a ? 0 : ++a); // expected-error{{cannot pass an arithmetic expression of built-in types to 'X'}}
X badObj3(~a); // expected-error{{cannot pass an arithmetic expression of built-in types to 'X'}}
badObj1.baz(a - 1 - b); // expected-error{{cannot pass an arithmetic expression of built-in types to 'baz'}}
badObj1.baz(++a); // expected-error{{cannot pass an arithmetic expression of built-in types to 'baz'}}
badObj1.baz(a++); // expected-error{{cannot pass an arithmetic expression of built-in types to 'baz'}}
badObj1.baz(a || b);
badObj1.baz(a + goodObj1);
badObj1.baz(goodObj1 + a);
badObj1.baz(++goodObj1);
badObj1.baz(-1);
badObj1.baz(-1.0);
badObj1.baz(1 + 2);
badObj1.baz(1 << (sizeof(int)/2));
}