forked from mirrors/linux
		
	shrink_dentry_list(): take parent's ->d_lock earlier
The cause of livelocks there is that we are taking ->d_lock on dentry and its parent in the wrong order, forcing us to use trylock on the parent's one. d_walk() takes them in the right order, and unfortunately it's not hard to create a situation when shrink_dentry_list() can't make progress since trylock keeps failing, and shrink_dcache_parent() or check_submounts_and_drop() keeps calling d_walk() disrupting the very shrink_dentry_list() it's waiting for. Solution is straightforward - if that trylock fails, let's unlock the dentry itself and take locks in the right order. We need to stabilize ->d_parent without holding ->d_lock, but that's doable using RCU. And we'd better do that in the very beginning of the loop in shrink_dentry_list(), since the checks on refcount, etc. would need to be redone anyway. That deals with a half of the problem - killing dentries on the shrink list itself. Another one (dropping their parents) is in the next commit. locking parent is interesting - it would be easy to do rcu_read_lock(), lock whatever we think is a parent, lock dentry itself and check if the parent is still the right one. Except that we need to check that *before* locking the dentry, or we are risking taking ->d_lock out of order. Fortunately, once the D1 is locked, we can check if D2->d_parent is equal to D1 without the need to lock D2; D2->d_parent can start or stop pointing to D1 only under D1->d_lock, so taking D1->d_lock is enough. In other words, the right solution is rcu_read_lock/lock what looks like parent right now/check if it's still our parent/rcu_read_unlock/lock the child. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									ff2fde9929
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						046b961b45
					
				
					 1 changed files with 41 additions and 12 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										53
									
								
								fs/dcache.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										53
									
								
								fs/dcache.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -530,6 +530,38 @@ dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry, int unlock_on_failure)
 | 
			
		|||
	return dentry; /* try again with same dentry */
 | 
			
		||||
}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
static inline struct dentry *lock_parent(struct dentry *dentry)
 | 
			
		||||
{
 | 
			
		||||
	struct dentry *parent = dentry->d_parent;
 | 
			
		||||
	if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
 | 
			
		||||
		return NULL;
 | 
			
		||||
	if (likely(spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)))
 | 
			
		||||
		return parent;
 | 
			
		||||
	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
	rcu_read_lock();
 | 
			
		||||
again:
 | 
			
		||||
	parent = ACCESS_ONCE(dentry->d_parent);
 | 
			
		||||
	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
	/*
 | 
			
		||||
	 * We can't blindly lock dentry until we are sure
 | 
			
		||||
	 * that we won't violate the locking order.
 | 
			
		||||
	 * Any changes of dentry->d_parent must have
 | 
			
		||||
	 * been done with parent->d_lock held, so
 | 
			
		||||
	 * spin_lock() above is enough of a barrier
 | 
			
		||||
	 * for checking if it's still our child.
 | 
			
		||||
	 */
 | 
			
		||||
	if (unlikely(parent != dentry->d_parent)) {
 | 
			
		||||
		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
		goto again;
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
	rcu_read_unlock();
 | 
			
		||||
	if (parent != dentry)
 | 
			
		||||
		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
	else
 | 
			
		||||
		parent = NULL;
 | 
			
		||||
	return parent;
 | 
			
		||||
}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
/* 
 | 
			
		||||
 * This is dput
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -804,6 +836,8 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
 | 
			
		|||
		struct inode *inode;
 | 
			
		||||
		dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
 | 
			
		||||
		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
		parent = lock_parent(dentry);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		/*
 | 
			
		||||
		 * The dispose list is isolated and dentries are not accounted
 | 
			
		||||
		 * to the LRU here, so we can simply remove it from the list
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -817,6 +851,8 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
 | 
			
		|||
		 */
 | 
			
		||||
		if ((int)dentry->d_lockref.count > 0) {
 | 
			
		||||
			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
			if (parent)
 | 
			
		||||
				spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
			continue;
 | 
			
		||||
		}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -824,6 +860,8 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
 | 
			
		|||
		if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED)) {
 | 
			
		||||
			bool can_free = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_MAY_FREE;
 | 
			
		||||
			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
			if (parent)
 | 
			
		||||
				spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
			if (can_free)
 | 
			
		||||
				dentry_free(dentry);
 | 
			
		||||
			continue;
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -833,22 +871,13 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
 | 
			
		|||
		if (inode && unlikely(!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock))) {
 | 
			
		||||
			d_shrink_add(dentry, list);
 | 
			
		||||
			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
			if (parent)
 | 
			
		||||
				spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
			continue;
 | 
			
		||||
		}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		parent = NULL;
 | 
			
		||||
		if (!IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
 | 
			
		||||
			parent = dentry->d_parent;
 | 
			
		||||
			if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock))) {
 | 
			
		||||
				if (inode)
 | 
			
		||||
					spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
				d_shrink_add(dentry, list);
 | 
			
		||||
				spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
				continue;
 | 
			
		||||
			}
 | 
			
		||||
		}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		__dentry_kill(dentry);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		/*
 | 
			
		||||
		 * We need to prune ancestors too. This is necessary to prevent
 | 
			
		||||
		 * quadratic behavior of shrink_dcache_parent(), but is also
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue