forked from mirrors/linux
		
	tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity
The TPM burstcount and status commands are supposed to return very quickly [2][3]. This patch further reduces the TPM poll sleep time to usecs in get_burstcount() and wait_for_tpm_stat() by calling usleep_range() directly. After this change, performance on a system[1] with a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~10.7 sec to ~7 sec. [1] All tests are performed on an x86 based, locked down, single purpose closed system. It has Infineon TPM 1.2 using LPC Bus. [2] From the TCG Specification "TCG PC Client Specific TPM Interface Specification (TIS), Family 1.2": "NOTE : It takes roughly 330 ns per byte transfer on LPC. 256 bytes would take 84 us, which is a long time to stall the CPU. Chipsets may not be designed to post this much data to LPC; therefore, the CPU itself is stalled for much of this time. Sending 1 kB would take 350 μs. Therefore, even if the TPM_STS_x.burstCount field is a high value, software SHOULD be interruptible during this period." [3] From the TCG Specification 2.0, "TCG PC Client Platform TPM Profile (PTP) Specification": "It takes roughly 330 ns per byte transfer on LPC. 256 bytes would take 84 us. Chipsets may not be designed to post this much data to LPC; therefore, the CPU itself is stalled for much of this time. Sending 1 kB would take 350 us. Therefore, even if the TPM_STS_x.burstCount field is a high value, software should be interruptible during this period. For SPI, assuming 20MHz clock and 64-byte transfers, it would take about 120 usec to move 256B of data. Sending 1kB would take about 500 usec. If the transactions are done using 4 bytes at a time, then it would take about 1 msec. to transfer 1kB of data." Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									f5495bb9ac
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						424eaf910c
					
				
					 2 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -54,7 +54,9 @@ enum tpm_timeout { | ||||||
| 	TPM_TIMEOUT = 5,	/* msecs */ | 	TPM_TIMEOUT = 5,	/* msecs */ | ||||||
| 	TPM_TIMEOUT_RETRY = 100, /* msecs */ | 	TPM_TIMEOUT_RETRY = 100, /* msecs */ | ||||||
| 	TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US = 300,	/* usecs */ | 	TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US = 300,	/* usecs */ | ||||||
| 	TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL = 1	/* msecs */ | 	TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL = 1,	/* msecs */ | ||||||
|  | 	TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN = 100,      /* usecs */ | ||||||
|  | 	TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX = 500      /* usecs */ | ||||||
| }; | }; | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| /* TPM addresses */ | /* TPM addresses */ | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|  | @ -84,7 +84,8 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, | ||||||
| 		} | 		} | ||||||
| 	} else { | 	} else { | ||||||
| 		do { | 		do { | ||||||
| 			tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL); | 			usleep_range(TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN, | ||||||
|  | 				     TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX); | ||||||
| 			status = chip->ops->status(chip); | 			status = chip->ops->status(chip); | ||||||
| 			if ((status & mask) == mask) | 			if ((status & mask) == mask) | ||||||
| 				return 0; | 				return 0; | ||||||
|  | @ -273,7 +274,7 @@ static int get_burstcount(struct tpm_chip *chip) | ||||||
| 		burstcnt = (value >> 8) & 0xFFFF; | 		burstcnt = (value >> 8) & 0xFFFF; | ||||||
| 		if (burstcnt) | 		if (burstcnt) | ||||||
| 			return burstcnt; | 			return burstcnt; | ||||||
| 		tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL); | 		usleep_range(TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN, TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX); | ||||||
| 	} while (time_before(jiffies, stop)); | 	} while (time_before(jiffies, stop)); | ||||||
| 	return -EBUSY; | 	return -EBUSY; | ||||||
| } | } | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Nayna Jain
						Nayna Jain