forked from mirrors/linux
		
	cpumask: don't perform while loop in cpumask_next_and()
cpumask_next_and() is looking for cpumask_next() in src1 in a loop and tests if found cpu is also present in src2. remove that loop, perform cpumask_and() of src1 and src2 first and use that new mask to find cpumask_next(). Apart from removing while loop, ./bloat-o-meter on x86_64 shows add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-8 (-8) function old new delta cpumask_next_and 62 54 -8 Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									dfcce791fb
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						534b483a86
					
				
					 1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -37,10 +37,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu_nr);
 | 
			
		|||
int cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *src1p,
 | 
			
		||||
		     const struct cpumask *src2p)
 | 
			
		||||
{
 | 
			
		||||
	while ((n = cpumask_next(n, src1p)) < nr_cpu_ids)
 | 
			
		||||
		if (cpumask_test_cpu(n, src2p))
 | 
			
		||||
			break;
 | 
			
		||||
	return n;
 | 
			
		||||
	struct cpumask tmp;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	if (cpumask_and(&tmp, src1p, src2p))
 | 
			
		||||
		return cpumask_next(n, &tmp);
 | 
			
		||||
	return nr_cpu_ids;
 | 
			
		||||
}
 | 
			
		||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_next_and);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue