forked from mirrors/linux
		
	PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
True, it's often used in return statements, but after much bikeshedding it's probably better to have an explicit name. (I tried just putting the IS_ERR check inside PTR_ERR itself and gcc usually generated no more code. But that clashes current expectations of how PTR_ERR behaves, so having a separate function is better). Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Suggested-by: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									ad81f0545e
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						6e8b8726ad
					
				
					 1 changed files with 4 additions and 1 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline void * __must_check ERR_CAST(__force const void *ptr) | ||||||
| 	return (void *) ptr; | 	return (void *) ptr; | ||||||
| } | } | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(__force const void *ptr) | static inline int __must_check PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(__force const void *ptr) | ||||||
| { | { | ||||||
| 	if (IS_ERR(ptr)) | 	if (IS_ERR(ptr)) | ||||||
| 		return PTR_ERR(ptr); | 		return PTR_ERR(ptr); | ||||||
|  | @ -60,6 +60,9 @@ static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(__force const void *ptr) | ||||||
| 		return 0; | 		return 0; | ||||||
| } | } | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  | /* Deprecated */ | ||||||
|  | #define PTR_RET(p) PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(p) | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
| #endif | #endif | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| #endif /* _LINUX_ERR_H */ | #endif /* _LINUX_ERR_H */ | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Rusty Russell
						Rusty Russell