forked from mirrors/linux
		
	mm: unlockless reclaim
unlock_page is fairly expensive. It can be avoided in page reclaim success path. By definition if we have any other references to the page it would be a bug anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									f45840b5c1
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						a978d6f521
					
				
					 1 changed files with 8 additions and 1 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -732,7 +732,14 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, | |||
| 		if (!mapping || !__remove_mapping(mapping, page)) | ||||
| 			goto keep_locked; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 		unlock_page(page); | ||||
| 		/*
 | ||||
| 		 * At this point, we have no other references and there is | ||||
| 		 * no way to pick any more up (removed from LRU, removed | ||||
| 		 * from pagecache). Can use non-atomic bitops now (and | ||||
| 		 * we obviously don't have to worry about waking up a process | ||||
| 		 * waiting on the page lock, because there are no references. | ||||
| 		 */ | ||||
| 		__clear_page_locked(page); | ||||
| free_it: | ||||
| 		nr_reclaimed++; | ||||
| 		if (!pagevec_add(&freed_pvec, page)) { | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Nick Piggin
						Nick Piggin