forked from mirrors/linux
		
	KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts
Inspired by commit 9cac38dd5d (KVM/s390: Set preempted flag during
vcpu wakeup and interrupt delivery), we want to also boost not just
lock holders but also vCPUs that are delivering interrupts. Most
smp_call_function_many calls are synchronous, so the IPI target vCPUs
are also good yield candidates.  This patch introduces vcpu->ready to
boost vCPUs during wakeup and interrupt delivery time; unlike s390 we do
not reuse vcpu->preempted so that voluntarily preempted vCPUs are taken
into account by kvm_vcpu_on_spin, but vmx_vcpu_pi_put is not affected
(VT-d PI handles voluntary preemption separately, in pi_pre_block).
Testing on 80 HT 2 socket Xeon Skylake server, with 80 vCPUs VM 80GB RAM:
ebizzy -M
            vanilla     boosting    improved
1VM          21443       23520         9%
2VM           2800        8000       180%
3VM           1800        3100        72%
Testing on my Haswell desktop 8 HT, with 8 vCPUs VM 8GB RAM, two VMs,
one running ebizzy -M, the other running 'stress --cpu 2':
w/ boosting + w/o pv sched yield(vanilla)
            vanilla     boosting   improved
              1570         4000      155%
w/ boosting + w/ pv sched yield(vanilla)
            vanilla     boosting   improved
              1844         5157      179%
w/o boosting, perf top in VM:
 72.33%  [kernel]       [k] smp_call_function_many
  4.22%  [kernel]       [k] call_function_i
  3.71%  [kernel]       [k] async_page_fault
w/ boosting, perf top in VM:
 38.43%  [kernel]       [k] smp_call_function_many
  6.31%  [kernel]       [k] async_page_fault
  6.13%  libc-2.23.so   [.] __memcpy_avx_unaligned
  4.88%  [kernel]       [k] call_function_interrupt
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									2417c87059
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						d73eb57b80
					
				
					 3 changed files with 10 additions and 5 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 | 
			
		|||
		 * The vcpu gave up the cpu voluntarily, mark it as a good
 | 
			
		||||
		 * yield-candidate.
 | 
			
		||||
		 */
 | 
			
		||||
		vcpu->preempted = true;
 | 
			
		||||
		vcpu->ready = true;
 | 
			
		||||
		swake_up_one(&vcpu->wq);
 | 
			
		||||
		vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup++;
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
 | 
			
		|||
	} spin_loop;
 | 
			
		||||
#endif
 | 
			
		||||
	bool preempted;
 | 
			
		||||
	bool ready;
 | 
			
		||||
	struct kvm_vcpu_arch arch;
 | 
			
		||||
	struct dentry *debugfs_dentry;
 | 
			
		||||
};
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
 | 
			
		|||
	kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(vcpu, false);
 | 
			
		||||
	kvm_vcpu_set_dy_eligible(vcpu, false);
 | 
			
		||||
	vcpu->preempted = false;
 | 
			
		||||
	vcpu->ready = false;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	r = kvm_arch_vcpu_init(vcpu);
 | 
			
		||||
	if (r < 0)
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -2387,6 +2388,7 @@ bool kvm_vcpu_wake_up(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 | 
			
		|||
	wqp = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
 | 
			
		||||
	if (swq_has_sleeper(wqp)) {
 | 
			
		||||
		swake_up_one(wqp);
 | 
			
		||||
		WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->ready, true);
 | 
			
		||||
		++vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup;
 | 
			
		||||
		return true;
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -2500,7 +2502,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me, bool yield_to_kernel_mode)
 | 
			
		|||
				continue;
 | 
			
		||||
			} else if (pass && i > last_boosted_vcpu)
 | 
			
		||||
				break;
 | 
			
		||||
			if (!READ_ONCE(vcpu->preempted))
 | 
			
		||||
			if (!READ_ONCE(vcpu->ready))
 | 
			
		||||
				continue;
 | 
			
		||||
			if (vcpu == me)
 | 
			
		||||
				continue;
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -4203,8 +4205,8 @@ static void kvm_sched_in(struct preempt_notifier *pn, int cpu)
 | 
			
		|||
{
 | 
			
		||||
	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	if (vcpu->preempted)
 | 
			
		||||
	vcpu->preempted = false;
 | 
			
		||||
	WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->ready, false);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	kvm_arch_sched_in(vcpu, cpu);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -4216,8 +4218,10 @@ static void kvm_sched_out(struct preempt_notifier *pn,
 | 
			
		|||
{
 | 
			
		||||
	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
 | 
			
		||||
	if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING) {
 | 
			
		||||
		vcpu->preempted = true;
 | 
			
		||||
		WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->ready, true);
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
	kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu);
 | 
			
		||||
}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue