forked from mirrors/linux
		
	 93190bc35d
			
		
	
	
		93190bc35d
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			Switch all instrumentable users of the seqcount_latch interface over to the non-raw interface. Co-developed-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104161910.780003-5-elver@google.com
		
			
				
	
	
		
			216 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			6.7 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			216 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			6.7 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
| /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Latched RB-trees
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Copyright (C) 2015 Intel Corp., Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Since RB-trees have non-atomic modifications they're not immediately suited
 | |
|  * for RCU/lockless queries. Even though we made RB-tree lookups non-fatal for
 | |
|  * lockless lookups; we cannot guarantee they return a correct result.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * The simplest solution is a seqlock + RB-tree, this will allow lockless
 | |
|  * lookups; but has the constraint (inherent to the seqlock) that read sides
 | |
|  * cannot nest in write sides.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * If we need to allow unconditional lookups (say as required for NMI context
 | |
|  * usage) we need a more complex setup; this data structure provides this by
 | |
|  * employing the latch technique -- see @write_seqcount_latch_begin -- to
 | |
|  * implement a latched RB-tree which does allow for unconditional lookups by
 | |
|  * virtue of always having (at least) one stable copy of the tree.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * However, while we have the guarantee that there is at all times one stable
 | |
|  * copy, this does not guarantee an iteration will not observe modifications.
 | |
|  * What might have been a stable copy at the start of the iteration, need not
 | |
|  * remain so for the duration of the iteration.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Therefore, this does require a lockless RB-tree iteration to be non-fatal;
 | |
|  * see the comment in lib/rbtree.c. Note however that we only require the first
 | |
|  * condition -- not seeing partial stores -- because the latch thing isolates
 | |
|  * us from loops. If we were to interrupt a modification the lookup would be
 | |
|  * pointed at the stable tree and complete while the modification was halted.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| 
 | |
| #ifndef RB_TREE_LATCH_H
 | |
| #define RB_TREE_LATCH_H
 | |
| 
 | |
| #include <linux/rbtree.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/seqlock.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 | |
| 
 | |
| struct latch_tree_node {
 | |
| 	struct rb_node node[2];
 | |
| };
 | |
| 
 | |
| struct latch_tree_root {
 | |
| 	seqcount_latch_t	seq;
 | |
| 	struct rb_root		tree[2];
 | |
| };
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * latch_tree_ops - operators to define the tree order
 | |
|  * @less: used for insertion; provides the (partial) order between two elements.
 | |
|  * @comp: used for lookups; provides the order between the search key and an element.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * The operators are related like:
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  *	comp(a->key,b) < 0  := less(a,b)
 | |
|  *	comp(a->key,b) > 0  := less(b,a)
 | |
|  *	comp(a->key,b) == 0 := !less(a,b) && !less(b,a)
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * If these operators define a partial order on the elements we make no
 | |
|  * guarantee on which of the elements matching the key is found. See
 | |
|  * latch_tree_find().
 | |
|  */
 | |
| struct latch_tree_ops {
 | |
| 	bool (*less)(struct latch_tree_node *a, struct latch_tree_node *b);
 | |
| 	int  (*comp)(void *key,                 struct latch_tree_node *b);
 | |
| };
 | |
| 
 | |
| static __always_inline struct latch_tree_node *
 | |
| __lt_from_rb(struct rb_node *node, int idx)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	return container_of(node, struct latch_tree_node, node[idx]);
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| static __always_inline void
 | |
| __lt_insert(struct latch_tree_node *ltn, struct latch_tree_root *ltr, int idx,
 | |
| 	    bool (*less)(struct latch_tree_node *a, struct latch_tree_node *b))
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	struct rb_root *root = <r->tree[idx];
 | |
| 	struct rb_node **link = &root->rb_node;
 | |
| 	struct rb_node *node = <n->node[idx];
 | |
| 	struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
 | |
| 	struct latch_tree_node *ltp;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	while (*link) {
 | |
| 		parent = *link;
 | |
| 		ltp = __lt_from_rb(parent, idx);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		if (less(ltn, ltp))
 | |
| 			link = &parent->rb_left;
 | |
| 		else
 | |
| 			link = &parent->rb_right;
 | |
| 	}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	rb_link_node_rcu(node, parent, link);
 | |
| 	rb_insert_color(node, root);
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| static __always_inline void
 | |
| __lt_erase(struct latch_tree_node *ltn, struct latch_tree_root *ltr, int idx)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	rb_erase(<n->node[idx], <r->tree[idx]);
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| static __always_inline struct latch_tree_node *
 | |
| __lt_find(void *key, struct latch_tree_root *ltr, int idx,
 | |
| 	  int (*comp)(void *key, struct latch_tree_node *node))
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	struct rb_node *node = rcu_dereference_raw(ltr->tree[idx].rb_node);
 | |
| 	struct latch_tree_node *ltn;
 | |
| 	int c;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	while (node) {
 | |
| 		ltn = __lt_from_rb(node, idx);
 | |
| 		c = comp(key, ltn);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		if (c < 0)
 | |
| 			node = rcu_dereference_raw(node->rb_left);
 | |
| 		else if (c > 0)
 | |
| 			node = rcu_dereference_raw(node->rb_right);
 | |
| 		else
 | |
| 			return ltn;
 | |
| 	}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	return NULL;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * latch_tree_insert() - insert @node into the trees @root
 | |
|  * @node: nodes to insert
 | |
|  * @root: trees to insert @node into
 | |
|  * @ops: operators defining the node order
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * It inserts @node into @root in an ordered fashion such that we can always
 | |
|  * observe one complete tree. See the comment for write_seqcount_latch_begin().
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * The inserts use rcu_assign_pointer() to publish the element such that the
 | |
|  * tree structure is stored before we can observe the new @node.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * All modifications (latch_tree_insert, latch_tree_remove) are assumed to be
 | |
|  * serialized.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| static __always_inline void
 | |
| latch_tree_insert(struct latch_tree_node *node,
 | |
| 		  struct latch_tree_root *root,
 | |
| 		  const struct latch_tree_ops *ops)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	write_seqcount_latch_begin(&root->seq);
 | |
| 	__lt_insert(node, root, 0, ops->less);
 | |
| 	write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
 | |
| 	__lt_insert(node, root, 1, ops->less);
 | |
| 	write_seqcount_latch_end(&root->seq);
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * latch_tree_erase() - removes @node from the trees @root
 | |
|  * @node: nodes to remote
 | |
|  * @root: trees to remove @node from
 | |
|  * @ops: operators defining the node order
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Removes @node from the trees @root in an ordered fashion such that we can
 | |
|  * always observe one complete tree. See the comment for
 | |
|  * write_seqcount_latch_begin().
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * It is assumed that @node will observe one RCU quiescent state before being
 | |
|  * reused of freed.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * All modifications (latch_tree_insert, latch_tree_remove) are assumed to be
 | |
|  * serialized.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| static __always_inline void
 | |
| latch_tree_erase(struct latch_tree_node *node,
 | |
| 		 struct latch_tree_root *root,
 | |
| 		 const struct latch_tree_ops *ops)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	write_seqcount_latch_begin(&root->seq);
 | |
| 	__lt_erase(node, root, 0);
 | |
| 	write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
 | |
| 	__lt_erase(node, root, 1);
 | |
| 	write_seqcount_latch_end(&root->seq);
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * latch_tree_find() - find the node matching @key in the trees @root
 | |
|  * @key: search key
 | |
|  * @root: trees to search for @key
 | |
|  * @ops: operators defining the node order
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Does a lockless lookup in the trees @root for the node matching @key.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * It is assumed that this is called while holding the appropriate RCU read
 | |
|  * side lock.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * If the operators define a partial order on the elements (there are multiple
 | |
|  * elements which have the same key value) it is undefined which of these
 | |
|  * elements will be found. Nor is it possible to iterate the tree to find
 | |
|  * further elements with the same key value.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Returns: a pointer to the node matching @key or NULL.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| static __always_inline struct latch_tree_node *
 | |
| latch_tree_find(void *key, struct latch_tree_root *root,
 | |
| 		const struct latch_tree_ops *ops)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	struct latch_tree_node *node;
 | |
| 	unsigned int seq;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	do {
 | |
| 		seq = read_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
 | |
| 		node = __lt_find(key, root, seq & 1, ops->comp);
 | |
| 	} while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&root->seq, seq));
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	return node;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| #endif /* RB_TREE_LATCH_H */
 |