forked from mirrors/linux
		
	 68c1f08203
			
		
	
	
		68c1f08203
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			The entire point of printing the pointers in list_debug is to see if there's any useful information in them (eg poison values, ASCII, etc); obscuring them to see if they compare equal makes them much less useful. If an attacker can force this message to be printed, we've already lost. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180401223237.GV13332@bombadil.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			62 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			1.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			62 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			1.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
| /*
 | |
|  * Copyright 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Dave Jones
 | |
|  * Released under the General Public License (GPL).
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * This file contains the linked list validation for DEBUG_LIST.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| 
 | |
| #include <linux/export.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/list.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/bug.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/kernel.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/rculist.h>
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Check that the data structures for the list manipulations are reasonably
 | |
|  * valid. Failures here indicate memory corruption (and possibly an exploit
 | |
|  * attempt).
 | |
|  */
 | |
| 
 | |
| bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev,
 | |
| 		      struct list_head *next)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev,
 | |
| 			"list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n",
 | |
| 			prev, next->prev, next) ||
 | |
| 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next,
 | |
| 			"list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%px), but was %px. (prev=%px).\n",
 | |
| 			next, prev->next, prev) ||
 | |
| 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next,
 | |
| 			"list_add double add: new=%px, prev=%px, next=%px.\n",
 | |
| 			new, prev, next))
 | |
| 		return false;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	return true;
 | |
| }
 | |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_valid);
 | |
| 
 | |
| bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	struct list_head *prev, *next;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	prev = entry->prev;
 | |
| 	next = entry->next;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1,
 | |
| 			"list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
 | |
| 			entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
 | |
| 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2,
 | |
| 			"list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
 | |
| 			entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
 | |
| 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry,
 | |
| 			"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px\n",
 | |
| 			entry, prev->next) ||
 | |
| 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry,
 | |
| 			"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px\n",
 | |
| 			entry, next->prev))
 | |
| 		return false;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	return true;
 | |
| 
 | |
| }
 | |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry_valid);
 |