Callers should pass in UTF-8, since that's what the JS engine ends up with in the end anyway.
The various URL changes are because NS_NewURI converts incoming nsAString to
UTF-8 anyway. So we might as well do that up-front and then use the UTF-8
string for both the NS_NewURI call and the error-reporting if it fails.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D65543
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We probably just can remove it given that no other implementations are there.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36491
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Currently Firefox creates a 2D DOMMatrix when certain values of 16 elements are zero, so this change fixes it to align with the spec.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35326
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
DOMMatrix now internally uses double instead of float. This only fixes DOMMatrix internals so we still have to work on Servo CSS Parser to pass doubles instead of floats.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35284
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This reduces a lot the boilerplate that's needed in order to add simple binding
functions.
This starts using &Foo and Option<&Foo> instead, and as a result we need to
remove the servo_function_signatures test, which is a bit unfortunate.
I think it's worth though, this causes problems on some platforms (see bug
1534844), and messing up the functions signature is not something that I've ever
seen (other than bug 1308234, which already had all the FooBorrowed mess which
I'm removing).
Also, cbindgen understands references and Option<&Foo>, so it will be the way to
go in the future.
After this patch we can also remove HasSimpleFFI, but I've kept it for now since
I still use it in a few places, and this patch is quite big on its own.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D24092
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec.
Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make
css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous
patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the
way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why
the harness was falling over.
The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now
that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid
wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's
should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its
points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting
the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never
update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch
(and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug
to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended
the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the
DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice.
I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly
class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them
public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly
version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make
them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec.
Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make
css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous
patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the
way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why
the harness was falling over.
The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now
that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid
wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's
should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its
points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting
the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never
update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch
(and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug
to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended
the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the
DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice.
I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly
class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them
public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly
version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make
them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 97e9386cfb17319242913d28117c8b1b8b6fbbbe
The DOMMatrix.cpp changes are because it was sneaking in headers via another
unified file.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GPp9WOywI5D
--HG--
rename : dom/base/nsGenericDOMDataNode.cpp => dom/base/CharacterData.cpp
rename : dom/base/nsGenericDOMDataNode.h => dom/base/CharacterData.h
We have ServoCSSParser class, and I think it's better to move those
Servo FFI into this class to avoid including ServoBindings.h everywhere.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6orXtddp9ZU
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6da4158c4fec606aaee49fddee3192f94d6c85a3
We convert a _simplified_ specified transform list into a gfx matrix
by Servo backend. The _simplified_ means DOMMatrix only accepts a
transform list without any relative lengths, percentage, or other
keywords; otherwise, we throw a SyntaxError DOMException.
MozReview-Commit-ID: K8d30W0i60b
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d0975eb53753405046c68c8bf89906ae93f2a675
According to the spec:
https://drafts.fxtf.org/geometry/#dommatrixreadonly,
we should use IsIdentity(), to pass most of the test cases.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7qBAmuxwhUn
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a04a994c39015733ebec13204d8415b470d42e67
