When we navigate in history to the same entry that we're current at then we
actually do a reload. The problem is in the way we detect whether to do a reload
in the parent process.
If a page does a back and a forward one after the other in a script, then the
parent will calculate the index for the back and tell the child to load the
entry at that index. While the child is processing the load of that entry, the
BC in the parent process still has the same entry as its active entry (until the
child commits the load of the entry over IPC). The parent then processes the
forward, calculates the index for the forward and finds the entry at that index.
This is the same entry that we were at before doing anything, and so the same
entry as the active entry in the BC in the parent process. We used to compare
the entry that we're going to load with the active entry in the BC to determine
whether we're doing a reload, and so in this situation we would assume the
forward navigation was actually doing a reload. The child would reload the page,
and we'd run the script again and we'd end up in a reload loop.
Comparing the offset with 0 to determine whether we're doing a reload fixes this
issue.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D126585
When we navigate in history to the same entry that we're current at then we
actually do a reload. The problem is in the way we detect whether to do a reload
in the parent process.
If a page does a back and a forward one after the other in a script, then the
parent will calculate the index for the back and tell the child to load the
entry at that index. While the child is processing the load of that entry, the
BC in the parent process still has the same entry as its active entry (until the
child commits the load of the entry over IPC). The parent then processes the
forward, calculates the index for the forward and finds the entry at that index.
This is the same entry that we were at before doing anything, and so the same
entry as the active entry in the BC in the parent process. We used to compare
the entry that we're going to load with the active entry in the BC to determine
whether we're doing a reload, and so in this situation we would assume the
forward navigation was actually doing a reload. The child would reload the page,
and we'd run the script again and we'd end up in a reload loop.
Comparing the offset with 0 to determine whether we're doing a reload fixes this
issue.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D126585
Using requestedIndex on the child side is hard, because there are race conditions when a session history load is triggered
and at the same time a non-session history load commits a new active entry.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D126619
When we navigate in history to the same entry that we're current at then we
actually do a reload. The problem is in the way we detect whether to do a reload
in the parent process.
If a page does a back and a forward one after the other in a script, then the
parent will calculate the index for the back and tell the child to load the
entry at that index. While the child is processing the load of that entry, the
BC in the parent process still has the same entry as its active entry (until the
child commits the load of the entry over IPC). The parent then processes the
forward, calculates the index for the forward and finds the entry at that index.
This is the same entry that we were at before doing anything, and so the same
entry as the active entry in the BC in the parent process. We used to compare
the entry that we're going to load with the active entry in the BC to determine
whether we're doing a reload, and so in this situation we would assume the
forward navigation was actually doing a reload. The child would reload the page,
and we'd run the script again and we'd end up in a reload loop.
Comparing the offset with 0 to determine whether we're doing a reload fixes this
issue.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D126585
Otherwise when navigating to a replaced browsing context we might have
an incorrect "is single top-level in history".
Fixes test_window_close.html with Fission+bfcache.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D111458
Otherwise when navigating to a replaced browsing context we might have
an incorrect "is single top-level in history".
Fixes test_window_close.html with Fission+bfcache.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D111458
The patch makes HistoryTracker rely on SHEntrySharedParentState instead of nsSHEntryShared.
nsSHEntryShared already extends SHEntrySharedParentState.
The test was modified a tiny bit to make it easier to see the results. The test does pass
with SHIP+BFCache.
Depends on D108851
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D108984
The patch is utilizing SHistoryChangeNotifier which was added for testing.
CallerWillNotifyHistoryIndexAndLengthChanges is needed to avoid extra index/length updates so that
the child side doesn't get update but have still pending updates in it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D91756
ChildSHistory.legacySHistory isn't valid for content processes when
session history in the parent is enabled. We try to fix this by either
delegating to the parent by IPC or move the implementation partially
or as a whole to the parent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D89353
This enables navigating by index in session history go through the
session history in the parent (if enabled with the pref).
If the pref is enabled, then ChildSHistory::Go will send an IPC message
to the parent with the index to navigate to. The parent calls the
existing nsSHistory implementation and starts the loads, and
asynchronously returns the index that we actually navigated to. The
child process then uses that result to update the session history
implementation in the child process (this part is temporary, while we
have session history both in parent and in child). We also make the
parent send an updated length to the child process over IPC, so that
history.length always the length for the implementation in the parent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D65330
This enables navigating by index in session history go through the
session history in the parent (if enabled with the pref).
If the pref is enabled, then ChildSHistory::Go will send an IPC message
to the parent with the index to navigate to. The parent calls the
existing nsSHistory implementation and starts the loads, and
asynchronously returns the index that we actually navigated to. The
child process then uses that result to update the session history
implementation in the child process (this part is temporary, while we
have session history both in parent and in child). We also make the
parent send an updated length to the child process over IPC, so that
history.length always the length for the implementation in the parent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D65330
WalkHistoryEntries function gets called by nsSHistory::CloneAndReplaceChild
and nsSHistory::SetChildHistoryEntry recursively, so those have to be moved
into the parent process. This eliminates many sync IPC calls.
To facilitate transition to a new session history design,
we are mirroring mOSHE and mLSHE SH entries from docshell to browsing context.
Whenever we update those entries in docshell, we will also update those in BC,
and vice versa.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D56201
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
